1. Weekend Reading: Decided to do a series that features my work over the years on USDA crop and livestock reports. If you look at my CV you might be shocked how many papers I have written on this topic. Why? The answer is in my new book, which is almost finished.
2. Taking a trip back in time this week to a 1990 AJAE article I wrote with my very first PhD student, Phil Colling, from my long ago days as a Buckeye. Phil just retired from the CFTC, so you know the paper was published awhile ago!
3. This was my very first paper on USDA reports, and it was a big hit for me early in my career. I was still an assistant professor when it was accepted. I think this is a free link to the pdf onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.230…
4. So why study the Hogs and Pigs Report (HPR)? Two reasons. First, HPRs back in the 70s and 80s consistently caused the largest price moves I have ever seen following ag or non-ag public announcements. Hog futures hit daily price limit for HALF of the 28 HPRs we studied!
5. I could not dig out the exact numbers, but I know that back in those days there were several HPRs when hog futures were locked limit up or down for 3 or 4 days. That seems unimaginable today. Truly crazy price volatility. Think Trading Places with Eddie Murphy.
6. Why was the price reaction to HPRs so violent so frequently? Mainly it had to do with how hard it was to anticipate hog breeding herd numbers back then. The structure of the hog production industry was vastly different and much harder to predict breeding inventory.
7. The second reason we looked at HPRs is that Phil and I got a hold of data on pre-report estimates for HPRs. We were the first in ag econ to publish a paper using data on "market surprises." Sure that this new data was the reason we made it into the AJAE.
8. What did we find? Pretty much what you would expect. Large and significant price reactions to the "unanticipated" information (market surprise = USDA - pre-trade) in HPRs across the board.
9. This paper launched 30+ years of studying and analyzing USDA crop and livestock reports. Yes I admit to being obsessed. According to Google Scholar the paper has been cited 155 times and it still gets cited 5-6 times a year. Pretty good for a paper in its 4th decade.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Irwin

Scott Irwin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ScottIrwinUI

7 Oct
1. I know I repeat myself, but I still think that an @RinnyTheGopher quote is perfect for the RIN market: It is the only market in history where the fundamental is political intrigue. No better proof than what is being reported today.
@RinnyTheGopher 2. @OPISBiofuels reporting this morning ***Ethanol RINs Down 10cts in Morning Volatility; Markets Stable at Midday.
@RinnyTheGopher @OPISBiofuels 3. "Sources attributed the morning instability on the ongoing speculation around when EPA will release its long-delayed proposals for Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO) blending targets."
Read 5 tweets
1 Oct
1. Weekend Reading: As they used to say on Monty Python, "...and now for something completely different. A couple of years ago I wrote a paper with this title, "Writing Papers in Economics Using Fake Latex." The article is real. Here is the link onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
2. The back story for the paper will provide some insights into how faddish and tribal academics can be. Most people outside academics will be surprised how influential the physical appearance of a paper can be to other academics.
3. The "cool kids" in economics and lots of other STEM fields write papers in something called LaTeX. It was originally designed for desktop publishing, and I will be the first to admit that papers produced using this platform have a pleasing aesthetic appearance.
Read 12 tweets
29 Sep
1. Further confirmation that the leaked RVO numbers last week were real. This is quite a statement even considering how ferocious past battles in the #RFSwars have been.
2. Assuming the leaked numbers were right (at least at the time), I am still trying to figure out the political calculus of Biden Admin in going so anti-ag on the RVOs. Whatever your personal views on the RFS, the leaked proposal is indeed the worst ever from perspective of ag
3. Think about that. By all appearances, the Biden Admin is attacking the RFS more aggressively than even the Trump Admin. Who had that on their bingo card? I certainly did not.
Read 6 tweets
28 Sep
1. Given strong evidence now that leaked RVO numbers were legit, we can now consider further how the Biden EPA is going to justify the cuts.
2. I have talked a lot about the "intentionally late gambit" for crushing the RVOs, particularly for the conventional ethanol mandate. Biden EPA could clearly use this for cutting 2020 RVO by arguing compliance is late. Probably do so for 2021. But 2022?
3. Since the leaked RVOs included substantial cuts to the conventional mandate for all three years for 2021-2022, I no longer think this is the justification being used to crush the RVOs for all three years. Instead, they went were even the Trump EPA dared not tread.
Read 7 tweets
28 Sep
1. Article contained a quote about corn prices going under $4 next year. Some clarification will be helpful. I don't think that will happen until summer 2022 at the earliest. Obviously weather dependent as well.
2. My thinking is that there is going to be a major global acreage response to the current high grain prices, even considering the ongoing run up in input costs. Land prices and rents going up is the norm as grain prices go up. Other inputs too.
3. Market analysts, myself included, were surprised by the muted acreage response to the higher grain prices in 2021. Maybe I will be wrong again, but history suggests a strong US acreage response in 2022. Maybe 183 million acres + combined US corn/soy planted acreage.
Read 4 tweets
22 Sep
1. Put together this handy cheat sheet for the leaked RFS RVO numbers in the @OPISBiofuels article this morning. Also included the current "final" RVOs for 2020 and the "timecopped" adjusted RVO for 2020 (h/t to Rinny for always have the pithiest description!)
@OPISBiofuels 2. The only bone thrown out to ag is the increase in the advanced to 6.7 billion gallons in 2022. One way to benchmark these numbers is to compare the total RVO to the 20.09 total RVO currently on the books for 2020: -2.96BG in 2020, -1.462BG in 2021, & +0.675BG in 2022.
@OPISBiofuels 3. Using the current 2020 total RVO as the benchmark, the leaked RVOs for 2020-2020 result in a total RVO cut of 3.747 billion gallons. Would have to go back to check for sure, but think it would make the Biden Admin a bigger chopper of the RFS than even the Trump Admin.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(