Thread by @MurdochCadell

"The biggest source of corruption in Afghanistan", one American official said, "was the United States."

We knew that in 2013

#corruption
#AfghanistanDisaster
#afghanRC
#DefenceRC
#Hurley
#riggedections

https://twitter.com/very_grem/status/1446752162483085315

If you read the 2013 story about Afghanistan, it doesn’t take much imagination to think the CIA may do similar things in other countries.

How did the US come to ‘own’ Australia as the result of a few key figures?

‘AUKUS’ seems to be result of only a few key figures in the intelligence agencies, Defence and the Executive.

How much would it take to bribe them?

Not much, I imagine, particularly if you could promise to do what you could to sway a close election.

Think the CIA doesn’t operate in friendly countries?

Consider this:

If they were prepared to spend billions to control a country that is geo-politically irrelevant, how much would they spend to ‘buy’ a country that would rubber stamp what they most want: a war with China.

A war with China would end the US’s severe debt problems, and help them limit the expansion of Chinese manufacturing taking over the world.

Sure it would cost some lives. Like that ever stopped them.

Imagine if you ran the world like it was a big game of ‘Risk’ and the only thing that mattered was that the US won.

How would you play, and what sort of things would you do?

Do you think you would leave Aust alone because we were a nice little democracy?

The US and UK are ‘unique’ properties for the US to own, because they bring with them the only thing the US can not get by military force alone: the semblance of a ‘quorum’ of world ‘powers’ who support their aggression.
That’s worth more ten submarines.

Don’t like what I say, Prime Minister?

Sue me.

We’ll see in court which of us sold Australia out.

You might be in for a shock.

#kangaroosale
#AUKUS
#australiaforsale
#paidalliance
#freeassange
#FederalICAC