The Ghost 👻 - Never available. You have much less contact time than you need, but you get gaslit due to statements like "a good PhD candidate just gets on with stuff". Really you just aren't getting enough guidance.
The Paper Mill 📃- Sees you as nothing more than a way to bolster their tenure bid, and pushes you to the brink to produce papers, pretending that breaking point is for your benefit. Spoiler, it isn't.
The Combatant 🥊- Actively has taken a dislike to you and doesn't want you to succeed. Perhaps you are a little different to their "ideal" student and they don't know how to manage you, so rather than working WITH you to reach a mutual understanding, *you* are "problem".
The Workaholic 🏋️- Absolutely loves the academy, which means they live and breathe it but then can't understand why you wouldn't be working every single hour of every single day too.
The Laser 🔫 - Needs to be in control and has laser beam eyes on you at all times. They don't understand that they are micromanaging you into the ground and inhibiting your creativity.
The Predator 🦖- There's a power dynamic and they know it - they know they have it all, and control your fate and use this against you. They threaten to not give you a good reference if you do not comply.
These are just some of the reasons that training academics in supervision and mentorship is ESSENTIAL. We must hold individuals accountable as it can impact grad student well-being a huge amount.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The thing with academia is I can sit here and tell you to set boundaries. To not work weekends for your mental health, because you shouldn't have to, but the culture of overwork means that if you take a step back and look after yourself, or take time to be with your family 1/
or simply, want to enjoy your life outside of the academy, I cannot guarantee you will be "successful" in academia. Because from where I sit, to be successful means to give everything. Your weekends, your health. You are meant to show up and deliver classes during a 2/
pandemic "for the love of it", with disregard for your life because you have no choice. And after all that your dedication and sacrifice might still mean nothing because of the the fact it's not a meritocracy. 3/
So I received this DM today (shared anon with permission, because I think this is something I want to discuss publicly).
Honestly, it doesn't matter of some students "lie" about their mental health, or deaths in the family. We must believe them. 1/
If a student feels the need to lie like this they ARE struggling. Maybe they are working 3 jobs to make ends meet and can't hit deadlines, maybe they are neurodiverse and struggling, maybe their mental health is impacted but from our perspective we just can't see it. 2/
Perhaps more students coming forward and disclosing mental health concerns is because they've always been there but are only now getting the confidence to speak out about it. /3
The "my academic picture was taken in the 90s" academic.
You go to meet them, you've looked up what they look like, you realise their photo on the university website hasn't been updated in 200 years. They know their stuff, and are a solid 7/10.
The "Definitely got your back, what a Belle" academic.
Great mentor, always got your best interests at heart. Probably knee deep in diversity and inclusion initiatives and not getting enough credit for it. Alway makes you go back and read the literature. 11/10.
How can universities support graduate/PhD mental health? Here's some thoughts on what institutions can work towards today 👇#AcademicMentalHealth#AcademicChatter
1 - Acknowledge that the research culture plays a role 🏛️
The onus to improve mental health isn't just on the individual. It's time to acknowledge that the stressors at university impact grad students.
2 - Train PIs 🧑🏫
Promoted to positions of power based on research capabilities PIs often haven't been trained in mental health, like even for 2 hours. Providing basic training can help.
Why did I leave academia? It's complex. It's 100% related to the culture of academia that I felt I couldn't stay. So here's a thread on why, particularly as a woman, with depression, I had to leave, despite having a good track record and designs on being a prof one day. 1/
The precarity of contracts. Honestly, the rolling from one contract to the next was crushing. Not knowing if I'd be jobless in a few months was too much. Combine that with my anxiety, and it was debilitating. I've since got a permanent job in industry. 2/
The culture of overwork. Feeling like I had to be constantly "on" all the time, and if I wasn't it was valuable time I could have been working on a paper to get ahead. Again with my depression (and quite frankly anyone else with or without depression) burnout was not my friend.3/
Here's a thread breakdown of the recent @RoySocChem diversity data report 2020 as it pertains to ethnicity. Please go check out the full report.
Evidence is there that systemic racism exists in the chemical sciences. We need to do more for equity. Here's some of the report: 1/
Note: This is not a thread condemning the RSC but pointing to systemic racism throughout Chemistry as a whole. I want to commend the RSC by leading with a "data first" approach, because having a starting point is the only way we can enact change. There is a long way to go. 2/
All figures in this thread belong to the @RoySocChem report (link at the end of the thread). For this thread I've focused on the data for Black chemists to raise awareness. 3/