#LongThread Post Suryavansh Gajapati Odisha till 1568
In this thread we will discuss about some interesting information on Odisha post Prataprudra Deva's death around 1540 till final fall of the kingdom in 1568. This is comparatively small period but full of interesting tales 1/n
We will refer available primary sources like inscriptions, literary sources, western traveller's writings, Mughal sources along with local folklores. We will also discuss about opinions of some of the famous historians. We will try to clarify some of the myths. 2/n
After the death of Gajapati Prataprudra Deva, his two sons were killed by Gobinda Bidyadhara. After that he himself became the king and started the first Bhoi Gajapati dynasty of Odisha. He didn't rule for a long period however, we have inscriptions where he is said to have 3/n
Fought with Golconda in South near Godavari. He is said to have tried to recover the Krishna- Godavari basin lost to Golconda but failed to do so when Raghubhanja Chhotray rose to rebellion. Gobinda has inscriptions in Puri in October 30 1543 along with that he has 4/n
6 inscriptions in Simachalam temple at Vizag. In the Puri plate he is said to have threatened some Garjat chiefs who probably tried to take advantage of chaos created after death of Prataprudra. However, his Simachalam inscription prove beyond doubt that, he was in posession 5/n
Of area atleast till Vizag. Infact in the Madala Panji it is mentioned that he attacked Golconda in the 7th year of of his reign.He was probably trying to recover Krishna Godavari Doab which was lost in last days of Prataprudra. 6/n
After this his son Chakrapratap became the Gajapati. As per Madala Panji, he was an unpopular ruler and tyrannical in nature and was killed by his son Narasimha Jena ( Akbarnama). Probably during this time some petty chiefs became semi independent/independent. 7/n
Now, Narasimha Jena became the king. However, Mukundadeva became powerful general at this time and had considerable influence on him. Mukunda succeeded in dismissing Danayi Bidyadhara (father of Ramachandra Deva of second Bhoi dynasty) from power. 8/n
And finally killed the king and made Raghurama Chhotarai the king. This time Raghubhanja Chhotray, who had earlier attacked Cuttack during Gobinda Bidyadhara's period again attacked taking help of Ghiyasuddin Jalal Saha of Bengal. Mukunda successfully defended Barabati fort 9/n
After this he killed Raghuram Chhotray and became the King at around 1559-60.
Mukunda was a powerful king. Even though he had usurped the throne by murder, but still he was successful to consolidate power. His reign of 8-9 years had many ups and downs. 10/n
He was originally from Telingana and was from a vassal family under Gajapatis of Cuttack. As per P.Mukherjee he probably took service under Gobinda Bidyadhara earlier. He defeated the king of Bengal & conquered till Tribeni in Hooghly district. He z said 2 hv done Tulapurusa 11/n
Ceremony and built a ghat. Even today that Ghat is known as Mukunda Ghat and I've been to that place. This is mentioned by RD Banerjee, Blochmann and even Jadunath Sarkar. The Madala Panji also accurately mentions the same 12/n
As per Bhimeswara temple inscription in Drakshramam in Godavari district there is an inscription of Mukunda in the year 1568. It proves that Mukunda was ruling a land from Triveni to somewhere in Godavari district. Other than this Mukunda has several other inscriptions 13/n
All of the inscriptions are in South Odisha and Andhra. Which clearly proves his rule in these areas. During this period many foreigners visited Odisha. Among them was a merchant named Caesare Fredrick, who praises Mukundadeva. As per him Odisha was a fair kingdom and trusty14/n
A man can go there with gold in hand without any danger so long as the lawful king reigned. Others like Tieffenthler and Badaoni praises Mukunda deva for his politeness to strangers and his military skills. 15/n
Akbar was aware of the strength of Mukundadeva and how he defeated the Bengal Sultan. Therefore, he sent 2 ambassadors to court of Mukunda to support him against Suleiman Karrani who had supported his rebellious Uzbek general named Khan Zaman. In response Mukunda had sent 16/n
Envoys to Akbar's court. This is a popular misconception among many that Mukunda sent embassy and for alliance first. Mukunda had no reason to do so. He had already defeated powerful Bengal sultan and was ruling a vast land from Ganga to Godavari. He had no reason to ask for 17/n
Help. The land ruled by Mukunda can easily be verified from the later Mughal records based on Abul Fazal and General Mansingh's records. This was based on Todarmal's land settlement. Where the then Odisha was divided into 5 Sarkars. Jaleswar, Bhadrak, Cuttack, Kalinga and 18/n
Rajamuhendry. What Mughals considered as Odisha was basically Mukundadeva's territory. But, Mughals themselves didn't have any control beyond Chilika lake. So, at one point Mukundadeva's ruling territory was as big as powerful Ganga rulers.(Ain-i-Akbari, SS attached) 19/n
Abul Fazal also talks about a 9 storey building that Mukundadeva had built in Barabati fort of Cuttack. This was probably one of the largest in India of that time. A large kingdom with sea trade certainly enabled him to build something like this. 20/n
Even though Mukunda had some good military achievements in his name, he was an usurper and other contenders of the throne were not happy with him. There are several theories regarding his end. It is said that the Suleiman Karrani sent his army to attack Odisha. Mukunda 21/n
Sent Raghubhanja Chhotray (who he had jailed earlier) to fight him along with Ramachandra Bhanja. But, both betrayed and joined hands with Karrani. Mukunda had no option left. He proceeded to fight but was defeated and killed in Gobirutika in Jajpur. 22/n
There are other theories also, where it is said Mukunda was in Hooghly area at time of attack & a simultaneous attack happened by Kalapahar on Cuttack via sea route. This time Raghubhanja Chhotray declared himself the king in Sarangarh. Mukunda had to return back & was killed23/n
By Raghubhanja, and Raghubhanja was again killed by Kalapahar. This was a sad end of the glorious Gajapatis of Cuttack.
There is an interesting part which I want to add. There are several characters named Mukunda Bahubalendra in history of of Odisha. As per RD Mukherjee it24/n
Was kind of a title. One of Mukundadeva's relative was named as Mukunda who had defied authority of Golconda and had to face the heat of Golconda army. Therefore, some people are confused and mix up historical incidents. 25/n
Reference:
1. History of Odisha , RD Banerjee
2. The Saga of land of Jagannath by Mayadhara Mansingh
3. The history of Gajapati kings of Odisha, by Prabhat Mukherjee
4. Khurdha Itihasa, by Kedarnath Mohapatra
5. Ain-i-Akbari by Abul Fazl
6. Madala Panji
26/n
7. History of Bengal, vol II by Jadunath Sarkar

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kalinga Arya

Kalinga Arya Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KalingaArya

10 Sep
#Thread
ଗଜପତି କପଳେନ୍ଦ୍ର ଦେବଙ୍କ ସାମ୍ରାଜ୍ୟ ର ଆକାର ସମ୍ପର୍କିତ କିଛି ଭୁଲ୍ ଧାରଣା ଉଭୟ ଓଡ଼ିଆ ଏବଂ ଅଣଓଡିଆ ମାନଙ୍କ ଭିତରେ ରହିଅଛି। ମୁଁ କିଛି ମାନଚିତ୍ର ଏହା ଉପରେ ଦେଖିଲି ଯେଉଗୁଡ଼ିକରେ ତ୍ରୁଟି ରହିଛି କିମ୍ବା ପୁରୁଣା ତଥ୍ୟ ଉପରେ ଆଧାରିତ। ଚେଷ୍ଟା କରିଥିଲି ସେଥିରେ ପରିବର୍ତ୍ତନ ଆଣିବାକୁ କିନ୍ତୁ ଟୁଇଟର ରେ reply ଦେଇକି 1/n
ତାହା ସମ୍ଭବ ନୁହଁ, କାରଣ ଆମ ପାଖେ ଶବ୍ଦ ଲିମିଟ ଅଛି ଏବଂ ସେଥିରେ ବୁଝାଇବା କଷ୍ଟକର। ସେଥିଲାଗି ବୃଥା ଚେଷ୍ଟା ନ କରି ଏହି ସୂତଟି ଲେଖୁଛି। ପାଠକ ମାନଙ୍କୁ ଅନୁରୋଧ ନିଜର ମତାମତ ରଖିବେ।
ପ୍ରଥମେ କେତୋଟି assumption ଏବଂ disclaimer ମୁଁ କହି ରଖେ।
Disclaimer: ଭାରତୀୟ ଇତିହାସ ବିଷୟରେ ଆମ ପାଖରେ ବହୁତ୍ କମ 2/n
ତଥ୍ୟ ହିନ୍ଦୁ ସୋର୍ସ ରେ ରହିଛି। ତେଣୁ 500 ବର୍ଷ ତଳର କୌଣସି ସାମ୍ରାଜ୍ୟ ର ଆକାର ନିର୍ଣ୍ଣୟ କରିବା ଅତ୍ୟନ୍ତ କଷ୍ଟକର। ତାହାପୁଣି ଯେତେବେଳେ ସାମ୍ରାଜ୍ୟ ର ସୀମା ବହୁବାର ପରିବର୍ତ୍ତନ ହେଉଥିବାର ଉଦାହରଣ ଅଛି। ତେଣୁ Ancient,classical even early mediaeval ସମୟ ର ସମସ୍ତ ସାମ୍ରାଜ୍ୟ ର ଆକାର ଏକ intelligent guess work 3/n
Read 29 tweets
3 Apr
Much more effort is needed. GOI must invest a lot of money for upliftment of our tribal brothers. I've stayed in tribal areas of Odisha for years. The issue with tribals in context of Odisha are as follows.
1. The areas they stay are usually forest or mountainous with less 1/n
density of population. As a result it requires additional monetary resources for building infrastructure like roads, hospitals and education institutions.
2. These people have very less representation in politics. What little representations they have are of very little use 2/n
As other powerful leaders use them as show piece with any real power.
3. Economically govt feels it won't benefit much by building roads in a forest and mountainous areas.
So all the three factors combined result in poor social and economic development of the tribals. 3/n
Read 8 tweets
3 Apr
#Thread
What is special in Odisha's history which is unique/rarely found elsewhere in India.
1. A deity being officially considered as d King of d kingdom n d ruler as his deputy(Rauta) for hundreds of years from around 1200 AD till monarchy ended in Odisha. What surprising 1/n
Is that it was not something which was done for some ceremonial purpose. The people of Odisha used to consider the same in those time period mentioned.
2. There were upto 6 female rulers of Bhaumakara dynasty who ruled Odisha for years. This kind of example is rare in India 2/n
3.Odisha under E. Ganga n Suryavanshi Gajapatis withstood Islamic invasion frm 1200 to 1568, even though north, south & west of it were occupied by Turaskas very early. As per RCM E. Ganga was the only Major dynasty wch withstood Islamic invasion when all of India perished 3/n
Read 11 tweets
6 Mar
Thread on maritime history of Kalinga.
People know about Chola naval supremacy in 10-11 th century. But before that Kalinga were flag bearer of hindu maritime supremacy (both military and trade) in south East Asian region and beyond. Here are some of the interesting points.
Probably first ever mainland Indians who tried to cross the sea in eastern coast were the Kalingans. They figured out the flow of wind from north to south east direction in the month of November and used their ships to travel from Odisha coast to Indonesian islands of Java 2/n
Sumatra and Bali along with countries like present day Singapore ,Malaysia, Vietnam Philippines, Sri Lanka and even China.Their influence on SEA is huge and can be felt even today as well. J Crawfurd mentions that Hindu influence in Java was entirely from Kalinga. 3/n
Read 14 tweets
23 Dec 20
Long Thread:
Debunking the myth of Rajputs saving Hinduism(from islamic iconoclasts) in Odisha.
In last few days there are some people who are trying to selectively quote few things and create an impression that Rajputs saved Odisha from iconoclastic muslims 1/n
To discuss this specific issue I will analyse various available information from beginning of islamic rule in India till d period of start of Maratha rule in Odisha(from 1193 to 1751). In dis I will cover the question of Rajputs safeguarding hindu cause in Odisha as well. 2/n
Muslims started ruling in India after the fall of Prithviraj Chauhan. It is to the credit of Rajputs and other Indian kingdoms who stopped the islamic armies for centuries. But, finally they lost and by around 1200 they reached near the border of Odisha. 3/n
Read 25 tweets
20 Dec 20
Ok, finally I got the response. I decided to write it in a separate thread.I want to have all response in one place. I will put SS of his response and respond to that one by one. 1/n
Pic1: It is irrelevant who talked about the book first. The point was he raised the question of Maru being Rajput. If he knew about that book he should have checked it immediately before asking. She responded by sharing the SS. So, the question asked was well answered. 2/n Image
Pic2,3,4: We have 2 primary sources. Both agree on the theme. Only point was Mirza Nathan do claim few things which are exaggeration. Tallying that with MP mentioned time of Rathayatra it is clear that d Raths were ceremonial Raths. Which r still used today pulled by thousands3/n ImageImageImage
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(