"As a whole" means, of course, that any individual older person may be very wrong in condescending to any individual younger person.
As would be the case regardless of their respective knowledge levels, of course. Don't be condescending to anyone!
There's also IIRC some interesting papers that say women have lower political knowledge by conventional measures, but possibly higher knowledge of actual government programs they might use.
Or also, women may be more likely to admit they don't know and less willing to guess, which can distort things? I had a thread once.
A lot of people are saying "oh not if you define political knowledge the RIGHT way, the way where demographics that agree with me on average are also more knowledgeable on average". Which, IDK, maybe.
IMO an important part of like maturity is recognizing that there are people who are happier than you, more successful than you, who could run rings around you in any number of general knowledge or ability tests, who also might hold every combination of crackpot or wrong beliefs.
I mean yeah at no point did I say this should give older people any special privileges or anything. It does in practice, though, like it or not, at least since I assume it's related to how they vote more.
I did not say, note, that conservatives score higher than liberals/left-wing people. (I'm with the olds on not caring about that distinction frankly.) IIRC it all evens out maybe because education cuts one way and age cuts the other way.
Do you have this table by party @davidshor or is it just from the CCES.
At this point I feel like the contrarian for thinking "Avatar" is a good, innovative movie that used its effects in interesting ways that have not been duplicated since.
My blazing hot take is video game movies don't do that well because people like the act of playing a video game and not the specific characters really.
As @ScottMendelson has pointed out, movies that use video game imagery or mechanics can do well, but video game adaptations are a long string of losses.
"Detective Pikachu" did ok but I don't think they were quite pleased with $433m worldwide on a $150m budget. Also sidenote, I glanced at the plot summary and it seemed to be a "how is this even legal" ripoff of "Zootopia".
I mean I'm kind of kidding, kind of not. I think almost every streaming show/miniseries I watch, I would struggle to call any of them like, a real solid screenplay start-to-finish. But it is a youngish medium. Maybe we'll get there. We have to demand it first, I think.
Or we can act like "The White Lotus" is the most we can expect. You'll take your obviously padded rough draft and you'll like it!
The whole "Black/female James Bond" thing is part of a set of controversies that interest me, which are basically like, "how much does a story need to revolve around 'Demographic X Issues' to 'represent' Demographic X".
EG would or should a "Black James Bond" movie be about like, Africa, or police brutality, or whatever, or would it just be "No Time To Die but with David Oyelowo".
Both options would probably cause some complaining online, and probably with some justification either way.
Or I saw some fans like "he's not a Dumbledore, Grindelwald was lying", exciting me for the prospect of a SECOND movie about just which aristocratic bloodline Ezra Miller is from, again with onscreen family trees and multiple archival visits.
Zoë Kravitz's ghost sobbing that she actually switched the babies a second time as her ship was sinking.
Remember like two months ago when many people on here were saying Joe Biden's approval rating would be a stable +10 because something something polarization?
The Xenocrypt Policy of never predicting anything specific pays off yet again.
Now it's equally easy to say, oh it'll bounce back, or oh it'll be underwater forever. Why are people so confident about these things. Based on what.