Glass: the most underrated medieval technology? (thread) 1/
Europeans had been making glass since the Late Bronze Age (and Egyptians even earlier), but despite considerable advances in the Hellenistic and Roman periods, the product was rough and opaque. 2/
During the 13th century, however, Venetian glassmakers on the island of Murano—where they had been confined by the city's government to prevent the spread of fires and trade secrets—discovered new techniques for making a durable and transparent product. 3/
Murano glass was the product of economic and geographical circumstance. It was composed of the local pure-silica quartz, which could be ground into a fine, clear sand and combined with Levantine soda ash (upon which the Venetians held a monopoly) before being melted. 4/
The Murano glassmakers ruled the industry for three centuries, shipping everything from windowpanes to dinnerware across Europe, and by 1581 there were 28 furnaces on the island. Philip II of Spain and Pope Clement VII were among dozens of royal and ecclesiastical collectors. 5/
Venice sought desperately to keep its monopoly. If a glassmaker left without permission, he would be asked to return. If he refused, his family would be imprisoned, and if he still persisted, an assassin would be hired to kill him off. 6/
But European states were determined to set up luxury glass industries and lured away Venetian glassmakers to train their own artisans. The Venetian style spread across the continent. 7/
Venice's loss was Europe's gain. In 1260, Roger Bacon developed the first pair of spectacles, which became increasingly effective with the new glass. Glass windows spread rapidly, first in palaces and churches, but thenceforth to businesses and homes. 8/
The economic and social impact was vast. Spectacles increased the working lives of scholars and helped to spread literacy. Windows increased the duration and efficiency of indoor work. Greenhouses allowed the spread of fruits and vegetables (and thus healthier diets). 9/
The microscope (1590), thermometer (1593), telescope (1608), and barometer (1644) transformed and expanded the sciences, and the Scientific Revolution took off during the seventeenth century alongside the diffusion of Venetian glass. 10/
Most intriguing of all, perhaps, was the impact of the mirror. The ability to see one's own face and body led to the development of a self-consciousness absent in medieval times, and thus to demand for better clothing and cosmetics. 11/
Mirror-gazing cultivated an obsession with individuality, and to new interests in biography, portraiture, and the novel. In the reflection of Venetian glass, Europeans discovered the self—and transformed the continent's economy, thought, and aesthetic sense forever. 12/
If you enjoyed this thread, I write a newsletter about economic and technological history that you can subscribe to here! daviskedrosky.substack.com/subscribe
Might be one for @tylercowen, too.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Davis Kedrosky

Davis Kedrosky Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dkedrosky

21 Sep
Someone recently asked for a list of the books that I've been listening to while running. So, without further ado:

RUNNING AUDIOBOOK POWER RANKINGS (in descending order):
10. Anthony, David W. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World

The rating is unfair, because it's better than several ahead. My lack of domain expertise meant I enjoyed parts (esp. first 1/3) more than the whole.
9. Abulafia, David. The Great Sea: A Human History of the Mediterranean

A truly sweeping, panoramic regional history, reaching for Braudel-ian scope and sometimes succeeding. A fantastic introductory book in political history terms, if a bit light on social and economic aspects.
Read 11 tweets
17 Sep
Did energy constraints really stop the Dutch from industrializing? A thread: 1/
In 1650, the most developed country in Europe was the Dutch Republic, not England. High living standards were accompanied and supported by unprecedented urbanization and agricultural productivity. 2/
Some associate the 17th c. "Dutch Golden Age" with the carrying trade, but while commerce provided some capital, the Netherlands really grew because of industry—it exported a wide range of manufactured goods, from finished textiles and sawn timber to beer and refined sugar. 3/
Read 22 tweets
31 Aug
Did Britain sacrifice the Industrial Revolution to defeat Napoleon? A thread: 1/ Image
We've long known that growth during the classic IR of 1760-1820 was slow, and that major increases in real GDP per capita did not really occur until the early nineteenth century. 2/ Image
What we're less sure about is why. One popular rationale—to which I largely subscribe—stressed inherent factors, such as the lag-times in technological adoption, development, and diffusion, or the inevitably slow rate at which the "modern" sector outgrows lagging sectors. 3/ Image
Read 19 tweets
27 Aug
A summary thread and musings on Allen and Wrigley's theory of early pre-industrial urbanization in Britain. 1/ #econhist #EconTwitter #twitterstorians Image
Most pre-industrial societies were caught in a devastating low-level equilibrium trap: they had small cities (in absolute and relative terms) and unproductive agriculture (low crop yields and labor efficiency). 2/
To expand the cities and get more labor into industry, farms needed to become more productive—e.g. investment, land use optimization, crop experimentation, etc. for raising yields. 3/
Read 26 tweets
26 Aug
Considering that this poll was taken in a Berkeley history course, I'm mildly shocked! Image
Oh, you get to see my answers, too. That's nice.
Ah, back in business. We have an audience question seeking reassurance that the link between imperialism and capitalism will be discussed.
Read 4 tweets
18 Aug
THREAD+NEWSLETTER: Urban demand, NOT agrarian capitalism, drove city growth in early modern Britain. 1/

If you enjoy this, please share! I rely primarily on word of mouth for spreading the good word. daviskedrosky.substack.com/p/london-calli… #EconTwitter #econhist
A classic view of British industrialization, dating back to Marx, holds that autonomous change in agriculture—enclosures, private property, large farms—increased worker productivity, supplying the growing cities with labor, food, and raw materials 2/
Crafts and Harley (2004), for example, find that French-style peasant farming would have had a significant "deindustrializing" effect by lowering urban employment.

The implication: capitalist farming permits city growth and explains British structural transformation. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(