Good morning, we are going to kick off our conclusion of History of Criminology & introduce the Positivist School. Buckle in my friends, we have a lot of work to do!
People freely choose their behavior; that motives such as greed, revenge, need, anger, lust, jealousy, thrill-seeking, and vanity are just expressions of free will, personal choice, conclusion, & decision-making that people have made
The #ClassicalSchool indicates that your emotions are YOUR rational response to what is happening around you. And if that is the case, you can choose how you react
The Classical School: The more certain, swift, and severe the punishment, the greater is its ability to control criminal behavior, especially if the punishment is fair and serves some rational and legitimate purpose
I have to say, this all sounds great! I can think of a lot of punishments I try to avoid. What do YOU do when you see a police cruiser running radar on the side of the road?
But that brings us back to our initial question. Most individuals in society are aware of the Criminal Justice system, specifically that prisons exist.
Not until Charles Darwin (1809–1882) challenged the doctrine of creation with his theory of the evolution of species did the next generation of criminologists have the tools with which to challenge classicism
Through the use of scientific methods, understanding biological, psychological, and social differences, then negative differences can be eradicated ... reducing crime!
“Insane criminals” become criminal as a result of some change in their brains that interferes with their ability to distinguish between right and wrong.
“Criminoloids” make up habitual criminals, criminals by passion, and other diverse types.
Ferri, a student of Lombroso, believed that criminals could not be held morally responsible because they did not choose to commit crimes but, rather, were driven to commit them by conditions in their lives.
Influenced by Lombroso’s theory of atavistic stigmata, in which he found many shortcomings, Garofalo traced the roots of criminal behavior not to physical features but to their psychological equivalents, which he called “moral anomalies.”
Although Lombroso, Ferri, and Garofalo did not always agree on the causes of criminal behavior or on the way society should respond to it, their combined efforts marked a turning point in the development of the scientific study of crime
Classic criminologists thought the problem of crime might be solved through limitations on governmental power, the abolition of brutality, and the creation of a more equitable system of justice.
In honor of next week's Twinkie, for your extra credit for reading through the entire thread, send me a picture of your favorite junk food with your response.
I'm a sucker for cheese and crackers ... everytime!
Good afternoon, today we are going to introduce the police as an organization, specifically how American Law Enforcement differs from other organizations we see in society & in the government
My friend & colleague @CGVallejo sparked an interesting discussion last February. It's such a strong discussion, I saved to share with students today ... feel free to see what some of our best have to say ...
Good morning friends! I'm actually tweeting from the office today, and according to my water bottle I'm feeling awesome. So let's jump into this discussion of individual causes of delinquency.
Welcome, policing fans, policing critics, policing students, & everyone in between, this evening we are going to take an introductory look at Contemporary Policing.
Before we get started with Unit 02, I wanted to check in how the course is progressing for you so far. Now that we've got one unit under our belt, how is online learning treating you?
Hi all! Welcome to Criminal Justice from the home office, today we are going to examine some of the "Then & Now" aspects of American Policing. I hope you follow along...