It's ace and one of the few things that land in my inbox that I actually read.
8/n
Imagine you have a biotech stock and tomorrow there is an important ruling.
90% chance of bad news.
10% chance of good news.
What price should the stock be trading at?
The fair value is the price at which we expect neither to make money being long or short.
9/n
Remember, write down:
1. All the potential outcomes. 2. The probability of each occurring 3. The payoff if it occurs.
We have 1 and 2. What about 3?
We need to estimate what we think the stock will be worth in each scenario.
10/n
So we need some kind of model for that.
We talk to our analyst when he gets back from lunch.
If there is bad news, he says, the stock is probably worth nothing.
If there is good news, he says, he thinks it is worth about $100.
So we plug those numbers in.
11/n
And assuming our outcome probabilities and estimates of value are "correct", the fair value of the stock is $10.
If it were trading at $10 then we'd don't expect to make long or short the stock.
12/n
If we pay $10 to long the stock then...
90% of the time we'd lose $10
10% of the time we'd win $90.
We expect to lose the bet - but if we won, we'd expect to win big.
Overall, if we could reverse back time and keep taking this bet we'd make no money.
13/n
If we short the stock at $10 (w no costs) then...
90% of the time we'd win $10
10% of the time we'd lose $90.
We expect to win the bet - but if we lose, we'd expect to lose big.
Overall, if we could reverse back time and keep taking this bet we'd make no money.
13/n
Now - what if the stock were trading at $8?
Then, if we could long at $8
90% of the time we'd lose $8
10% of the time we'd win $92
We expect to make $2 per share on the bet.
Cos we can buy below fair value.
14/n
For completeness, what if we shorted at $8...
90% of the time we expect to win $8
10% of the time we expect to lose $92
We expect to lose $2 per share on the bet.
Cos we had to sell below fair value.
15/n
It is not enough to forecast the most likely outcome
You need to identify:
- the most possible outcomes
- their probability of occurring
- your likely payoff if they occur
And, if you can do that, you can price anything.
(We'll look at pricing options like this soon.)
16/n
In practice, this is hard. You don't know the probabilities or the payoffs.
You need models for that.
And you find that each of the numbers is massively sensitive to your input assumptions.
And it's hard to find enough similar bets to know if you have an edge.
17/n
So those of us with the freedom to trade any way we like, tend not to try to predict in this way.
Instead of predicting future outcomes and payoffs, we're more likely to ask:
"What should this thing be trading at given where similar things are trading right now?"
18/n
And we're likely to try to assess fair value over timescales and in environments where we can get a lot of quick feedback on whether our fair value is correct.
Random disorganized thoughts on "rebalancing" πππ
Why do we rebalance?
Cos market movements change asset prices, which causes our actual exposures to deviate from the ones we want.
Also, our views on asset returns and (co)risk might change and need to be updated.
1/n
The trading problem (ignoring txn cost) is to:
- forecast expected returns (alpha) over some forward horizon
- model risk (including the relationship between assets)
- find a set of asset weights we think maximizes our objective (risk-adjusted returns) subject to some stuff
2/n
Rebalancing is really just shunting weights back in line when the market moves them away from where we want them.
In practice, rebalancing can look a bit more complicated because your alphas and risk estimates are changing too.
In the original thread we noted:
- you can't trade VIX
- so there's no market mechanism to stop it from being predictable
- but VIX futures do trade and their price incorporates where the market thinks VIX is likely to go
2/n
If the market thinks VIX is going to go up, the futures will likely already be trading at a premium.
Sellers won't sell low if it's likely to go up.
Buyers will be happy to buy higher if it's likely to go up.
If you're an experienced trader, you'll recognize immediately that this is not a thing you can trade.
Why?
Cos it wouldn't look like that if people could trade it.
2/n
Cos, just by eyeballing the time series chart, you can tell VIX is very predictable:
- It stays about the same in the short term
- But if it's low it's more likely to go up
- And if it's high it's more likely to go down
- It has a floor under which it's unlikely to go lower