The problem is deeper than that.

The "good church girl" who wants to "save herself for marriage" may or may not be what she presents herself as.

She might be what she seems.

She might have decided last week to be a "born again virgin".
Treat the second girl like the first and she'll get bored and lose interest - at best (at worst, she fakes interest until marriage).

Treat the first girl like the second and maybe she rejects your advances - which is exactly the same situation a man is in with *every girl*.
There is no solution for men or women except to figure out how to navigate a world where the absolutely needed traditions have been discarded and all the solutions are suboptimal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Covfefe Anon

Covfefe Anon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CovfefeAnon

18 Sep
This was an intentional lie by Scott to cover up why his tribe always falls for hoaxes.

It's not some neutral principle, its a facet of the left - you demonstrate loyalty by believing a big lie - hence why his post failed totally to give examples of anything similar on the right
This is not to say that the right is a truth machine but it fails in a very different way - it fails out of failing to understand the nature of the left - it often claims a motive of *financial* corruption when there's none there.
To a leftist money is meaningless because when you have power you can simply take money from those without power.

Every NGO lawsuit that extracts millions from some corp is the left transmuting power to money.

Rightists live in a world where money is earned on the market.
Read 4 tweets
13 Sep
The rarely seen reverse slippery slope argument

"you agreed to all these intermediate steps, why object now?"
The actual answer is that this is a valid measure for a sane, responsible government and it would get compliance - but what we have is an insane malicious government.

You can't import hundreds of thousands of Afghans *and* believe the next measure isn't done out of malice too.
You don't get to have your government run by people who gloat about how angry this measure makes people - revealing that their real motive is the anger - and also have people not notice.
Read 4 tweets
23 Aug
It's hilarious hearing people talk about "rescuing" women from Afghanistan when the place is revealed preference female paradise.

The men fight to the death leaving only winners who marry women and produce lots of kids. As a bonus they clamp down on ♀️ intrasexual competition.
Do these women worry about "society's expectations about appearance" or that b next door trying to catch her man's eye? Image
Women in Afghanistan be like

Western women be like

"WE MUST RESCUE THE WOMEN IN ONE OF THESE PICTURES" ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
1 Aug
Great thread (as always) by 17c here but I disagree with this assertion.

The "problem" with evolution is that it has the ability to get trapped at local maxima - as long as a solution is good enough, it suffices.

Progressivism is strengthened by evolved adaptations to it.
Look at criminal justice as an ex.

Initial state - cops on beats have personal executive authority

Progressive attack - only priestly judicial authority can legitimize punishment

Evolved solution - cops can that authority only on a "suspect" who "flees" or "resists"
This evolved solution works for a while but the progressives start getting itchy - there's power out there and people unwilling to defend it.

Video cameras in private hands mean *every* incident can be reviewed by priests - the adaptation fails.
Read 8 tweets
14 Jul
Listening to the Curtis Yarvin interview on the Fire Down Below podcast and there was an interesting point of disagreement that wasn't explored.

At around the 45:00 mark Curtis describes how to replace the current regime - a true election.

patreon.com/posts/fire-dow…
(paraphrasing)

"If someone was elected on a platform of 'I will take command of the executive branch entirely and rule' and the candidate who ran on that won, USG would give up and collapse due to preference falsifications and guilty knowledge of having ruled badly"
One of the co-hosts (the one who speaks less) points out - "no, they would not lose hope and give" - *and he's right* - and the matter is dropped.

The things you think are being done badly aren't flaws, they're features to the ruling class.
Read 11 tweets
13 Jul
Read this thread.

Read the quoted passages.

None of this was "by accident" - this was systemic ethnic cleansing done informally and therefore with plausible deniability.

This is a horror of the 20th century and the criminals who perpetrated it have never been held to account.
Blog post linked here by a teacher who lived through this

Often people get to the right conclusion but can't imagine the actual cause.

Lack of respect for property goes back further than welfare - it goes back to a tropical evolutionary environment where there is no durable property.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(