@dgurdasani1 Yes and idea it will evolve to mild is based on 4 coronaviruses. 229E + NL63 may have a common ancestory around the year 1100.
+ we don't know for sure any were originally serious or if so how long they took to become mild.
My summary:
Graphic from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
@dgurdasani1 Timescale of 1-2 years comes from flu, a very different virus. Some think the pandemic in 1889 was OC43 but evidence is weak, could easily be just another flu pandemic. Polio, smallpox, measles, don't change virulence after decades of evolution. No experience from coronaviruses.
@dgurdasani1 If OC43 was always mild and pandemic in 1889 was flu - that eliminates the only observational evidence for rapid loss of virulence.
We noticed SARS / COVID / MERS because serious.
Suppose HKU1 was recent and always mild?
+ COVID could be the exception. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
@dgurdasani1 I mean - they might be right but it's often said with a lot of confidence, when you look at the evidence they have it is very weak indeed, on both timescale and whether the end result is less severe. It's certainly not enough to plan policy around it.
@dgurdasani1 Question. Apart from flu (a very different disease), is there any other case of a deadly human disease that evolves to be mild on a timescale of 1-2 years?
@dgurdasani1 More on evolution of coronaviruses. HKU1 is now though to have crossed to humans in the 1950s. cell.com/action/showPdf…
It was likely milder than COVID since we'd have notice a disease as serious as COVID even back then. IFR about 3 in 1000 for 1950s USA. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.11…
@dgurdasani1 Modern virulence theory sees virulence as a trade off. For SARS-CoV2, decreased virulence might not have much advantage because severe symptoms and death occur at > 14 days.
Meanwhile increased virulence may be associated with increased transmissibility early on in disease.
@dgurdasani1 They discuss the avirulence theory. But they observe that specializing in colonizing the upper respiratory tract might increase transmission, and reduce severity. The D614G variant however seems to have increased affinity for URT but without reducing its affinity for the LRT.
@dgurdasani1 They also mention one variant of interest that seems to have increased transmissibility although it has more affinity for the lower respiratory tract. They speculate it might achieve this by evading nasal swabs, so Test Trace Isolate may be an evolutionary pressure to move to LRT
1/ Most deaths start after 14 days. Evolution favours more infectiousness. Almost no pressure to reduce death.
@dgurdasani1 2/ HKU1 may have been mild all along.
No evidence of acute pandemic of HKU1 in 1950s
Other coronaviruses had centuries of evolution.
@dgurdasani1 3/ Three possible scenarios for trade off of virulence & transmission rate.
So far virulence of COVID is increasing. Trade offs could mean it becomes more virulent as a side effect of the increased viral loads to become more transmissible. Or delta might be most virulent it gets
@dgurdasani1 4/ COVID could get milder by specializing
in infecting upper respiratory tract
- more transmissible & immune
response weaker
However D614G increases load in URT
without reducing loads in LRT.
One VOI infects lower respiratory tracts, perhaps to evade nasal swabs.
@dgurdasani1 5/ COVID could become less virulent by infecting kids when it's less severe so adults are already immune.
However immunity from COVID is short lived.
When variants evolve to escape immunity, this may not reduce virulence.
@dgurdasani1 This shows the importance of the WHO advice to continue with public health measures and #DOITALL to stop emergence of variants and keep transmission down as we DON'T KNOW how this virus will evolve. debunkingdoomsday.quora.com/Yes-we-can-sti…
@dgurdasani1 So, we need to do better than "live with it".
Marvellous 2nd & 3rd generation vaccines on the way.
WHO say we can tame this virus - endemic but low prevalence.
No need for COVID to be hyperendemic like flu, killing thousands every year.
To get all the world to 40% requires 2 billion doses.
Projected global supply 1.5 billion doses.
But COVAX supply forecasts have fallen 25% because of booster programs in wealthy economies.
This is why WHO are calling for a moratorium on boosters. 1/n
Limited data on safety & efficacy of boosters.
No emergency approval by FDA / WHO etc.
WHO continue to monitor situation.
Based on data so far, their advice is that the global priority is to supply first doses to weaker economies.
Photo: nara.getarchive.net/media/us-army-… 2/x
Summarizing press briefing on boosters.
Low rates of COVID deaths with high vaccination.
High rates in countries with low doses.
COVAX downgraded supply 25%
@DocLT2 Yes indeed. Many reinfections already, some within a few weeks. bnonews.com/index.php/2020…
Coronaviruses often reinfect. This shows infections of one individual by 4 coronaviruses from blood sample antibodies. Each black dot = inferred infection. nature.com/articles/s4159… 1/2
@DocLT2 This is steady state after centuries to 1000 years evolution without vaccines.
With COVID it's only just leapt to humans.
This was written just before alpha was detected. In last sentence, didn't expect variants to evade immunity so soon with COVID. nature.com/articles/s4159… 2/3
@DocLT2 It's very limited data for coronavirus colds - they surely are just as complex as COVID and more so but we barely see the tip of the iceberg of the complexity.
Interesting situation, Novavax is first vaccine sent to WHO for approval first - stronger economies saturated in vaccines, so, much less interest in developing new vaccines.
Novavax also very good at transfer of technology and first deliver of 100 million doses is to COVAX.
These are the four scenarios they look at.
SSP1-1.9: Zero emissions for 2050+, ~1.4 °C long term
SSP1-2.6: Zero for 2070+, ~1.8 °C
SSP2-4.5: Low emissions by 2100, ~2.9 °C
SSP2-7.0: Double emissions by 2100, ~3.6 °C
SSP2-8.6: Double emissions by 2050, ~4.4 °C
Westminster gov. failed to bring the virus under control & is now preparing to remove the last few remaining measures that inhibit it from spreading even more widely amongst our only partially vaccinated population.
International COVID experts respond:
Almost 50,000 cases per day
Only half fully vaccinated.
Expect many millions infected over summer.
UK gov. has chosen to do this even though we have effective vaccines.
We ask experts to respond
New Zealand: Always looked to UK for leadership
Remarkable depth of scientific knowledge.
Remarkable clinical trials we are drawing on.
Incredible development of vaccines & rollout.
Astounded you are doing this despite amazing expertise you have in UK.
Headlines about solar storm headed for Earth are fake news. There was an X-class flare that caused some over the horizon radio blackouts on July 3 - few people use long wave radio now.
Solar flares and solar storms do nothing to the internet (connected via optical fibre) or cell phones (connected via direct microwave transmission). They can cause short term glitches in GPS.
Once per century solar storms may cause powercuts, in particular places depending on local geology and lengths of power lines, indistinguishable from ones we get anyway - surges could affect old model step up down transformers or near end of their life.