What's the social-democratic answer to the care crisis? That's the question that should guide Labour today. The answer is 1/ As a universal social need, care should be free at the point of use and funded from general taxation... that's been a Labour value since the year dot...
2/ Nobody is asking Labour to design this on the back of an envelope but to state the principle. It may need a decade to get there, like zero net carbon, but the principle has to be clear... and here's why...
3/ Since health and social care need to integrate, and one is user pays and the other free at the point of use, over time the user pays principle will erode the NHS... so will hypothecation...
4/ The way is now clear philosophically for the Tories to hypothecate all NHS spending, and then turn it into a form of social insurance...
5/ It should be easy enough to oppose the Health and Social Care Levy. It's a new hypothecated tax, and distributionally hits workers and self-employed hardest... the alternative?
6/ Spelled out clearly in Funding Real Change - a Labour NEC Clause V document - a) raise CGT and b) raise tax on dividends... labour.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
7/ You would have to redo the sums of @RNMacqueen given changes to corporation tax since then, and the small dividends tax hike in the H&SL, but this remains the clearest Labour policy on social care spending to date...
8/ In fact the Labour response to H&SC falls into two halves: the NHS spending boost should have come from general taxation - funding the social care cap/ceiling could have come from CGT or dividends as it's only about £5bn of the £36bn
9/ Nobody is calling for Labour to improvise a full alternative budget - but the principles of opposition to the levy should be clear: against hypothecation, against the hit on working families and asset-poor communities...
10/ And it's from those principles that you evolve a short-term alternative: raise CGT, fund the NHS shortfall from general taxation, which has to rise at the top end as (again) proposed by Labour in 2019

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Mason

Paul Mason Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paulmasonnews

7 Sep
First reaction to Johnson's NI rise 1/ It's a clear reversal for the Tory right - Sunak promised before the last election to cut NI... but as a move it's regressive, and attacks the incomes of working age families...
2/ The cap and floors for the wealth grab don't solve the problem: a semi in Newbury sells for 400k, the average house sale in Leigh is a terrace for 112k - so all caps that are not proportional are regressive...
3/ There's nothing in this that improves care quality, availability, or even the fragility of the private care industry...
Read 7 tweets
25 Aug
The US far-right has hailed the Taliban victory. 'They hate what we hate, we can emulate their strategy, they bring closer the global ethnic civil war,' is the sick logic... but the parallels with Saigon are ominous 1/....

medium.com/mosquito-ridge…
2/ The alt-right/Taliban mutual admiration network exists because both forces are philosophically anti-modern, anti-rational and anti-woman... medium.com/mosquito-ridge…
3/ But as @kathleen_belew points out, the parallels with America's defeat in Saigon are more than symbolic. Her study of the White Power movement in the 80s/90s shows defeat in Vietnam was a major impetus for its radicalisation and militarisation medium.com/mosquito-ridge…
Read 7 tweets
17 Aug
The Afghan debacle has re-set US foreign policy - to the narrow defence of US national security. It leaves Johnson’s foreign policy stance in ruins. 1/ In March the UK abandoned 75 years of commitment to defending “rules based international order” …socialeurope.eu/lost-an-empire…
2/ Instead the UK would enter “systemic competition” with Russia and China, aiming to shape the new order in space and cyber, and to duck and dive into the spaces created by US-Russian-China competition…
3/ The implicit assumption, both in defence tech, military structures and geopolitics was that the UK would coat-tail on the USA, and distance itself from Europe… well Biden’s speech just signalled how stupid that assumption was
Read 15 tweets
16 Aug
I saw first hand how liberal interventionism & expeditionary mania ripped thru the political and media elite in 2001: what we should ask for now is simply the admission: we were wrong, its over, never again 1/ paulmasonnews.medium.com/while-you-were…
2/ Today we face much bigger dangers: the Saigon evacuation took place amid effective global stability; the 2020s will see peer rivalry grow - we need to learn the deep lessons of Afghanistan - our political system failed paulmasonnews.medium.com/while-you-were…
3/ There was no vote, no serious scrutiny of the 2001 and 2006 decisions on Afghan deployments. Cabinet failed, Parliament failed, military chiefs failed paulmasonnews.medium.com/while-you-were…
Read 11 tweets
12 Aug
None of the @IPCC_CH geo-social scenarios captures how bad things are... the science is clear, governments still in the grip of a fossil-finance elite that's fragmenting the global system 1/ newstatesman.com/politics/envir…
2/ Reality is heading towards a mix of SSP3-4-&-5 ... unless we force a radical change ... but with what institutions/what allies? newstatesman.com/politics/envir…
3/ Because @johnmcdonnellMP committed to something close to what's needed in 2019, Labour activists got a taste of what's coming to all politicians if they commit to urgent mitigation: fear and incomprehension newstatesman.com/politics/envir…
Read 6 tweets
9 Aug
Tell me again how the market delivers the structural+behavioural change needed to avoid this? #IPCCreport 1/ Short answer: it won't... Image
2/ We need to take control of the #COP26 agenda from below. Simple question for all national leaders: how does your proposed action lead to zero net carbon before 2050? Right now almost none can answer...
3/ ... because the kind of capitalism needed to deliver ZNC is unacceptable to the capitalists who exist, and they have monopolised power, finance, communications and the state...
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(