[thread]
I would like to apologise to @DPJHodges
I am sorry
I said to you in response to your tweet below:
"And please try and engage brain before your craven client sycophancy"
I would like to apologise to @DPJHodges
I am sorry
I said to you in response to your tweet below:
"And please try and engage brain before your craven client sycophancy"
I would like to say sorry
Because I neglected to include consideration of the possible rationale's you could have for such a post
1. You did not understand the guidance
2. You did not understand the circumstance of Boris/Carrie
3. You are a sycophant craven client propagandist
Because I neglected to include consideration of the possible rationale's you could have for such a post
1. You did not understand the guidance
2. You did not understand the circumstance of Boris/Carrie
3. You are a sycophant craven client propagandist
Now
If I was a national newspaper columnist
And it was 1 or 2 - and I did not understand
I would try and research the topic to gain an understanding
And having reached that understanding or at least informed backdrop
I would evaluate and argue a case
If I was a national newspaper columnist
And it was 1 or 2 - and I did not understand
I would try and research the topic to gain an understanding
And having reached that understanding or at least informed backdrop
I would evaluate and argue a case
Not just a "What's the issue here"
Because many newspapers have covered this and provided said detail
As have many legal "experts"
e.g. see the thread below
Because many newspapers have covered this and provided said detail
As have many legal "experts"
e.g. see the thread below
https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/status/1450074422040309766
So when I said
"And please try and engage brain before your craven client sycophancy"
I presumed you would read the thread and come back with a reasoned response as to why in your judgement Boris Johnson did not break the rules
Instead you blocked me
"And please try and engage brain before your craven client sycophancy"
I presumed you would read the thread and come back with a reasoned response as to why in your judgement Boris Johnson did not break the rules
Instead you blocked me
Here's a fuller link to the thread of @JolyonMaugham
Perhaps @10DowningStreet @BorisJohnson can answer to it honestly
Perhaps @10DowningStreet @BorisJohnson can answer to it honestly
See also here
Why would they have to have their "version" of events
Why not simply the truth?
Why would they have to have their "version" of events
Why not simply the truth?
https://twitter.com/spectator/status/1450130406196621322
I think back fondly to the words of Thatcher
Margaret Thatcher 1963 (on Macmillan)
"The Prime Minister is a man of the highest integrity and honour and should not, therefore, suffer for someone whose standards were not as high as his own.”
Margaret Thatcher 1963 (on Macmillan)
"The Prime Minister is a man of the highest integrity and honour and should not, therefore, suffer for someone whose standards were not as high as his own.”
Also Margaret 1970 General Election Address
"We want a nation with high standards of integrity, tolerance and personal responsibility."
"We want a nation with high standards of integrity, tolerance and personal responsibility."
Margaret
"My Britain is one where the rule of law is upheld, impartially even against the most powerful bodies in our community and where those entrusted with upholding the law, whether policemen or judges, are given respect, support and encouragement. "
"My Britain is one where the rule of law is upheld, impartially even against the most powerful bodies in our community and where those entrusted with upholding the law, whether policemen or judges, are given respect, support and encouragement. "
Oh yes and also Margaret
From a speech to the Institute of Journalists
margaretthatcher.org/document/103789
From a speech to the Institute of Journalists
margaretthatcher.org/document/103789
I remember Summer 2020
I remember autumn and winter 2020
I remember as covid was being let rip (AGAIN)
Just how infuriating it was that the progress from earlier lockdowns was well spaffed away
And the ability to see family and friends in person at Christmas was lost
But hey one rule for the King
Just how infuriating it was that the progress from earlier lockdowns was well spaffed away
And the ability to see family and friends in person at Christmas was lost
But hey one rule for the King
Thank God Boris "did his best"
Because if this is his fucking "best"
I would hate to see what his "worst" would have looked like
Because if this is his fucking "best"
I would hate to see what his "worst" would have looked like
https://twitter.com/PandaScottish/status/1389904419689582592
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
