Thread: I note that people talking about the continuing drop in ACT scores seem to focus on a few things: Teaching and students.

Maybe that's fair. But maybe there is something else at work.
ACT has been prepping us for this for a while. This is from July, for instance. Image
Because this. ACT scores have been dropping for several years. Whatever is happening is not caused solely by the pandemic. Image
What a lot of people don't realize is that test questions are tested well before they make it into an official exam. Selecting the right questions, in the right proportion of "hard, medium and easy" is a skill. And it's hard to master.
We have seen that since College Board ostensibly took test construction back from ETS and put it in house, scores have fluctuated pretty dramatically.

Read this, for instance, from the good folks at @CompassEduGroup who kick butt on test analysis compassprep.com/major-drop-in-…
But we don't really question The Agencies, because relying on these tests is so embedded in our collective psyche. If scores are down, it must be problems with the kids taking the tests, right?

Right?
Everyone knows the last 18 months have been tough on kids. I have heard of a few who loved and preferred online learning, but regardless, it's a new modality, and students who have learned in traditional classrooms have had adjustment pains.

You would too.
But how do we know it's the kids? And how can we account for--get ready--the fact that when scores go down, it's actually good for The Agencies?

Lower scores increase demands for testing.
Just ask the people in your state legislature if things like this don't make people demand more accountability of our schools, because the tests say kids aren't learning.

Do you see the pattern here?
I'm not accusing anyone or any agency of purposely creating tests that scale lower. I'm saying when test scores go down, it's good for business, whether it's intentional or accidental or a function of educational realities.
Remember, "College ready" is a concept cut from whole cloth. It's a made-up concept. And it too, is a driver of business.

So as you read the reactions to lower ACT scores, keep that in mind.

We owe it to the kids.
Oh, and #EMTalk

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Boeckenstedt

Jon Boeckenstedt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonBoeckenstedt

15 Oct
Thread: Complexities in admissions.

As you may know, my wife is a writing tutor. At this time of the year, she gets a lot of frantic requests from parents and students who want help with college essays.

Today, she said, "These poor kids."
It's October 15th, which is the first big deadline, mostly, it seems, among some big public universities in the southeast, some of whom, I understand, don't even use all the things they require in the admissions process.
The supplementals are, well, whack. They're simply attempts to torture students, I've come to believe, since the default response is the most basic and boring and innocuous response conceivable. Of course, students have been cautioned not to go in that direction.
Read 12 tweets
13 Oct
Thread: See if you notice a problem with this article on test optional admissions.

wbez.org/stories/test-o…
No, it's not the legitimate questions about whether test-optional is the "solution" to equity issues in America. It's not (and no test-optional proponent I know of has ever said it is). It's a start, however. Image
It's this: (shout out to @AndyBorstUofI BTW) Image
Read 6 tweets
13 Oct
Some lessons learned in the last 48 hours:

1) You never know when a tweet will go viral, so make sure it makes sense to people who are not your followers
2) There are an amazing number of people out there who still think standardized tests help low-income students. That PR job The Agencies has done is one for the ages.
3) There seem to be as many people who like charts because they look nice as there are people who like the story a chart can tell (I chose red to violet because of the color spectrum not for National Coming Out Day. But I'm glad it worked both ways, of course.
Read 7 tweets
11 Oct
Thread: A slow weekend turned interesting when a student at Columbia, in response to a tweet suggesting the SAT and ACT were "good, actually" posted this chart.
It's a chart I've used several times before, and I explain the way I got the data (I even told people at ACT how I got the data from the tool they provide colleges), and I explain how to read it on a long post here. jonboeckenstedt.net/2020/01/10/som…
The responses are typical, of course, and offer nothing new by way of explanation. My favorite is always that the data make sense because "wealthy people are smarter."

Of course.
Read 13 tweets
10 Oct
Thread: A) The government Scorecard is the government's. Colleges didn't move the goal posts. B) Federal reporting requirements include 4,5,and 6-year rates. Image
C) I did this about six years ago. It shows how grad rates are less meaningful than we might want them to be. highereddatastories.com/2015/03/anothe…
D) Grad rates are inputs, not outputs. Tell me the mean SAT score of your freshman class and I'll tell you how many will graduate. highereddatastories.com/2014/02/are-gr…
Read 5 tweets
27 Aug
Thread: I was in an online meeting today with people talking about making the college admissions process better. I was in a room with people who literally have forgotten more about statistics than I'll probably ever know.

So I guess I should have shut up. But I didn't.
In the room were faculty experts on measurement and assessment. People from CBOs and other NFPs who were trying to make a difference in the lives of students. High school counselors. People from testing companies. And a few people who had actually done admissions.
We heard a lot about what things we could collect to make prediction better. We heard about measuring potential, about the problems with grades, about new tests and new measures and better ways to "increase access."

The three of us from admissions waited our turn.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(