#SupremeCourt to hear application filed in PIL relating to banning the use of certain chemicals in the fireworks by the manufacturers.
Earlier, the Court had issued notice in the application filed by three infants over the issue of degradation of air quality.
Sr Adv Atmaram NS Nadkarni appearing for the Association of Fire Crackers Manufacturers.
Justice Shah- We don't want bursting of fire crackers in the Court room, one by one we'll give opportunity. Otherwise also I'm afraid of fire crackers.
Sr Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan mentioning about the application listed before the Court.
Justice Shah- We'll hear everything after 2:00 PM
ASG Aishwarya Bhati submits that our affidavit may be taken up in which we have mentioned about the green crackers and what is the way forward.
Justice Shah- We'll hear everything...
Nadkarni, mentioning about the Green crackers.
Justice Shah- We cannot permit to play with the right to life of others. Our prime focus is the right to life of innocent persons.
Justice Shah further added that It is a problem in our country, we have laws but they are not implemented, we want that our orders must be implemented in true spirit.
Another Counsel mentioning whether his part heard matter will be taken?
Justice Shah- No, we'll take it later, this is more important otherwise they will not celebrate Diwali.
Sankaranarayanan submits that various direction has been passed, one is that no dealer licenses will be given, the second was with reference to transport of Firecrackers. We ordered one and the box is just behind me...
Justice Shah- It is very difficult to keep it in your office
Sankaranarayanan added that milords I have a fire extinguisher as well.
Sankaranarayanan- Despite a long rope given to the manufacturers they are violating again and again...they are selling it online, despite banning barium they are adding it.
Justice Shah- Give us the orders passed by this Court in a saparate compilation by tomorrow.
Sankaranarayanan says that consistently we are seeing, 300 different types of fire crackers that were banned are still going on...even in Maharashtra these sales are going on.
Sankaranarayanan further added, Milords fire crackers are not something like narcotics that someone will have in bathroom, authorities can easily see it and still nothing is done.
Sankaranarayanan, Milords what is happening is this organization is giving certification to the crackers that has barium.
And there are only 5 types of crackers that are in the category of Green Crackers. That is why these applications need to be heard.
Sankaranarayanan- Playing ball completely with the manufacturers the centre places this affidavit...
Justice Shah- What is the status of NEERI and PESO
Sankaranarayanan- Ladi's were banned, Milords might remember when we were Children and pollution was not a problem everyone used to play with it.
Justice Shah- Everyday there is a violation, those 1000, 10000 Ladi, every religion event, marriages, we'll have to setup liability on someone. Otherwise this will not stop.
Sankaranarayana- Yes, Milords that is exactly what we have said.
Justice Shah- Now, Tomorrow.
This is applicable pan India right?
Sankaranarayanan- Yes Milords everything is pan India.
Justice Shah- No, these roles.
Sankaranarayanan- Yes milords new are not manufactured and old are not sold.
Nadkarni- Yes Milords these are not manufactured
The bench will continue hearing the matter tomorrow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#DelhiHighCourt hearing plea seeking directions to NDMC to avail the benefit of Rs 10,000 under PM Atmanirbhar Nidhi Scheme given to the vendors whose name appears on NDMC portal.
Bench- There cannot be a grant of loan compulsorily. There is bound to be an application from a person seeking loan.
Petitioner- Here the respondent will not give loan.
Bench observes “This is not a public Interest Litigation but a Publicity Interest Litigation”
No loan can be granted without proper data and application. We see no reason to entertain this writ petition.
Crucial Hearing in Supreme Court on Bengal Violence issue today:
Top Court will hear the appeal by @MamataOfficial Government against a Calcutta HC order which handed over serious crimes such as rape, crimes against women which occurred during #postpollviolence to CBI.
According to the West Bengal Government before Supreme Court, the CBI will be biased as it runs at behest of Centre & that the NHRC Committee report is "misleading".
Read West Bengal Government's take: lawbeat.in/top-stories/be…
Hearing Begins.
A bench led by Justice Saran in hearing the #BengalViolence case.
Kapil Sibal is for the West Bengal Government.
He tells Court that the case will take the whole day today for hearing and it will even take up tomorrow, perhaps.
#CalcuttaHighCourt shortly to pronounce judgment in the matter pertaining to controversial appointment of BJP turncoat Mukul Roy as the Chairman of Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly. #WestBengal
Sitting MLA from Kalyani Constituency in Nadia district of Kolkata, Mr. Ambika Roy has moved Calcutta High Court challenging Mukul Roy’s appointment. #CalcuttaHighCourt#WestBengal
It's been argued that despite winning West Bengal Assembly elections as a member of BJP as soon as the results were declared Mukul Roy defected to the present ruling party All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) without resigning from the BJP or his Membership from the Assembly.
Delhi HC observations on DELHI RIOTs: CONDUCT OF PROTESTORS SHOW CALCULATED ATTEMPT TO DISLOCATE FUNCTIONING OF GOVERNMENT, RIOTS DID NOT TAKE PLACE IN “SPUR OF THE MOMENT
The systematic disconnection and destruction of CCTV cameras also confirms the existence of a pre- planned and pre-meditated conspiracy to disturb law and order in the city: DELHI HC on #DelhiRiots
Faizabad Court rejects bail plea of Man named “Rohit Pathak” accused of killing his wife with an electric shock after his and his family’s demands for Dowry were not met.
Court said post mortem revealed innumerable torture marks & electric shock given which led to death.
The court also observed that the incident took place within 7 years of marriage as the couple tied not on 29/1/15 and the wife died on 14/5/21.
Court further noted that, the incident of death due to electric shock was of serious nature while dismissing the bail application.
The complainant is the father of the victim, who in his FIR stated that the in-laws used to torture his daughter and demand money from her on a daily basis.
As per him, on 14/5/2021 the in-laws with husband gave his daughter an electric shock, due to which she died.
Uttar Pradesh Court, Bulandshahar rejects bail plea of Man named “Osama”, accused of raping and sexually assaulting a 14 year old girl.
Court finds that prima facie, Osama has raped the minor girl.
Court rejects contention that it was a conspiracy against Osama & family.
Special Judge (POCSO), Bulandshahar was hearing Osama’s bail plea in which he argued that the case was falsely made up to harass him. #Minors
An FIR was registered by girl's father stating that Osama and his family members were known to his family and Osama took his daughter to a hotel room deceptively, where he made her drink a cold drink after which she fainted and he committed rape on her.