NOISE POLLUTION MEANS WORSE GRADES.

The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children by Bridget Shield & Julie Dockrell (2007)

Paper #29 #30papers30days 🧵
Previous research into the effect of noise on children's educational attainment shows it reduces:

🎓 Grades
🧠 Memory
💪 Motivation
📚 Reading ability

Classic sources include road traffic, trains, aircraft, construction AND noisy classmates 💥
🛃 Shockingly, another study found that when a local airport closed, it took several years for the detrimental effects of noise to cease.

🛬 This suggests that noise deeply affects your educational trajectory.

It's like getting a stone in your shoe 20 minutes into a marathon.
🏫 This particular study measured noise levels from 142 primary schools in central London and correlated them with standardised SAT scores.

Children were aged 7-11. They controlled for social factors like English as an additional language, special education needs, poverty.
✈️ RESULTS: EXTERNAL NOISE

🔊 More noise = worse grades

👧 Older kids (age 11) were most negatively affected by noise pollution. This is probably because they've been exposed longest.

🧮 Maths grades were the most affected

⚖️ Some boroughs were disproportionately worse off
👩‍🏫 INTERNAL NOISE

🔊 More noise = worse grades

👨‍👧‍👦|📚 Group work and silent reading tasks suffered most particularly - as opposed activities like sitting on the floor listening or working individually.

🏫 Noise levels in halls and corridors had no impact on SAT scores.
Why this paper matters.

• Cities are known for great noise and great inequality. Unless schools, adapt, this will perpetuate

• Education profoundly impacts a child's life outcome

• Pupils can now WFH, too. Loud or quiet homes, emptier classes are likely affecting behaviour.
Light critique.

GOOD: large 140 school sample; controls for social factors

BAD: horrific fluency: "Activities 1 and 5", "Boroughs A, B, C" defined 27 pages earlier; zero graphs; tables ALL at end, p30 onwards

BETTER IF: study quiet schools, too. Also: the people want graphs!
📈 Edit: I found one graph in a deck online where the author Bridget Shield has shared how to improve the acoustic environment in schools. Worth a flick through:
slideplayer.com/slide/5906236/… Image
Source.

Shield, B. M., & Dockrell, J. E. (2008). The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 133-144.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Fanner

David Fanner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @utterlydavid

4 Sep
In this spirit of this being my 30th paper, I summarise a study showing how people prefer round prices.

Do investors prefer round stock prices? Evidence from Israeli IPO auctions by Shmuel Kandel, Oded Sarig and Avi Wohl (2001)

Paper #30 #30papers30days 🥳🎉🎈
📈 Since 1993, Israel has done stock IPOs differently to most countries. In the US, the price pre-determined on day 1.

In Israel, it's an auction, meaning the price is set by the public. On IPO day, people individually pre-order a desired quantity at a given price. 🪄
🧮 The authors examined every individual order (many thousands) from 27/28 Israeli IPOs in 1993-1994.

In an unbiased world, we would expect to see an equal distribution of prices ending in 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Read 9 tweets
2 Sep
Habits die in new environments but a zest for new ones emerges.

Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing
the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment by Bas Verplanken and Deborah Roy

Paper #28 #30papers30days 🧵
As we know, many people *think* about the environment, but fewer take action to safeguard it.

There are many reasons for this: it may make you worse off, better options may not exist where you live.

🌿 This paper explores the role of habit in taking environmental action.
The Habit Discontinuity Hypothesis suggests that when habits are broken, this creates a "window of opportunity for behaviour change"

👩‍🚀 Starting a new job
📍 Moving home
🚧 Roadworks

The discontinuity forces people to renegotiate new ways of doing things.
Read 10 tweets
6 Aug
A three ingredient recipe for keeping your human motivated.

Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.

Paper #5 #30papers30days 👇
Here's how it opens: a joy to read.

"The fullest representations of humanity show people to be curious, vital, and self-motivated. At their best, they are agentic and inspired, striving to learn; extend themselves; master new skills; and apply their talents responsibly."
This paper is about our motivation and the conditions required to facilitate it. They identify three ingredients.

• Competence: I believe in my ability to do
• Autonomy: I am *choosing* to do it (even if it's painful)
• Relatedness: I matter to others
Read 13 tweets
5 Aug
Everyone agrees that the ability to understand (and therefore influence) systems is immensely powerful. But what is systems thinking in the first place?

A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach by Ross Arnold & John Wade (2015).

Paper #4 #30papers30days 👇
This paper argues that to make Systems Thinking more understandable, a complete definition is required.

The dictionary says "a system is defined as a regularly interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole."

Something more than a collection of its parts.
Early on, the authors realise that systems thinking is literally *a system for thinking about systems* Image
Read 11 tweets
4 Aug
If you're reading this, you're probably a semi-expert in behavioural economics. Today I read the granddaddy paper of our field: Prospect Theory.

Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk by Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky (1979)

Paper #3 #30papers30days 👇
This paper rails against Expected Utility Theory - the idea that we weigh all options up and choose rationally - and ultimately annihilates this idea.

This paper is about certainty. Our desire to pick options that are most certain, even if they are worse.
Certainty Effect. People overweight outcomes that are considered certain.

You could win some money here. Would you pick A or B?
A: $4000 with an 80% probability
B: $3,000 (100% probability)

80% go for B.
Read 13 tweets
1 Aug
To spread behaviour and start movements, you should be careful about targeting central hubs.

Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties by Damon Centola (2007). A summary and light critique.

Paper #1 #30papers30days
Most behaviour spreads through social contact. Weak ties - people you barely know - easily spread viruses, and information, like a new job opening. They reach deeply into neighbourhoods you would never know. Whereas, strong ties already know all the gossip.
But, weak ties only allow for 'simple contagion'. Only one source is required to give me covid or tell me Team GB's score.
When the behaviour is costly (social cred, etc) or controversial, people may require independent affirmation and reinforcement from multiple sources.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(