The whole "Black/female James Bond" thing is part of a set of controversies that interest me, which are basically like, "how much does a story need to revolve around 'Demographic X Issues' to 'represent' Demographic X".
EG would or should a "Black James Bond" movie be about like, Africa, or police brutality, or whatever, or would it just be "No Time To Die but with David Oyelowo".
Both options would probably cause some complaining online, and probably with some justification either way.
I feel like sometimes movies or shows try to do both, have a character who "just happens to be queer/Black/female", but give them one awkward speech or episode about discrimination and hardship. IDK if that's the best approach.
The solution is probably just like, you know, the same as always. Do good writing.
For example "Spy", already a great "female James Bond" movie, Melissa McCarthy has specific issues that are certainly related to being a woman, but not JUST "she's a a woman", and they're not forced in, they're what the movie is about.
For writing a gay character, there's a path between "ctrl-f 'girlfriend' replace 'boyfriend'" and having someone necessarily be disowned by their parents or have a big speech about how they can't hold hands in public or whatever.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At this point I feel like the contrarian for thinking "Avatar" is a good, innovative movie that used its effects in interesting ways that have not been duplicated since.
My blazing hot take is video game movies don't do that well because people like the act of playing a video game and not the specific characters really.
As @ScottMendelson has pointed out, movies that use video game imagery or mechanics can do well, but video game adaptations are a long string of losses.
"Detective Pikachu" did ok but I don't think they were quite pleased with $433m worldwide on a $150m budget. Also sidenote, I glanced at the plot summary and it seemed to be a "how is this even legal" ripoff of "Zootopia".
I mean I'm kind of kidding, kind of not. I think almost every streaming show/miniseries I watch, I would struggle to call any of them like, a real solid screenplay start-to-finish. But it is a youngish medium. Maybe we'll get there. We have to demand it first, I think.
Or we can act like "The White Lotus" is the most we can expect. You'll take your obviously padded rough draft and you'll like it!
Or I saw some fans like "he's not a Dumbledore, Grindelwald was lying", exciting me for the prospect of a SECOND movie about just which aristocratic bloodline Ezra Miller is from, again with onscreen family trees and multiple archival visits.
Zoë Kravitz's ghost sobbing that she actually switched the babies a second time as her ship was sinking.
Remember like two months ago when many people on here were saying Joe Biden's approval rating would be a stable +10 because something something polarization?
The Xenocrypt Policy of never predicting anything specific pays off yet again.
Now it's equally easy to say, oh it'll bounce back, or oh it'll be underwater forever. Why are people so confident about these things. Based on what.