In 1971, along with Sandy Lieberson, David Puttnam had the audacity to bid for the rights to the book ‘Inside the Third Reich’ by Albert Speer.

Rank outsiders in pursuit of the rights, the publisher agreed that we might at least travel to Heidelberg to make their case in person.
"Albert Speer, Hitler’s former Architect & Armaments Minister had walked out of Spandau prison five years earlier, having served twenty years for war crimes – he patiently listened for several hours as we took him through our reasons for wanting to make the film".
"To our amazement, he agreed that if a movie was to be made, it should be produced by & for a younger generation. That was the start of an adventure which took us and our screenwriter Andrew Birkin on numerous occasions back & forth to Heidelberg."
During those conversations Puttnam came understand ‘the #fascist play book’ - "the way democracy can be corrupted & overturned by a few malevolent but persuasive politicians who are prepared to exploit divisions in society with simple populist messages."

davidputtnam.com/viewNews/n/lor…
Speers "explained the extent to which we were all vulnerable, & the importance of developing the form of ‘moral vigilance’ required to recognise nascent evil for what it is."

Speers joined the National Socialist Party in 1931 with a view to furthering his career as an Architect.
What should have been his "moment of truth" came seven years later.

Puttnam: "Driving to his office on November 1938 he passed the smouldering ruins of Berlin’s synagogues, the result of the orchestrated riots of the previous night – ‘Kristallnacht’."
Speers wrote: “most of all I was offended by the smashed panes of shop windows which offended my sense of middle-class order. What I didn’t see was that more was being smashed than glass, that on that night Hitler had taken a step that irrevocably sealed the fate of his country.”
Puttnam: "A more politically astute man would have realised that Rubicon had been crossed five years earlier, in the aftermath of the Reichstag Fire & the subsequent Enabling Decree, which effectively disbanded Parliament & handed absolute power to Hitler."
Puttnam: "The full title of the Act was ‘The Decree for the Protection of the People & the State’. It’s an interesting word ‘enabling’, it sounds fairly harmless – as in ‘enabling’ a child or an elderly person to safely cross a road."
Puttnam: "How often do powers accrue to Parliament through a piece of legislation whose intent is the precise opposite of its title?"
"Take for example the present Govt’s plans to revise the Data Protection regime, their consultation allows for the impression that they’re simply ‘freeing us up from bureaucracy’, when by far the most likely outcome is the privatisation, exploitation & sale of our personal data."
"It might be a good idea to take a long hard look at what else is coming down the track: an ‘Elections Bill’ that, contrary to the advice of the Committee for Standards in Public Life, is set on undermining our long established independent ‘Electoral Commission’;"
"a Bill to reform Judicial Review whose principal aim is to reduce the role of the Judiciary; a Police Bill that weakens the right to legal protest; a plan to ‘widen the scope of the Official Secrets Act’ with no commitment to add a public interest defence for journalists."
"even an Education Bill that seeks to reduce traditional academic freedoms in the area of Teacher Training! All of this accompanied by continued mutterings about ‘unelected judges’ in Strasbourg, & ‘reforming’ the UK’s implementation of the European Human Rights Act..."
"each of them setting out to chip away at & undermine much of what defines an active liberal democracy: institutions that might act as checks & balances on a populist Govt trampling on long held rights & conventions, with the sole purpose of tightening its own grip on power."
"A free & fearless media is essential to democracy. When the PM actively & repeatedly intervenes to manipulate an ideological ally into the Chair of Ofcom, every alarm bell should start to ring signalling the absolute nonsense that’s being made of the regulator’s independence."
For me, the historical parallels between strategies adopted by our present Government, & what Puttnam & many others call "the fascist playbook", are uncanny, undeniable & deeply disturbing.

Imho, the "culture war" IS the fascist playbook by another name.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

18 Oct
Conservatism? Liberalism? Neoliberalism?

It's been argued that neoliberalism originated as much in opposition to fascism as to socialism – a point that Foucault addresses in detail in his analysis of ordoliberalism in his lectures on biopolitics...

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
'Opposition to fascism did not lead to a uniform view of the role of the state, liberty or sovereignty, & from its inception in the 1920s, neoliberalism has a complex & uneasy relationship with other movements on the political right, in particular conservatism & libertarianism.'
At the Walter Lippmann Colloquium in 1938 – the starting point of European neoliberalism for Foucault – differences were aired that became more significant over time. The majority of those present sided with Hayek in calling for the reinvention of liberalism.
Read 37 tweets
18 Oct
Dominic Raab looking moody.
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
James Weinberg researches the psychological pressures of political life & the problem of violence & intimidation of politicians.

Dog-whistle & aggressive populism, partisan & personalising political news & improved democratic education all play a role.

theconversation.com/david-amess-ki…
Even before the challenging #COVID19 pandemic, a recent Hansard Society audit of political engagement concluded that “opinions of the systems of governing are at their lowest point in the 15-year Audit series – worse now than in the aftermath of the MPs’ expenses scandal”.
In the #GE2017, 56% of surveyed parliamentary candidates expressed concern about abuse & intimidation. Misuse of anonymous social media accounts has intensified these problems & created a toxic environment for MPs that regularly exposes them to online rape & murder threats.
Read 11 tweets
17 Oct
A #THREAD on polarisation.

Imho, we've arrived at a curious historical juncture, wherein the strategy adopted by either 'side' of *any* issue now follows a familiar format, regardless of what the issue is (I'm NOT claiming "both sides" of a debate have equally valid arguments):
1) delegitimise opposing organisations/beliefs/groups by claiming they're funded by anti-democratic individuals/organisations with a sinister ulterior/ideological motive

2) flood social/print/online media with divisive rhetoric demonising & negatively stereotyping the other side
3) claim supporters of a particular view have been brainwashed/radicalised by sinister anti-democratic forces

4) claim THE TRUTH is being deliberately suppressed

5) claim sections of the media are pushing a grotesquely distorted view

6) exclude non-partisan voices from debate
Read 15 tweets
17 Oct
Obviously it's exclusively the hateful Lefties who are too loose with their 'dangerous rhetoric'.
And of course the hateful Leftist "scum media" played its role in amplifying dangerously irresponsible rhetoric too.
And as for those awful Lefty MPs saying all sorts of terrible things...
Read 10 tweets
17 Oct
Ages ago I replied to a tweet with some duff info about the Mont Pelerin Society, which I quickly deleted.

This person from the weirdo CATO institute dug up a screenshot of the deleted tweet & tweeted it out - I assume because I'm very critical of the Koch-funded CATO Institute.
This is the deleted tweet he's obsessed with - which was, as I say, duff information - & he's now smearing me by making spurious claims about the tweet.

It was seen by just TWO people before it was deleted (not sure what the foreign language is at the bottom).
This is the thread that seems to have so rattled him (or perhaps his bosses at the CATO Institute).

The exchange that upset him is at the end.

Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(