For folks who can't make my #rEDSurrey21 presentation on developing expert teaching, here's a short summary:

The most expert teachers help pupils learn 4x faster than the least expert (Wiliam, 2016).

Teaching expertise is a thing worth investing in.
However, getting better at many aspects of teaching is hard to do via experience alone (Kraft & Papay, 2016).

This is why formal teacher development is so important.
However, the quality of teacher development is highly variable. There are a few bright spots, but most programmes have little impact, and some are even detrimental (Fletcher-Wood & Zuccolo, 2020).

There's room for improvement.
For me, improvement begins with establishing clarity around:

→ What expertise is
→ How we can systematically develop it
Expertise is reliably strong performance against the core tasks that a teacher faces (Ericsson et al, 2018).

While the core tasks of teaching are the same for every teacher, the strategies needed to tackle them are unique.
Our ability to tackle the core tasks of any role is a product of the 'mental model' that we possess.

'Mental model' is just a fancy term for 'what teachers know and how that knowledge is organised to guide perception, decision and action'.
We can systematically build teaching expertise around these core tasks by employing a set of essential development processes (or 'mechanisms').

👊

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peps Mccrea

Peps Mccrea Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PepsMccrea

13 Oct
Routines offer serious value for learning.

However, they take time and effort to establish, and often come with an initial dip in performance. During this phase, it can be tempting to give up.

→ This is what @JamesClear calls the 'Valley of Latent Potential'.

🧵... Image
At their best, routines can:

→ Redeploy attention
→ Reduce behaviour management
→ Increase student motivation, confidence and safety
→ Free up of teacher mental capacity to monitor learning and be more responsive

However, these benefits only come once routines become automated.

The amount of time it takes for a routine to automate depends on its complexity and how frequently we run it. Simple routines can take 20 repetitions. More complex ones can take up to 200.

Read 8 tweets
8 Oct
Today, the EEF released a systematic review which challenges the way we think about effective Professional Development (PD).

A thread on my interpretation of what they found and why it's important.

First, a bit of background...

Until recently, PD effectiveness has mostly been thought about in terms of either 'forms' or 'characteristics'.

→ Forms are things like: instructional coaching or lesson study
→ Characteristics are things like: collaborative or sustained
However, a recent analysis by @DrSamSims & @HFletcherWood (2019) proposed a third way.

In addition to thinking about forms and characteristics, they hypothesised that thinking about PD in terms of 'mechanisms' might add even more power and nuance to our perspective.
Read 21 tweets
3 Oct
A short thread on one of the most critical concepts in planning for learning:

→ Backwards design
As teachers, nailing our approach to planning is paramount.

It not only makes a huge difference to pupil learning, but also to workload. Berliner suggests that expert teachers plan lessons 50x quicker than novice teachers 🚀
However, effective approaches to planning are not always obvious.

For example, some teachers in their early years (including myself) have found themselves beginning planning by trying to identify a good activity.
Read 7 tweets
26 Sep
A short thread on *trust* in the classroom: why we need it and how teachers can build it.

For pupils, the value of what they learn is nebulous and highly delayed.

As teachers, we continually require pupils to have faith that the objects we ask them to attend to and the decisions we make on their behalf will pay off for them further down the line.
When trust is present, pupils will readily embrace teacher suggestions about where to allocate their attention and effort.

When trust is absent, pupils can view teacher direction as an inconvenience, or even with suspicion, and ultimately reject it altogether.
Read 8 tweets
4 Sep
🧵THREAD...

For those who can't make it to my #rED21 session tomorrow, here's the ultraconcise version:
1. Teaching expertise matters.
2. But developing expertise is not something we've cracked, yet.
Read 9 tweets
29 Aug
🧵Short thread of threads on building routines in the classroom:
1. Routines are powerful tools for learning because they shift the locus of what our pupils think about most.

2. However, the economics of routines make us prone to chucking in the towel before they are fully established.

Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(