@YoureAllDunces Comparison of "Spreading Speed" between SARS-COV-1 (Original SARS 2003-2004) and SARS-COV-2:

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
"Compared to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 is causing an even more severe pandemic due to its spreading speed and the population affected. Deep studies comparing the different disease-causing coronaviruses will shed light on the fundamental mechanisms of coronavirus
related diseases.

"Even though S proteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 share very similar structures, the binding affinities of S protein and ACE2 of SARS-CoV-2 are much higher than SARS-CoV (Koehl, 2018). This might be the key reason for SARS-CoV-2's faster-spreading speed,
comparing to SARS-CoV."

Also, the SARS-CoV-2 has higher electric field line density than that of SARS-CoV, which indicates stronger interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2, compared to that of SARS-CoV. Those facts make the interactions of SARS-CoV-2 more robust than SARS-
"COV.

which may explain why COVID-19 spreads faster than SARS in 2003. However, this study did not take into account other parts of S proteins except for the binding domain. In this case, we have a hypothesis that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein RBD may be easier to flip out its RBD
"when reaching out ACE2, since some mutations are found at the linkage area between its binding domain and other parts, and this mechanism may also make the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 easier to bind to ACE2."

RBD = RECEPTOR BINDING DOMAIN
This spreading speed, according to these findings, relied upon mutations in the Spike Protein, particularly in the RBD. Here are the results, in claimed numbers of victims of both viruses, of the change in Spreading Speed.
Seven coronaviruses can infect humans. The one that causes SARS emerged in southern China in 2002 and quickly spread to 28 other countries. More than 8,000 people were infected by July 2003, and 774 died. A small outbreak in 2004 involved only four more cases.
Since its discovery in December 2019 the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the transmission of a novel coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 induced pneumonia, infected more than 37,800,000 people worldwide and caused more than 1,080,000 deaths until October, 2020.
Are these increases in spreading speed reasonable given the response to SARS-COV-2 with lockdowns, masks, social distancing, etc., all enforced by police powers, while SARS-COV-1 experienced next to ZERO in response? 8,000 infected by SARS-COV-1 and 37,800,000 infected by COVID?
Keep probing the history of research into coronaviruses going back to 1965. Something doesn't seem right about this. It was hard for people to catch SARS-COV-1.
@threadreaderapp Please unroll for future use. Many thanks.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Guy Jordan

Guy Jordan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Farrier105

17 Sep
@MichaelWeddle15 @with_integrity @stranahan Why does Trump enact Neocon policies like the coup in Venezuela and putting troops in Syria in the first place? It needs to be explained why CrowdStrike told the story they told to WAPO on June 13, 2016--indirectly--that Fancy Bear did NOT steal the emails.
@MichaelWeddle15 @with_integrity @stranahan That makes them look stupid when Guccifer 2.0 shows up and claims he stole the emails. When you look at Shawn Henry's declassified testimony to Congress, it APPPEARS that CrowdStrike thought Cozy Bear could have stolen the emails. CrowdStrike admitted they did not witness...
@MichaelWeddle15 @with_integrity @stranahan ...most of the documents being exfiltrated, and cannot prove the Russians did it, only that they STAGED documents for exfiltration.

That is NOT setting the table for the "Russians stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks" scenario. So, why were at the DNC?
Read 21 tweets
15 Sep
@RWMaloneMD Doctor: I have been researching the S1 protein of the original SARS virus from early 2000s to see if it performed similar actions against human health as does the SARS-COV-2 S1 protein. The SARS spike was just as dangerous as it turns out.
Read 13 tweets
1 Aug
@1foreverseeking “No, Really, mRNA Vaccines Are Not Going To Affect Your DNA” is also a good read.

Unless the Reverse Transcriptase enzyme is secreted inside that lipid package. RT enables RNA to be transcribed into DNA rather than DNA going to RNA.

flemingmethod.com
@1foreverseeking I ran the Google search question--Does the human body contain the Reverse Transcriptase enzyme? One of the answers follows:
@1foreverseeking Ibrahim Bayfdoun: Senior Research Tech. at King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam (2015-present)
Answered August 19, 2020
Originally Answered: Do humans have reverse transcrptase?
Read 11 tweets
30 Jul
@EmeraldRobinson @WinkWeary @KJP46 On July 6th, I put up this thread about the spike protein and the variants, stating that only significant changes to the spike protein should hamper the immune response created by the vaccine since the vaccine used spike protein as the immune response trigger.
@EmeraldRobinson @WinkWeary @KJP46 On July 8th, National Institutes of Health (NIH) published this about the Delta Variant of SARS-COV-2.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34237773/
Read 7 tweets
6 Jul
The History of Research into Corona Virus Spike Protein
2004--2020

We've been told that the researchers who came up with the mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 did not realize the spike protein was a danger to humans in its own right, separate from the virus.
In the next breath, the same researchers say that the spike protein of the SARS-COV-2 virus was not the one used for the mRNA vaccines, so, if it wasn't the same, was the spike protein used NOT dangerous since it isn't the same one as on the virus itself? The dangerous...
...spike protein IS the one on the virus itself and was the inspiration for the name of the family of virus being "Coronavirus," since the spikes resemble a crown and "corona" is Spanish for "crown."
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(