Share this page!

Steve Analyst Profile picture
Twitter logo
25 Sep, 5 tweets, 1 min read
I still remember the referendum talking about how the £ might drop and being told "That's good for exporters".

And it was good for exporting labour.

It was also bad for importing labour.
Having a strong £ was a really good thing when it came to solving this crisis, and I've yet to hear someone making this connection, but it's not one that wasn't made at the time.

It was a comparative advantage in a free market for labour and Brexit got rid of that comparative advantage.

And they cheered as it went down. That was the mentality of these people.
There is a driver shortage across Europe.
We had a comparative advantage.
Brexit removed that comparative advantage.

Some people need to do the...very basic maths...on that one.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Steve Analyst

Steve Analyst Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmporersNewC

Steve Analyst Profile picture
25 Sep
Matt did 2 minutes of research and believes that claiming Brexit was the main driver is stupid.

I read through every single Freight Transport Association skills shortage report and investigated the issues in the US, Poland and Germany.

Claiming you know it wasn't is stupid.
Claiming you know it wasn't after 2 minutes of research is just ridiculously stupid.
Germany has a problem. One the big drivers was the loss of national service. 10 years ago 20% of their drivers had got their qualifications in the army.
Read 7 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
24 Sep
Personally, I don’t agree with a lot of this by @julianHjessop. There is a whole question that has to be answered with regard the state of the transport industry going into the pandemic, and so far I have not seen it asked or answered.

(Thread: Part 1).
Please take note, Julian is my favourite Brexit economist who makes his arguments on proper economic principles, and therefore, please do not abuse him. I am, as he has done at other times before to other people, simply scrutinising his work.
Firstly, the article asks if Remainers can say they were right, and so I looked into what we actually said.
Read 44 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
16 Sep
My two penneth is that if China join CPTPP then digital provisions in trade deals becomes even more superflous than they were before.
THE reason that CPTPP has digital provisions is because Japan wanted to ensure that other countries in its region didn't adopt the digital protectionism of China.
Cue a lot of people getting excited about digital provisions and how new trade deals are better with them, despite the fact they largely involve promising to not do something that nobody was going to do.
Read 11 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
24 Aug
I don't know about you, but I'm beginning to see a pattern here. (Thread)
Boris Johnson admitted at college he did cocaine, and then said he wasn't sure what it was, and the said he didn't actually inhale.

Which is well known politician language for "I snorted my tits off".
Michael Gove has admitted he has taken it on several occasions, which in Gove language could mean anything from doing it s few time to heading a drug cartel and trying to push kids into taking smack.
Read 30 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
22 Aug
Good news! We can now try and recruit software engineers from India to pick our crop and drive our HGVs.
And what a polished political line that "Indian Software Engineer" was.

Both appealing to people's Empire fetish and trying to pretend ending FoM was nothing to do with racism.
"We don't have to take" - We did have to take. Not because people were being forced onto us, but because we had the jobs to do the work that needed to be done.
Read 6 tweets
Steve Analyst Profile picture
18 Aug
This is all true, apart from the fact the campaign was supposed to have ended in 1982, and it was the least extraordinary thing ever.

They took Ireland to court because Ireland told them to.

(Thread)

In 1975 the problems with a “Buy British” campaign were clear. How do you establish what is British? What proportion is British? Is it branded British and foreign? Is it even available from a British company? Image
When Ireland started a three-year campaign on the 18th January 1978, they had thought about all of these problems and came up with intelligent practical solutions.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @EmporersNewC has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @EmporersNewC!

Read all threads by @EmporersNewC

:(