My interview with @Noahpinion where we discuss the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the threat of inflation, economic policy priorities and the culture of the economic profession.
I am confident that any reasonable observer will conclude that the constraints on stimulus proposed & enacted were political rather than economic in '08/'09. This view is supported by the fact that Congress cutback the Admin's proposals before passing them by a razor thin margin.
My arguments re: inflation do not derive from a specific econometric model. I believe the problem with much of the conventional wisdom is that models fit to the last 40 years of data, where inflation has never accelerated, will almost definitionally yield complacent conclusions.
Transitory goes both ways. When in the next few months used car prices mean revert the CPI will be distorted down. How clearly this is acknowledged by the inflation optimists will be a test of integrity.
I strongly doubt the delta virus economic dislocations can be addressed w easy money. Many of issues are on supply side (parents not working). Others are narrowly sectoral (travel). In neither case, will general demand stimulus be efficacious. Likely it will generate inflation.
I think QE is very hard to justify given the level of output and inflation currently and prospectively and its toxic impacts on inequality & financial stability. I think we should already be tapering and should be moving to taper as rapidly as we can, without panicking markets
I think the single highest return investment opportunity for US is a major Marshall Plan for Covid containment. Beyond moral case w millions dying around the world & global economy losing trillions, there is the reality that no one is safe until everyone is safe b of mutations.
There are the further considerations that there is no better way for us to garner international goodwill, contrasting ourselves favorably with China, or assure the world is ready for the next pandemics that will surely come.
I think there is no question that economics has become more empirical over time. And it’s range has increased into more social policy oriented topics. There has also been a big upwards drift in the extent of collaborative work.
All of this has reduced the cult of veneration of raw smartness that was more part of the profession when I entered it than it is today. That makes economics more welcoming and congenial for more people. That is progress.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More vaccination is necessary for Covid control. I am not convinced of its sufficiency. There is a critical go forward role for testing and isolating the infected and for masking. We can all rejoin the world but for a time not on the same terms as before.
I am a non-alarmist who is proud of not getting spun up by anecdotes to become fearful. But I found @DLeonhardt's @nytimes complacency regarding risks to the vaccinated to be typical of widespread views and dangerously misplaced.
At the 1/5000 daily probability @DLeonhardt estimates the chance that a close relative (nephew most distant counted) will get Covid in next 6 months is two thirds.
.@nytimes@bencasselman@jeannasmialek write interesting article stressing distinctions btw 1960s when inflation accelerated & present moment. In fact, I think most factors point to more cause for concern now than in 1966 when inflation accelerated 3-4 pts in 4 yrs. Consider this
1/Then, the deficit was in range of 3 percent. Now the deficit is in the range of 15 percent.
2/Then, nominal and real interest rates then were significantly positive and Fed has no big balance sheet. Now, nominal rates are essentially 0, real rates are negative and the Fed is growing its balance sheet at a rate of more than a trillion a year.
Today in Venice @Tharman_S@NOIweala & I presented a report to G20 fin. ministers & central bank govs on financing for #pandemicpreparedness. At press conference I said: For none of us is this our first rodeo w a global issue that requires a global collective response. #G20HLIP
For all of us, this is the first time where we have seen one where the expenditure of tens of billions of dollars is likely to prevent the need for spending tens of trillions of dollars down the road.
It is nearly certain we will see another COVID, the question is whether we will as international community be ready.
1. I am thrilled to see bipartisan support for tax compliance efforts. Investing in IRS will raise substantial revenue and create a more efficient and equitable tax system.
2. The @WSJEditorial board disagrees, and shockingly argues that *increasing deficits* is preferable to cracking down on tax cheats.
.@porszag cites superforecasters who think there is only a 42 percent chance of inflation exceeding 3 percent for the year. The Administration budget projections (perhaps reflecting lags in the process) call for inflation closer to 2 percent this year.
Given that inflation has totaled 2.7 percent in first 5 months of this year I think odds are better than 42 percent of higher 3 percent inflation in first half of the year!
Watch here my @CFR_org talk with @gilliantett yesterday where I talked about inflation, saying:
The @federalreserve has traditionally acted and spoken in ways designed to preempt inflation fears.
Today, the @federalreserve speaks in a way designed to preempt the idea the Fed MIGHT have inflation fears. That’s a very different thing and likely to contribute to development of an inflation psychology.
The famous doctrine of @federalreserve has always been William McChesney Martin’s remark: Fed’s job is to “take away the punch bowl” before the party gets out of hand. What we are now saying is we are not going to do anything until we see a bunch of drunk people staggering around