A point that’s often forgotten by remainers is the key role 🏴 plays in the next Labour govt.
The assumption (probably correct) that SNP wins nearly all 🏴 seats if Tories lose…actually makes 🏴 role in next Labour govt even more crucial…not less.
Here’s why…
The key point is Labour are a 🇬🇧union party. Out of conviction & self interest.
They won’t want to “lose” Scotland. No party wants that on their watch.
So the question is what can Labour offer the most anti Brexit part of the UK that will convince them to not go independent..?
Any coalition that is in anyway dependent on 🏴 seats and particularly on cooperation with the SNP can offer only 1 thing that might avoid 🏴 independence ->
A huge softening of Brexit.
It’s the only thing Labour have got it can give - and its of course what Labour members want.
Will it stop independence?
Maybe, maybe not.
But it’s the last card to play.
And makes perfect sense for other non Tory parties to support.
It’s why I keep banging on about removing Tories 1st - whatever Starmer says now he likely faces v different post election logic in 2024..
It’s not just about delaying a referendum - which may well no longer be possible.
It’s about giving those swing Scots voters a reason to not vote independence when/if a referendum comes…
This is the key.
I’ve seen a few people commenting that SNP “only want independence. End of”.
This may be true - I may even think independence a good thing - but that doesn’t change the thread point.
Labour have only really one thing to offer that could delay 🏴 Indy - undoing a hard Brexit.
The more you think about this the more you realise that - away from the more fevered imaginations of anti Starmer remainers - the pressure a Labour led govt would be under to undo Brexit from the “Scottish angle alone” would be immense & irresistible.
Here’s why..
Imagine for a moment a 2nd 🏴referendum fought during a labour govt in which Labour had not in any meaningful way been shown to have undone big chunks of Brexit.
It would be a bloodbath of the pro-union vote.
In other words:
Labour cannot afford another 🏴referendum on its watch where Labour has not been shown to be anti Brexit in deed.
Labour will need to move fast on this.
Very fast.
It’s why - contrary to what many assume - I’m les interested in the final Labour MP tally in 2024 as in getting Tory seats under 310.
Anything below 310 (or possibly below 315 depending on DUP implosion) = end of hard Brexit momentum.
Regardless what politicians are saying now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s become clear from reports in the last few days that Australia has been deceiving 🇫🇷 for as long as the last 18 months.
Countries can play hard ball on commercials interests - everyone does it, incl. the 🇫🇷.
But such an action by allies on defence pacts is something else.
The upshot of this is the 🇫🇷 will conclude that in foreign policy terms Biden is continuity Trump. But the 🇫🇷 have always been less dewey-eyed about the US anyway.
🇫🇷 will strengthen focus on EU & assume that 🇦🇺 isn’t a serious dependable ally.
What does this mean for 🇬🇧?
The AUKUS stuff will please the anti-EUers but less reported on is how little 🇬🇧 benefits from this. 🇺🇸 will get lion share of any new contract while 🇬🇧, reliant on 🇫🇷 good will for so many things: immigration control, trade flows etc will simply think Britain an reliable sh*t.
Gavin Williamson has informed staff at the Dept for Education that he’s leaving the department.
As part of his demotion he was offered Northern Ireland by Boris Johnson.
The most sensitive job in the most sensitive part of UK at its most sensitive time in its last 2 decades.
I should add this has not been officially confirmed yet - depends if Williamson wants to accept it.
In parliamentary lore “going to Northern Ireland” is not something that usually precedes a stellar rise to the high offices of state. It usually signals the end of a career.
Now hearing that Gavin Williamson turned down Northern Ireland job, which makes Johnson’s reshuffle a bit more complicated.
This could drag on about…perhaps even into tomorrow..
One of the worst debates is the climate change one.
It’s fought on risk/cost but regardless of how bad it turns out much of the cost of going carbon neutral is not really a cost drag but substituting out of resources that make people ill, deform environment & fund awful regimes.
In other words the idea that tackling climate change is a very high cost that’s either worth it or not (depending on your view) is not the whole story.
The benefits of a greener run world are huge even if current climate change projections turn out to be a bit alarmist.
Much of the fraught oil debate resembles people worried about what cutting down on smoking will do to the tobacco industry.
Both tobacco & oil are “deadweight industries” that add little in technological advances & money spent on them could be more productively spent elsewhere.
Conservative internal polling as well as an Electoral Calculus survey has revealed the Tories stand to lose "in excess of 50 seats" to Labour under current polling.
This is an addition to a number of southern seats expected to drop to the LibDems at the next election.
This fits into what ive been saying for sometime:
LibDem top 20 target seats are virtually all Tory held with small margins
Labour focussing on the top 50 Tory held small marginal seats..
..can deliver quite efficiently a change in govt.
Again, as Ive said before,...the trick to using this is for Labour to concentrate on Tory held small margin seats...that Libdems cant win and..
...LibDems to focus on 20-40 Tory held small margin states where LibDems have the better chance than Labour.