[All this was verily water, existing as the essence of water – the solidified cosmic egg. With that, prajApati (bhagavAn) exerted effort of thought on creation.]+
[He considered, “There exists that (lotus leaf) in which this (Earth) is (staying)]
Engal Azhwan explains in Vishnu purANa commentary that the cosnic egg of the form of the lotus leaf - पुष्करपर्णं - was flooded+
स वराहो रूपं कृत्वा उप न्यमज्जत् /
[He assumed the form of a boar and plunged (into the waters).]+
Engal Azhwan explains this as follows- पुश्कर पर्ण लिन्ग दर्शनात् ज्न्ऽआत्वा, नारायण मूर्ते… यथा पुरा अकरोत् तथा वराह रूपं – Seeing that lotus leaf, nArAyaNa decided, "I have to take avatAra, as I did previously as matysa etc."+
स प्र्̥थिवीम् अध आर्छत् /तस्या उपहत्य उदमज्जत् /तत् पुष्करपर्णे ऽप्रथयत्
[He found bhU devI below. Moving near to her, he bore her (on his tusks) to the surface. He extended, ie, made that Earth variegated, in the cosmic egg of the form of a lotus leaf (on the causal waters).]+
उपहत्य - the root is gati. It means he approached near her. bhU devI was feeling dirty due to the waters of the panchabhUtAs and hiraNyAkSha's association.
To put her at ease, bhagavAn came to her as a boar, which is an animal that is unclean by nature and loves filth+
[As he extended her, ie, made her variegated, that is the quality of “being variegated” of prithvI. This (Earth) came to be support of all. That is bhUmi's quality of “being the support"]+
The Earth which was undifferentiated like a mud ball, was made to bear rivers, trees, etc. by his sankalpa.
These are explained in the vishNu purANa shlokAs - समुद्धर भवायेश शं नो देह्य्+
[bhagavAn who bears of fragrances like the wind (वात), carried her to all directions (ie, made her manifest in all directions). He made her firm, not causing her to shake or break further, with mountains made of gravel.]+
वातः is bhagavAn. As the wind bears fragrances, so does he. It means he purified her from her state of shyness and lack of cleanliness, and displayed her in full glory. शर्कराभिर् refers to mountains made of rocks, which arose on Earth by his sankalpa+
The various tattvAs like "waters", "lotus leaf" and so on are Yogic perceptions of the panchabhUtAs, Universe etc and shouldn't be misconstrued as clashing with scientific descriptions. This is the description of varAha in shruti.//
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Descending on the peak of the R^ishabha mountain, the two – galava and garuDa, saw the brAhmaNa woman shANDiIi living there, endowed with knowledge of Brahman. They respectfully honored her.]
shANDili was a great bhAgavatA residing there and she gave them shelter+
When bhagavAn performs a penance towards mahAdeva for gaining a son, he adopts this form:
जटी चीरी जगन्नाथो मानुषं वपुरास्थितः
[The master of the Universe, was in a form like a human, wearing matted hair & a strip of cloth]+
विस्म्यस्थितलोलाक्षाः सर्वदेवगणास्तथा । आश्चर्यं खलु पश्यद्वं न भूतं न भविष्यति
[The gods were rolling their eyes in wonder, “Look at this wonder, there has never been anything like this in the past nor will there be in the future”.]+
This form astonished the gods for two reasons -
1) They had never before seen bhagavAn bowing to another, and were struck with wonder by his soushIlya
2) He was wearing a single strip of cloth. His backside was visible. bhagavAn's backside is more beautiful than his front!+
Everybody knows mantharA was the one who poisoned kaikeyi's mind and made her send rAma to exile. But what was mantharA's motivation and why did she have such enmity to rAma?
This is explained by azhwars as a parama-rahasya and is only hinted in smR^iti. Will produce both here+
First, the words of thirumazhisai azhwar.
kUnagaM pugazh therindha . koRRa villi allaiyE
[Are you not the master of the victorious bow, which straightened the hump of mantharA and thus by this playful act, was the cause of protection of the worlds.]+
Thirumazhisai azhwar explains the reason for mantharA's animosity. When rAma was a child, he used to have a toy bow & shot mudballs with it.
Whenever he saw mantharA's hump, he shot mud balls at her hump. Her hump got straightened by the shots, then wobbled back into place+
This reminds me of an incident Embar identified. Once a Sri Vaishnava Arayar was enacting Krishna leela according to Periyazhwar's pAsuram, "appUcchi kAtuginran" - As a child, Krishna scared the little kids out of mischief
All Acharyas incl. Acharya Ramanuja were listening+
"appUcchi" means when the kids played, one kid (bhagavAn) scared other kids by a sudden act.
The Arayar interpreted the act of bhagavAn as flipping the eyelids to reveal the red color, which would scare the other kids+
Embar however, who was sitting in the crowd, felt that such scare tactics would only be employed by mortals. He signalled to the Arayar to change his gesture.
He felt, Krishna scared the little kids by showing shankha and chakra as well as his additional hands+
[You with boundless valor to support all entities! What is this astonishing meditation of yours? O Support of the Universe! Is there any auspicious object of the three worlds (other than you)?]+
Here is an interesting little shloka from the Mausala Parva.
While describing how the pANDavAs felt when they heard news that bhagavAn had departed for his abode, vyAsa uses the following wording:
nidhanaM vAsudevasya samudrasyeva shoShaNam vIrA na shraddadhus tasya vinAshaM shAr~NgadhanvanaH
[The loss of vAsudeva was like the drying up of the very ocean. Those valorous ones could not believe that (news), which was the loss of the bearer of the shAr~Nga.]+
Superficially, it seems to imply that the pANDavAs could not believe the death of bhagavAn, who is immortal, had occurred.
But this is a mistranslation. For the pANDavAs were j~nAnIs and well knew about bhagavAn’s true nature.+