Analysis of the results of the 1st three yrs of NHMRC Investigator Grants has revealed that gender equity is not being addressed adequately. Analysis of the $ funded per person has revealed L1 basic women received ~ $500K less than men. These are lab heads 10-15 yrs post-PhD. 1/5
Yesterday I asked Twitter researchers what it would mean for your research if you received $500K extra in funding over 5 yrs. The responses were largely from researchers of the level that this fellowship targets. You can read the responses here👇🏻
There were 12 women & 30 men awarded L1 basic science fellowships in the last 3 yrs. These $ differences occurred in each year. This is a significant loss for these women who will not be able to do some of the research they could if they had been awarded equal $ to the men. 3/5
The L1 funding demonstrates a pattern that has been recognised- that women receive less funding than men. Yet this is not taken into account in peer review, it is assumed productivity is based on excellence. If you receive $500K less it’s harder to achieve the same outputs. 4/5
In both 2020 and 2021, only one basic science woman researcher was awarded an L2 (15-20 years post-PhD) fellowship. The L1 funding outcomes helps to highlight why this loss of women is occurring. It should not be happening & it’s time for action to prevent it continuing. 5/5
Additional data analysis of the NHMRC Investigator Grants (2019-2021 outcomes) are here. I have separated out all disciplines and show them here separately.
First though, here is an average of the amount of funding received in total per year for men vs. women. $301.5M more to men
Now for the summaries in each disciplines in ea yr. Top=#, bottom= $ funded.
Post-PhD (or equivalent) the levels are: EL1: <5 yrs; EL2: 5-10 yrs; L1: 10-15 yrs; L2: 15-20 yrs; L3: >20 yrs.
Also note that a sig # of women were funded under the cut off score.
Basic science here 👇🏻
Clinical medicine and science here 👇🏻 Note that the scales for all disciplines are the same to enable a clear comparison.
Public health here 👇🏻
Health services research here 👇🏻. Apologies to non-binary, only one awardee at EL1 in each of the first three yrs of this scheme (discipline unknown).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today is @UN International Day of Women and Girls in Science. In 2022 it’s time to shift the focus from recruitment (which is not the main issue) to retention (which is an ongoing problem). This is the current situation in Australia👇🏻, lack of funding of women the biggest cause.
In 2022 it’s time for change & time for a commitment from funding agencies & workplaces to prevent women from leaving academia (or from being stalled in their career, working for others). We are losing too many #WomeninSTEMM who are fantastic role models, leaders and mentors.
We (Equity in Australian STEMM) analysed the recent funding outcomes from NHMRC, the major Aus government source of funding for medical & health STEMM researchers. We submitted our position paper to NHMRC last year, the link is here, 🙏 @FranklinWomen ♥️ franklinwomen.com.au/wp-content/upl…
Today the Equity in Australian STEMM team sent @nhmrc@ceo_nhmrc & members of NHMRC council our position paper re gendered outcomes in NHMRC funding. We focused our analyses on the 1st 3 yrs of the new scheme, comparing outcomes for Investigator, Ideas & Synergy Grants. 🧵1/20
First, let’s recap the issue. For decades recruitment of women into most Australian STEMM disciplines has not been an issue. More women are in STEMM than men at the PhD & postdoc level👇🏻. Then there’s a sharp drop from lab head level & few women Professors compared to men. 2/20
In 2015-2018 women were awarded 43% of NHMRC fellowships (salary only), most $ going to the early career women, with few mid-career (MCR) & fewer senior women funded. In 2019 these were replaced by Investigator Grants, 5 yr $ also providing salaries of staff & lab expenses.👇🏻3/20
NHMRC Investigator Grant outcomes were announced today. Congratulations to those successful, commiserations to those who were not. Total $ awarded here👇🏻 This 🧵 shows the breakdown of gender & disciplines in ea of the 5 fellowship levels (no data provided for non-binary) 1/6.
These are the results for EL1. Most recipients were academic level A/B/C. One clinical male was level D as was one health services research woman. 2/6.
These are the results for EL2 recipients. All academic levels A/B/C except for the following: Clinical: men: 1 level E, 8 level D, women: 4 level D.
Basic: men: 1 level D.
Public health: women: 5 level D. Health services research: men: 1 level E, 3 level D, women: 1 level D. 3/6.
Advice for junior lab heads on how to maintain productivity for future yrs (thanks @FZMarques for the thread suggestion, everyone pls add on any tips you think of that I overlook!). Thread 1/15
1st, congrats on becoming a lab head! You may have only just started your own lab or have had a lab for a while now but it is a steep learning curve irrespective & having support (mentorship, sponsorship) will make it easier to navigate. Seek this out. 2/15
We all have different leadership styles and continue to learn in leading. Take a leadership course when you can, as soon as you can (many are even available online). Ask your workplace to support you in this- these are valuable & should be compulsory for all lab heads IMO. 3/15
In the current climate I thought I would tweet more advice for researchers (esp #EMCRs) who may be stressed about the current situation & what #workingfromhome might mean for their productivity. I have already tweeted on critiquing a paper. This is for those who have data. 1/10
With no wet lab expts possible during lockdown, go thru your data thoroughly. Catch up on analysis if you are behind (a common scenario!). If you need specialised licensed software many of these have opened up public access due to #COVID19 so you can access from home. 2/10
If you haven’t already, start compiling graphs of your data. Start putting ea graph into a Fig (for thesis/manuscript). Each Fig should tell a cohesive part of your story. Look at ea Fig & decide if any data is needed to complete the Fig (more expt replicates, other expts) 3/10
Time for a thread, this is for #ECRchat#AcademicChatter tips for new graduate students/post-docs in the current #COVID19 climate, esp those #workingfromhome. First, stay calm. We are all in this together, we will get through this. Priorities are to be safe, happy & healthy. 1/16
There are many things you can do from home (note- you will need a device & internet access for the majority, if you don’t then access printed copies of publications). This is for grad students/post-docs starting in a new field but may be useful for all. First, read papers. 2/16
Start by reading reviews in your research topic. Your lab head is a start, either their own or suggestions. If you don’t know how to access papers, find out what electronic platform your research field regularly uses to search for publications with key words. Mine is PubMed. 3/16