Today, the @DCMS & @OfficeforAI publish the UK’s #NationalAIStrategy, which supersedes the AI Sector Deal, last updated in 2019. Important takeaways 👇
1/10
This new strategy represents an important articulation of the UK’s ambitions to cultivate and harness the power of AI. It provides welcome detail on the Government’s proposed approach to AI investment, and their plans to grow the UK's AI research & commercial sector.
2/10
It highlights areas in urgent need of further policy thinking and development on AI governance, and makes a commitment to addressing this gap.
The Strategy notes the challenges associated with regulating AI, and surveys some of the different regulatory approaches that could be taken but, crucially, remains agnostic on which might work best for the UK.
Instead, it asks whether the UK current approach to AI regulation is adequate, and commits to set out in an early 2022 white paper ‘the risks and harms posed by AI technologies and our [the UK Govt’s] proposal to address them’.
This would be the first step to ensuring the UK does not get left behind other parts of the world that have already started laying out plans for the regulation of AI. But it is a tall order by early next year.
The questions that still need to be answered are huge:
🔹What should the goal of AI regulation be?
🔹Do AI systems require bespoke regulation, or can the regulation of these systems be wrapped into broader digital technology regulatory package?
7/10
🔹Should government create a single AI regulator, or empower existing regulatory bodies with the capacity and resources to present coordinated positions on these systems?
As an organisation working on different aspects of these questions over the past year, the @AdaLovelaceInst looks forward to working with @OfficeforAI and others to help inform the ongoing conversation around how best to regulate AI.
If the UK wants to live up to its stated ambition of becoming an AI superpower, it will need a regulatory framework and strategy that ensures international coordination, builds public confidence and protects against risks to people and society.
📢NEW: The @AdaLovelaceInst, @AINowInstitute & @opengovpart have partnered on the first global study of the regulations and policy tools governing the use of algorithms in the public sector.
Governments across the world are using algorithms to automate decisions, but there's growing evidence that these systems can cause harm, frequently lack transparency and are implemented often without public input.
2/5
In response, regulators, lawmakers and civil society orgs have turned to regulatory and policy tools to ensure that these algorithms are held accountable.
Our report analyses these fast-emerging and evolving responses. bit.ly/AlgorithmicTra…
3/5
📚It's the second of three annual reading weeks at @AdaLovelaceInst.
This is time for the whole team to step back from emailing and Zooming to replenish our stores of knowledge.
Here are some of the books on our list. What else should we be reading?👇
1⃣Cyber Republic: Reinventing democracy in the age of intelligent machines by @zarkadakis.
How to make liberal democracies more inclusive and the digital economy more equitable: a guide for the coming Fourth Industrial Revolution. mitpress.mit.edu/books/cyber-re…
2⃣ Silicon Values: The future of free speech under surveillance capitalism by @jilliancyork.
As NHS trials new contact tracing app, new report by @AdaLovelaceInst & @traversepeople finds the public want to see evidence it works alongside independent oversight.
Over three weeks in May 2020, the @AdaLovelaceInst, @traversepeople, @involveUK & @BangtheTable convened a rapid online discussion with 28 members of the public to explore attitudes to the use of #COVID19 related technologies for transitioning out of lockdown.
The 'mini public' debated circumstances under which the use of tech like the contact tracing app would be an appropriate part of the #COVID19 response.
Join @sarahdrinkwater, @thomasmhughes and @safiyanoble at 17:00 BST to explore:
🔹what is ‘good’?
🔹who is responsible for ‘good’?
🔹how can we embed ‘good’ into structures and processes to make tech work for people and society?
1⃣ @safiyanoble speak for those most vulnerable & those in crosshairs of technology design pay the highest price. We are living in a moment of #BlackLivesMatter outpouring through technology and people using technology to protest, connect, bolster calls for police accountability.
2⃣ We have to talk about the implications of technologies. But does ethics defang and undermine the political implications of technology's responsibility for real harms: being the vessels, microphones, amplifiers for calls for hate and harms? And defangs a structural analysis?
The Ada Lovelace Institute Ethics & Society Stage kicks off at 10am this morning with 'Do we need more WEIRDos in Whitehall' with @ChiOnwurah@Jackstilgoe@JeniT and @JohnNaughton
We'll be pulling out key points from the discussion in the thread below 👇
'We have passed peak trust' says @ChiOnwurah and Goverment missing tricks on data sharing, transparency, protecting digital citizens. She calls for a digital charter that empowers citizens and builds an ecosystem of digital governance.
Whitehall needs diversity of thought, expertise and people in Whitehall that believe in empowering citizens, bringing agency to lives and futures, not something WEIRDos will bring but can be achieved by opening up Whitehall and minds to an active view of technology in society.
The UK Government wants to roll out a digital #ContactTracing app in 2-3 weeks.
Building on our rapid evidence review, we've outlined the steps needed to make an app trustworthy, before it’s deployed. #ExitThroughTheAppStore#COVID19