#Lab21 balance sheet. 1/ 80% of the members voted for PR after a long left+right campaign, substantially led by @labourlewis. A few union delegates had power to squash it - but when the time comes to form a Labour-led coalition, if consulted, the members will back it...
2/ So this is a major change in British politics, and driven from below. Defying the bureaucracy the members signalled to other parties they understand: we cannot govern alone, and need urgent constitutional change...
3/ @RachelReevesMP commitment to a £224bn climate investment spend also strategic win - a direct response to the consistent Green polling around 6%. This too is the building block for a governing coalition with Greens/PC/SNP...
4/ The members also won on Green New Deal, Palestine, Aukus... signalling that the party is still substantially a left/centre-left force, despite the leadership and the unions...
5/ Then @AndyMcDonaldMP ‘s resignation over £15 an hour minimum wage places further pressure on the leadership. Everyone knows the next domino to fall would have to be @AngelaRayner and that would bring the structure down... so the members now have leverage...
6/ A further upside. Instead of being a wake, (as it was TBH in 2019, when the game was clearly up with Corbynism), #TWT21 has bounced back and is vibrant, attracting young people, mostly not that committed to Labour as a party or ideology but laser focused on GND...
7/ Plus... Lisa Nandy & John Healey have quietly reinstalled a traditional social-democratic politics in foreign affairs/defence - which is what matters to the centrist swing voters, both on economics and cultural issues... now to the downsides...
8/ The deal I thought we had with Starmer is broken. He is retreating from key pledges - nationalising energy, redistributive income taxes - and facilitating attacks on democracy. There are now no left figures in the Shadow Cabinet... worse...
9/ the Venn diagram where the left and right of the party overlap is moving apart. There is acute cultural and personal dissociation between the “worlds” of the CLP left and the bureaucratic right... it’s already “two parties” ... Keir could have stopped that....
10/ Even in the Kinnock era, the far left would sit in the hotels/fringe and argue with seasoned Cold War right-wingers, all certain they were part of an unbreakable movement with shared cultural values... not any more. There is almost no crossover...
11/ Those who do move between the world of the three course dinners at the Grand and the world of lentil curry at #TWT21 are greeted with hostility in both locations. I mean really bitter, open, personal animosity in both locations...
12/ None of this will improve unless Starmer inspires that part of the left that voted for him, and that means policy commitments and a demonstrable connection with voters... I doubt he can do it in a single speech, because the damage is done over PR/party democracy...
13/ I am now certain, in a way I wasn’t in 2019, that we will end up with a big party realignment in the UK, and that the trigger for it will be a Labour-led coalition that enacts PR... Starmer’s job was to stop this happening by unifying Labour’s warring wings/political cultures
14/ ... but in the short term, patience is running thin with Starmer - absolutely on the left, but increasingly on the right - because the right need someone who can win with the meagre platform they’ve imposed, and it’s not looking very likely...
15/ Dunno how it will pan out but one thing’s clear: Labour conference is an unparalleled theatre of class struggle; the party is no longer a“safe” component of British state infrastructure. That’s bcos of the mass radicalisation of left voters and activists (oh, and networks).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Starmer's rule changes, already watered down, pass by just 53/47... can't see the breakdown but I assume that means constituency vote was even closer or went the other way... huge bonfire of political capital that will only benefit a right-wing challenger ...
2/ ... and given the branch shutdowns, union backroom deals needed to achieve even this, I can see this being reversed fairly easily if the left advances in Unison...
3/ Added to this the Green New Deal motion ruled out of order a week ago just passed. The left needs to create a single Labour entity that new people can join up to and participate in...
Starmer #Marr interview leaves a random selection of Labour faces here in Brighton pretty dour... energy nationalisation is the only possible solution: you can't run the National Grid as a co-op... 1/
2/ Rayner's "scum" comment reflects exactly how working class people talk - and how many voters want to see the super-rich crooks characterised ... yet Keir couldn't bring himself to endorse it...
3/ There's already quite a bit of disquiet over the rule change SNAFU - even among the Labour right... who are rightly obsessed with speaking outside the bubble ...
Labour's NEC is proposing that future leadership candidates need 1/5 of all existing MPs... here's why that should be stopped: 1/ it's designed to stifle the left only... the membership is way to the left of the PLP...
2/ It entrenches machine politics. The PLP is already substantially bereft of people who could feasibly govern, or make a convincing speech - but now all you have to do is network at Westminster...
3/ ... it stifles original voices and ideas: most truly competitive fields - business, the arts, sport - are led by talented misfits with the flair and passion to excel... the list of great potential Labour PMs we never had will grow ...
Labour's attempt to ditch one-member-one-vote is, of course, a massive diversion from the important debates: Green New Deal and constitutional reform... but defeating it is vital... 1/ We're not in the 1970s anymore...
2/ I fought against OMOV in the 90s, because CLPs were sparse, inactive while unions were still (just) activist organisations, whose members could pressure bureaucrats through mass action...
3/ Today, I see OMOV as vital to Labour's transition from a Labourist party to a radical social democracy ... in a networked society, with multiple forms of exploitation, the individual activist should be sovereign...
What's the social-democratic answer to the care crisis? That's the question that should guide Labour today. The answer is 1/ As a universal social need, care should be free at the point of use and funded from general taxation... that's been a Labour value since the year dot...
2/ Nobody is asking Labour to design this on the back of an envelope but to state the principle. It may need a decade to get there, like zero net carbon, but the principle has to be clear... and here's why...
3/ Since health and social care need to integrate, and one is user pays and the other free at the point of use, over time the user pays principle will erode the NHS... so will hypothecation...
First reaction to Johnson's NI rise 1/ It's a clear reversal for the Tory right - Sunak promised before the last election to cut NI... but as a move it's regressive, and attacks the incomes of working age families...
2/ The cap and floors for the wealth grab don't solve the problem: a semi in Newbury sells for 400k, the average house sale in Leigh is a terrace for 112k - so all caps that are not proportional are regressive...
3/ There's nothing in this that improves care quality, availability, or even the fragility of the private care industry...