Remember like two months ago when many people on here were saying Joe Biden's approval rating would be a stable +10 because something something polarization?
The Xenocrypt Policy of never predicting anything specific pays off yet again. Image
Now it's equally easy to say, oh it'll bounce back, or oh it'll be underwater forever. Why are people so confident about these things. Based on what.
Well I do think Trump's stable low approvals were some combination of the median voter never much liking him to begin with, plus polling issues. But you can't lose what you never had.
Most Presidents are, you know, popular when they're elected, so they have the approval of the median voter, so they can lose it. Of course you're more "stable" if you didn't really even start out with that.
The analogy might be, if Biden has unusually small midterm losses--because he had an unusually small number of seats for a trifecta to begin with.
Anyway I'm not saying Biden's approval rating won't go back up. Historically it does seem easier for approval to go down than up, but we're not exactly in normal times...on either side of things...
You know, maybe Delta will finally fade and we'll get that sweet hot economy and normalcy. Or maybe the Omega Variant will come along and destroy even the capacity of our brains to experience pleasure. (Twitter will look the same as it does now, hey-yooo.)
Well it is unlikely that "everyone hates both". It may be that the median voters do dislike both Biden and Republicans, in which case, much will depend on how they split, as has been the case before.
It's a little under-appreciated that someone with 40-60 approval running against someone with 30-70 approval is in many ways in the same boat. They're both scrounging among the 30% (say) "disapprove of both". The 40-60 candidate needs fewer of them but may be some similarities...
As opposed to say, someone with 55-45 approval vs. someone with 45-55 approval. Same delta on their approvals, but the dynamics are probably a lot more different. Of course IDK if this actually has any historical meaning empirically, just musing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Xenocrypt

Xenocrypt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @xenocryptsite

24 Sep
I believe statistically, older people score higher on political knowledge tests than young people, as a whole.
"As a whole" means, of course, that any individual older person may be very wrong in condescending to any individual younger person.
As would be the case regardless of their respective knowledge levels, of course. Don't be condescending to anyone!
Read 7 tweets
24 Sep
I mean nothing mentioned in the replies by definition.
At this point I feel like the contrarian for thinking "Avatar" is a good, innovative movie that used its effects in interesting ways that have not been duplicated since.
Like "Avatar" gets the audience lost in CGI-land to mirror the protagonist getting lost in his, well, avatar. It's the title and everything.
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
My blazing hot take is video game movies don't do that well because people like the act of playing a video game and not the specific characters really.
As @ScottMendelson has pointed out, movies that use video game imagery or mechanics can do well, but video game adaptations are a long string of losses.
"Detective Pikachu" did ok but I don't think they were quite pleased with $433m worldwide on a $150m budget. Also sidenote, I glanced at the plot summary and it seemed to be a "how is this even legal" ripoff of "Zootopia".
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
Yeah eventually someone will figure out how to write or edit a streaming show and we'll be in business.
I mean I'm kind of kidding, kind of not. I think almost every streaming show/miniseries I watch, I would struggle to call any of them like, a real solid screenplay start-to-finish. But it is a youngish medium. Maybe we'll get there. We have to demand it first, I think.
Or we can act like "The White Lotus" is the most we can expect. You'll take your obviously padded rough draft and you'll like it!
Read 7 tweets
22 Sep
The whole "Black/female James Bond" thing is part of a set of controversies that interest me, which are basically like, "how much does a story need to revolve around 'Demographic X Issues' to 'represent' Demographic X".
EG would or should a "Black James Bond" movie be about like, Africa, or police brutality, or whatever, or would it just be "No Time To Die but with David Oyelowo".
Both options would probably cause some complaining online, and probably with some justification either way.
Read 7 tweets
22 Sep
Oh right Ezra Miller was a Dumbledore after that endless terrible movie about which aristocratic bloodline he was from.
Or I saw some fans like "he's not a Dumbledore, Grindelwald was lying", exciting me for the prospect of a SECOND movie about just which aristocratic bloodline Ezra Miller is from, again with onscreen family trees and multiple archival visits.
Zoë Kravitz's ghost sobbing that she actually switched the babies a second time as her ship was sinking.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(