Reading the Popol Vuh brings to me a similar tragic sense as reading the work of Snorri Sturluson -- something lying at the terminus of a once rich heathen tradition -- a violent end (be it a bang or a whimper) at the hands of an ekarAkShasonnmAda. A mere glimpse of the rich
tradition leaving us hanging & wanting to know more but hitting the wall an extinction without fossilization. But what survives of the Maya tradition leaves us with a feel for how deep are the roots of natural religion& mythology in the history of human thought. By that very
realization it shows how utterly evil & pathological are the ekarAkShasa diseases of the mind and how every surviving heathen tradition should resist them. One can quickly glimpse some v.old elements like the origin mythologies, the wonder-working twin gods, nature of certain
ritual incantations. How can one who has studied the shruti not fail to see a kindred thought in their ritual observation of Venus at the rising of the sun (c.f. venas tat pashyat). This shows that motifs in our religion/mythosphere go back to an early time preceding the split of
the Beringians from the rest of the Inner Eurasians.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with manasataramgini

manasataramgini Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blog_supplement

24 Oct
This idea that somehow the marAThA v1s were doing something special, namely "secular v1ism" that was later emulated by other v1s in the peninsula is indeed a poorly supported idea coming out of "white indologists" & their fellow travelers. They have long spouted misconceptions
like the v1s dispersed throughout the subcontinent & beyond by earlier rulers being purveyors of a purely non-secular "vedism" or "tantrism". Any serious student will note that the v2s (real or honorary) were not doing this for some idealism like that which permeates occidental
academe (e.g. critical theories). Rather, it had a very practical function of utilizing v1s in a secular capacity as administrators. This "secular" function of the v1 goes back to the shruti & the marahaTTa v1s were simply 1 of the last great iterations of this phenomenon.Their
Read 6 tweets
18 Oct
@shrikanth_krish 1. There are authoritative pA~ncharAtra texts like jayAkhya which do explicitly specify the worship of gaNesha as known in common dharma:
ध्यायेत् ... स्थूलाङ्गम् एकदंष्ट्रं च लम्ब-क्रोडं गजाननम् |
The dhyAna is unambiguous and he not conflated with viShvaksena or his pArShada-s
@shrikanth_krish 2. It seems, given his name and function, viShvaksena evolved as a vaiShNava reflex of skanda. This is supported by the early kaumAra tradition where he is surrounded by the 4 vinAyaka-s like those companions of viShvaksena. Moreover, skanda played a key role in the creation of
@shrikanth_krish vinAyaka(-s) in one of the old traditions preserved in the voluminous skandapurANa. Notably, in a curious twist the shaiva vatulottara names skanda as viShvaksena and vishAkha as jayatsena once in the account of the AvaraNa of rudragaNa-s. An eastern tradition preserved in the
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
The text of the devikA-dhAtR^i and tvAShTrI-sArasvata oblations as per the taittirIya-shruti. Who is the deity dhAtR^i? The later itihAsa-purANa place him in the Aditya class. In the RV it may be an epithet for multiple deities, but explicitly it mentioned
github.com/somasushma/tex…
as an epithet for visvakarman, who in turn is an epithet of the ancient tvaShTR^i. tvaShTR^i accompanies the the wives of the gods & other goddesses at the ritual. He appears in a similar role accompanying the sarasvatI and sinIvAlI in the sArasvata rite. There sarasvatI is also
paired with the divine eagle deity (elsewhere tArkShyo ariShTanemiH or garutmant) manifesting in an androgynous aspect as sarasvant. Thus dhAtR^i in the devikAyAga should be taken as an ectype of tvaShTR^i who retains his fertilizing aspect seen in sArasvata rite. In the somayAga
Read 6 tweets
10 Oct
Some of the key sights marked, which 1 should see. Pleiades: 1. kR^ittikAH: the 0 point of old Indo-Aryan ecliptic of the yajuSh and AV traditions, naked eye open cluster. 2. M31: Andromeda galaxy: naked eye on a good night like in this picture. easy for small telescope/binocs
M33: some people claim to have seen it with naked eye!! I've only managed it with 20x80 binocs. Best with small telescope. M34: Binocs OK, great with small telescope. NGC752 best with small telescope, at least 6 in reflector.
alpha Persei: good starfield of the Milky Way near it
Perseus Double cluster: great even with binocs. Beta Persei,Algol: archetypal eclisping binary. Rho Persei: A nice red giant in the final stages of it is life. Epsilon Aurigae is strange giant eclipsing binary with 1 of the components probably being a binary itself with dust disk
Read 4 tweets
9 Oct
There has been some discussion about the removal of special schools/programs for "gifted children" in the US. This is a topic we have long wondered about: are these really useful? For an India parallel 1 could think of the IIT & some lesser know programs with a high entrance
threshold. 1 thing I learnt from classmates& relatives (& to a degree myself) who made use of entrance into a high threshold program is the obvious. If you enrich based on a cognitive criterion (\approx IQ) then you will get a pool of students who will show markedly above average
trajectories. This is simply a consequence of the filter rather than any special training. The 2nd thing is that once you have a threshold system, there will a bunch of individuals who will "crack it" to get in. Hence, it might not be a true measure of the "special ones" who
Read 22 tweets
5 Oct
There is this tantalizing fragment from the nishvAsaguhya where where nandin is explaining the pa~nchabrahma as per the vaimala& saiddhAntika tradition to a v1 interlocutor
पञ्च-मन्त्रमयं देवं पञ्च-मन्त्र-शरीरिणम् |
पञ्चमन्त्र ... मन्त्र ... सदाशिवम् ||
@GhorAngirasa @goghritaM
Unfortunately there are lacunae in the text & the next sentence is mostly lost but it seems to describe shiva's form as made up of the 5-brahma-s. nandin clearly lays out the objectives of the deployment of 5:
दीक्षा ज्ञानं च चर्या च मन्त्र-भूति-विनिर्णयम् |
मन्त्र-भूतार्थ-चर्या च रुद्र-सायोज्य-गामिनी ||
Note: mantra-bhUti-vinirNayaM: ascertaining the power of the mantra & and mantra-bhUtArtha-charyA: the practice of their actualization; the final objective is oneness with rudra.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(