Uttar Pradesh Court, Bulandshahar rejects bail plea of Man named “Osama”, accused of raping and sexually assaulting a 14 year old girl.
Court finds that prima facie, Osama has raped the minor girl.
Court rejects contention that it was a conspiracy against Osama & family.
Special Judge (POCSO), Bulandshahar was hearing Osama’s bail plea in which he argued that the case was falsely made up to harass him. #Minors
An FIR was registered by girl's father stating that Osama and his family members were known to his family and Osama took his daughter to a hotel room deceptively, where he made her drink a cold drink after which she fainted and he committed rape on her.
Later on, when the girl woke up and threatened to scream, Osama dropped her near a Masjid saying that if she tells anyone about the crime, he will murder her family.
However, the girl told her family members about the rape, and her father got the FIR registered.
In her statement under Section 161, Cr.PC victim girl has stated the same.
Court noted that it appears from the records that Osama conspired with his friends to intoxicate the minor girl and to establish sexual relations with her.
Court held that the girl is 14 years old and has been sexually assaulted. #Minors
"Girl pleaded multiple times but accused didn't let her go": Uttar Pradesh Court rejects bail of man accused of raping & sexually assaulting teen
#SupremeCourt to hear application filed in PIL relating to banning the use of certain chemicals in the fireworks by the manufacturers.
Earlier, the Court had issued notice in the application filed by three infants over the issue of degradation of air quality.
Sr Adv Atmaram NS Nadkarni appearing for the Association of Fire Crackers Manufacturers.
Justice Shah- We don't want bursting of fire crackers in the Court room, one by one we'll give opportunity. Otherwise also I'm afraid of fire crackers.
#DelhiHighCourt hearing plea seeking directions to NDMC to avail the benefit of Rs 10,000 under PM Atmanirbhar Nidhi Scheme given to the vendors whose name appears on NDMC portal.
Bench- There cannot be a grant of loan compulsorily. There is bound to be an application from a person seeking loan.
Petitioner- Here the respondent will not give loan.
Bench observes “This is not a public Interest Litigation but a Publicity Interest Litigation”
No loan can be granted without proper data and application. We see no reason to entertain this writ petition.
Crucial Hearing in Supreme Court on Bengal Violence issue today:
Top Court will hear the appeal by @MamataOfficial Government against a Calcutta HC order which handed over serious crimes such as rape, crimes against women which occurred during #postpollviolence to CBI.
According to the West Bengal Government before Supreme Court, the CBI will be biased as it runs at behest of Centre & that the NHRC Committee report is "misleading".
Read West Bengal Government's take: lawbeat.in/top-stories/be…
Hearing Begins.
A bench led by Justice Saran in hearing the #BengalViolence case.
Kapil Sibal is for the West Bengal Government.
He tells Court that the case will take the whole day today for hearing and it will even take up tomorrow, perhaps.
#CalcuttaHighCourt shortly to pronounce judgment in the matter pertaining to controversial appointment of BJP turncoat Mukul Roy as the Chairman of Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly. #WestBengal
Sitting MLA from Kalyani Constituency in Nadia district of Kolkata, Mr. Ambika Roy has moved Calcutta High Court challenging Mukul Roy’s appointment. #CalcuttaHighCourt#WestBengal
It's been argued that despite winning West Bengal Assembly elections as a member of BJP as soon as the results were declared Mukul Roy defected to the present ruling party All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) without resigning from the BJP or his Membership from the Assembly.
Delhi HC observations on DELHI RIOTs: CONDUCT OF PROTESTORS SHOW CALCULATED ATTEMPT TO DISLOCATE FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT, RIOTS DID NOT TAKE PLACE IN “SPUR OF THE MOMENT
The systematic disconnection and destruction of CCTV cameras also confirms the existence of a pre- planned and pre-meditated conspiracy to disturb law and order in the city: DELHI HC on #DelhiRiots
Faizabad Court rejects bail plea of Man named “Rohit Pathak” accused of killing his wife with an electric shock after his and his family’s demands for Dowry were not met.
Court said post mortem revealed innumerable torture marks & electric shock given which led to death.
The court also observed that the incident took place within 7 years of marriage as the couple tied not on 29/1/15 and the wife died on 14/5/21.
Court further noted that, the incident of death due to electric shock was of serious nature while dismissing the bail application.
The complainant is the father of the victim, who in his FIR stated that the in-laws used to torture his daughter and demand money from her on a daily basis.
As per him, on 14/5/2021 the in-laws with husband gave his daughter an electric shock, due to which she died.