The Home Secretary has announced even greater police powers than those already in the PCSC Bill: an amendment so protesters who block the highway could face unlimited fines and up to six months in jail
It's also reported police will also receive powers to stop and search activists for “lock-on” equipment. This was something we warned about last year and was recommended by HMIC in a thematic review of protest policing back in March
From our website, November 2020: "the government intends to introduce new grounds for using stop and search powers in order to “prevent significant disruption”, which could include searches for items that protesters could potentially use for direct action or civil disobedience"
Why were thousands marching today to #KillTheBill? One reason is the government's new policing bill "creates is a situation where far more protests, far more often, are likely to face the prospect of having conditions imposed on them" netpol.org/2021/04/13/exp…
"We know from experience that the police are already quick to impose restrictions and conditions on protests, which is why any organisation that is likely to make its voice heard noisily should feel alarmed by the bill’s public order proposals"
"Furthermore, any trade union picket line or protest calling for an ethical boycott of a business that successfully persuades people from entering a company’s premises may find its owners starting to ask the police to shut down pickets or protests"
@SistersUncut 2/ House said the tweet was a “typical preparatory tweet before a demonstration, but not before a vigil”.
There is so much wrong with this arguement it is staggering. *Takes a deep breath.*
@SistersUncut 3/ Those preparing for the vigil were right to share information about what to do when faced with police repression. The Met had clearly indicated that they were going to crack down on the vigil.
Threats to set social services onto women protesters with children, or report disabled protesters to the Department for Work & Pensions, were reported to us many times by the anti-fracking movement. These were all attempts to disrupt their campaigns
Salford Social Service employee at the Barton Moss anti-fracking camp in 2013
As the government seeks to push through new draconian public order laws, thousands of people are demanding a fundamental change. So what does our Charter for Freedom of Assembly Rights actually say? netpol.org/2021/03/15/tho…#FreedomToProtest
1. Public assemblies need not only facilitation, but also protection
2. Public assemblies need protection based on equality and non-discrimination
As over 100,000 people sign our petition opposing The Police, Crime and Sentencing Bill, convincing a Tory government with an 80-seat majority is tough. That’s why Netpol is also making equally tough demands on @PoliceChiefs who lobbied for new legislation netpol.org/2021/03/15/tho…
We need to #KillTheBill but we need more. We've two simple demands on the police. Either set out what "respecting international human rights standards" for policing protests means in practice or say why you won't. Enough guessing what restrictions you'll impose on our rights next
Netpol spent many years attempting, with the support in particular of @TheGreenParty MEP Keith Taylor, to put pressure on senior officers to complete a review into the way the policing of anti-fracking protests was conducted theguardian.com/environment/20…#FreedomToProtest
Today we are helping students from @OfficialUoM publicise their "Report on Police Harassment on Manchester University Campus 2020-2021" and their call for #copsoffcampus. Read their guest post and download the report netpol.org/2021/03/12/cop…
This report is written by a group of students in #CopsOffCampus, all of whom have witnessed first-hand the treatment of students by the authorities on campus.