My new book thread 1/n

"How Social Science Got Better: Overcoming Bias with More Evidence, Diversity, & Self-Reflection" is now published & available in stores!

You can order with a 30% discount at Oxford with this code: ASFLYQ6
global.oup.com/academic/produ…
It was a privilege to delve into great progress being made across economics, psychology, sociology, political science, & anthropology & return to fundamental questions in the history & philosophy of science. Thanks @OUPAcademic & all those who helped.

2/n
It is more difficult (but not impossible) to reach consensus cumulative knowledge in social sciences, but that is due to the diversity of human experience & the complex, cross-level processes we study, rather than our methods. Social scientists recognize their uphill battle

3/n
Social scientists face a long list of biases, from unrepresentative researchers to imperfect scientific practices to endemic difficulties of studying ourselves. But they are longstanding & now better known, not worse; we are increasingly rigorous, relevant, & self-reflective

4/n
The reproducibility movement has highlighted both fundamental & procedural problems in social science & successfully reformed practice. But we are unlikely to agree on procedural standardization. Instead, we are learning that much research is exploratory & we need all kinds.

5/n
The empirical, causal inference, & big data revolutions are important for social science progress, but so is team science, interdisciplinary, & theoretical & methodological pluralism. Stark theory & methods dichotomies are in decline as new generations learn from all sides

6/n
The social sciences are slowly internationalizing & diversifying. That has brought new questions, evidence, & interpretations & drawn attention to how what we study is a product of who we are. But more diverse critics have systematized our studies, not simply critiqued them

7/n
Most social science occurs in universities, with all their faults, but there is not a crisis when it comes to producing more social science knowledge. Instead, the social sciences are stable, growing in applied fields, & never the main sources of university funding growth

8/n
Each discipline comes with its own biases & odd internal organization. But that does not necessitate starting over. Interdisciplinarity by decree doesn't work. But integration in applied fields, exporting established ideas from one field to another, & team science all do.

9/n
We are often interested in difficult-to-answer questions with individual & social determinants over different time scales. Some progress comes from humility; we no longer see findings as temporally or geographically universal & we are no longer sticklers for individualism

10/n
All social science draws from history (our available data) & potential applications (our aspirations for change). We need to recognize the political unrepresentativeness that guides goals & our history of overpromising & social engineering. But practice also helps us learn

11/n
Popularization is a common source of misunderstanding, but it is an opportunity to clarify disagreements, pare down overbroad claims, & bring practitioners & synthesizers into the assessment of evidence. Popular conversations advance research, but take time to congeal.

12/n
Most social scientists share my many reasons for optimism, but also cite (somewhat contradictory) reasons for pessimism. Many of the problems have been with us from the beginning.

We have a long way to go, but should be excited about the direction of our fields.

13/n
How Social Science Got Better

You can read it instantly:


Or order your copy today:
global.oup.com/academic/produ…

I welcome your thoughts.

14/14
You can also hear a hopefully enlightening discussion on the book & the state of social science on a recent podcast:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Grossmann

Matt Grossmann Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MattGrossmann

29 May
Left parties in many countries have exchanged support from low-education voters for high-education voters since 1970, but without becoming parties of the rich; the right in many places has become a coalition of the rich & the uneducated

economist.com/graphic-detail…
The reversal of the educational cleavage in most countries is strongly linked to the emergence of a new sociocultural axis of political conflict & the rise of Green & anti-immigration politics

From a new version of
“Brahmin Left versus Merchant Right”
wid.world/document/brahm…
While the shift is global, the US stands out as moving from almost no left/right division on education & a large division on income in 1970 to a large division on education & almost no division on income by 2010 (by this measure)
Read 5 tweets
12 May
Long way to go, but more traditional NSF funding & DOE national lab funding have successfully attached themselves as solutions to today’s focus problem of Chinese technology competition; also, the distributed locations of national labs & grant-seeking universities still matter
Compared to other issue areas, significant science & tech policy changes involve more leadership from administrative agencies; but the policymaking network is sparsely connected with no core; there has long been high international but low public influence
amazon.com/Artists-Possib…
There is now a good chance that we'll more than double traditional NSF directorate funding (while creating a new directorate & funding national labs) under the guise of an anti-China technology competition bill

Senate bill now more closely tracks the House bill, but with more $
Read 4 tweets
11 May
Polled issue opinions are associated with ballot initiative outcomes but popular policies underperform; voters systematically prefer the "no" option
#polisciresearch
dropbox.com/s/zn2uf6kyv8id…
Great generalization of the research on how Washington's real-world campaigns reduced support for climate initiatives by 20 percentage points:

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
CW among consultants is that an initiative should start with 2/3 support in the polls to pass (with 50%), usually explained not just as status quo bias but responsiveness to negative information; eg, con spending on initiatives is more important than pro:
amazon.com/Populist-Parad…
Read 4 tweets
10 May
Democrats lost vote share among Latinos, from 71-29% in 2016 to 63-37% in two-way, but gained among white voters with a college degree, from 50-50 to 54-46% in 2020

New Catalyst estimates:

catalist.us/wh-national/
Turnout was up substantially in 2020, especially among younger voters

New Catalist estimates:
catalist.us/wh-national/
The density divide remained strong in 2020, but Biden lost ground in urban areas & gained in rural & suburban areas vs 2016

New Catalist estimates:

catalist.us/wh-national/
Read 8 tweets
2 May
The run-for-President successful Republican agenda is apparently:
- restrict mail voting
- fine social media for bans
- riot / protest restriction
- ban vaccine passports
- ban transgender in girls sports
- spend the federal stimulus
miamiherald.com/news/politics-…
Noem is pursuing a similar focus on symbolic cultural politics & appeals to conservative media:
nytimes.com/2021/05/02/us/…

In Red State Blues, I find that Republican control of states polarized cultural politics but didn’t shift state economic policy much:
amazon.com/Red-State-Blue…
Meanwhile, Democratic state governments are continuing to move leftward on economic & cultural issues, though without reinvention:
seattletimes.com/seattle-news/p…
Federal $ means size & scope of gov will continue growing across Dem & Rep states, continuing long patterns I found
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
Biden’s reconciliation-driven spend without strings or reform policy agenda seems to reverse Obama-era technocratic trends in Democratic policymaking, with a return to old Dem pol constituency distribution objectives. But it also reflects updated & diversifying academic advice
Economists have largely changed their balance of concerns on deficit spending & on cash benefits. Biden is also relying on more diverse & sociologically-inspired academic advice, visible in defining infrastructure to include social care & greater attention to racial equity.
Points 3 & 4 in @ezraklein's column are similar, but he emphasizes economics losing credibility & change in public mood:
nytimes.com/2021/04/08/opi…
Point #2 about the new generation of staffers also applies to the academic help: more diverse, liberal, & less tied to traditional econ
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(