I fear the #SocialCare debate is going the way of the Brexit debate. A binary choice between two polar opposites with nothing in between. In this case raise Nat Ins or don't. Already the debate on the media is between these two points.
2/ There is very limited to no discussion on:
- The bigger issues: what sort of model of social care do we want in the 21st century?
3/ What is the best way to structure social care, the balance between private and public, between in home and residential home care, between council responsibilities and the government's and why shouldn't social care be structured like the NHS?
4/ - All the current practical problems: things are far from ok, any new money won't go to improvement it will go fixing on problems.
5/ Some of these are deep rooted and not easily fixed with a bit of cash; e.g staff vacancies and turnover, the fragile financial base of many care home providers and the cumulative effect of years of cuts.
6/ - The detail: The additional money that maybe raised is said tone c.£10 to £12 billion. The current NHS budget is £212billion (inc £60 billion for COVID). Even £12 billion is just over 5%, less RPI inflation that's about 3% net. 3% for both NHS and social care.
7/ Even then, the plan is for the increase to be phased NHS first then social care.
Johnson's social care plan like his Brexit plan is therefore a partial solution that barely touches the major issues involved and flies in the face of what the problems are.
8/ This is no tough choice, it's a cop out to do as little as possible to milk for as much political advantage as possible. Both the media and the opposition are playing along with this. They keep the focus on the false binary choice and offer no debate on the alternatives.
9/ Brexit and COVID have shown what happens when Johnson and the Tories are allowed to set the agenda. We end up with poor choices and with a whole new set of problems yet Johnson is the hero who made "tough choices". We need the media and opposition to do much better .
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread with today’s Winston Smith news update
- the borders have not been shut
- there have not been 3 million vaccinations
- the schools are not shut
(1 of 5)
2/ the borders AREN’T shut as the newspaper headlines shout.
People can still travel to the UK. They simply have to self isolate for two weeks once they’ve arrived here. The isolation is entirely unpoliced.
A vaccination, ie full protection, from the current vaccines needs two shots. So far only around 400,000 people have been vaccinated, ie had both shots. The rest have only had one shot.
1/5 - Most of the media are pushing the Government line that Lockdown 3 isn't working well as Lockdown 1 because of our behaviour. What they don't make clear is that this Lockdown is weaker than the first one..
2/ The key differences are:
- the definition of key worker has been expanded to Lockdown 1 so that children who do not have a laptop or broadband access can go to work
- nurseries are open they weren't in Lockdown 1
3/ All the data shows that the pandemic is now worse than it was in Lockdown 1 yet the Government have chosen a weaker form of Lockdown (media people please note their choice)..
When the BBC cover #COVID19 in the US. They rightly point out Trump's role in their tragedy. They call out his mistakes and when he lies they say something like "there is no evidence of that".
2/ Yet when they cover the UK, it's like spread of the virus is some purely random thing. They never call out Johnson and the Government's mistakes the way they do Trump. They not only let their lies go free without a "there's no evidence of that" tag, they
3/ repeat them, without qualification or fact checking. Sky and ITV do this too. Why can't they cover COVID here the way they did in the US, Italy etc?
They also do not give adequate coverage of the alternatives to the Government's approach, for instance
A lot happens with #COVID19 everyday, some of it gets lost with everything else going on or just doesn't get covered. I'll try to do a regular (hopefully daily) Thread spotlighting important updates and insights I've come across.
Check out the updates below..
1 of 7
We didn't get to the bad place where we are on COVID by accident or luck, government mistake after mistake has got us here. This is my video look back on the road to here.
Not exhaustive, hopefully a record to spark your own memories..
(Thread 1/11)
2/ The first few months (from May 2020)
This clip from US news channel, CNN gives a summary of the first few months. We didn't then and haven't since seen anything like it on the BBC, Sky or ITV
3/ The first few months, December 2019 to May 2020 Detailed
A timeline of some of the key moments from the first few months of the pandemic. They got us to highest death toll in Europe in May.
(Based on a Thread by @imajsaclaimant )
No more Tiers? (Thread 1/11)
We've all seen the latest #COVID19 graphs showing the rate of infection spiralling upwards. The hospital admissions chart is the most scary, the level is now as high as the start of pandemic. So, it's clear the Tiers system isn't working..
2/ The Tiers haven't slowed the spread let alone cut it the way the first lockdown effectively did. Yet the government is still carrying on with Tiers despite it being obvious they're not working as Prof @chrischirp explains here..
3/ There urgently needs to be another, different approach, something that makes the graphs go down. It will be months at best, a year at worst before the vaccination programme will make an impact. Until then a growing infection rate risks more deaths and an overloading of..