@YoureAllDunces
Update in the ongoing investigation into disclosures to the public prior to release of vaccines.
A review of three more videos of participants in vaccine development and with credentials in microbiology, etc. reflected NO disclosures of the dangers of...
...the spike protein of the virus, and no disclosures of any safety measures to control the health threats of spike protein. The SP2 mutation of the spike protein, designed in the vaccine development labs, stabilized the spike protein in a "closed position."
This was so there would be a better immune response to the spike protein OF THE VACCINE, rather than to prevent the spike protein from binding to an ACE2 receptor of a cell.
It is also interesting to note that the spike protein is referred formally as a MUTATION called SP2. The variants, such as Delta, have mutated spike proteins which render inoperative the immune response of the vaccine.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@Nowheremaam@KathMLee1 They are using spike protein as the immune trigger. As I reported to TLAV @YoureAllDunces I have yet to find an early (2020-January 2021) article or video that: 1. Informs public spike protein is dangerous. 2. Documents steps taking in vaccine development to neutralize danger.
@Nowheremaam@KathMLee1@YoureAllDunces In addition to no documentation of steps taken to eliminate spike protein danger, we found statements from Shane Crotty, phd. in a video that two claims of "safety features" were false. Those claims were made after the danger of spike proteins were revealed to general public...
Dr. Crotty says the developers always knew all the vaccine would NOT stay in the arm muscle. They wanted the vaccine to enter "rare" immune cells to familiarize immune system with vaccine. Vaccine..
@YoureAllDunces Something else has to be broached as we confront the addition of this claimed safety feature for the vaccine spike protein that is supposed to prevent binding to ACE2 receptors.
The creation of the safety feature would further change the RNA genome of the vaccine's spike protein from the genome of the virus' spike protein. I don't think this fact is remotely debatable, but desperation can result in just about anything.
These differences in the appearances, and the genetic structures between the spike protein of the vaccine and the spike protein of the virus inspire questions about the nature of what constitutes a VARIANT of a virus.
I am trying to find out why the long-known data of the spike protein being the engine of COVID-19 was not disclosed prior to EUA of vaccines. This is my second attempt to address this since stories keep changing. I'm going back to original articles/videos...
...and creating a kind of index document, complete with links, identifying content that could cause people to be misinformed and lead to rabbit hole research, etc.
In the course of conducting research, the following related information was found:
In this video, we find out what makes a SELF-AMPLIFYING vaccine as opposed to a TRANSMISSIBLE vaccine, a frequent question.
@LL4DJT The vaccines cause your cells to make the Spike Protein, which is the dangerous aspect of the virus, which is just a type of CARRIER of the spike protein and basically does little to impact human health. An analogy of the relationship of the spike protein to the virus is here:
"Compared to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 is causing an even more severe pandemic due to its spreading speed and the population affected. Deep studies comparing the different disease-causing coronaviruses will shed light on the fundamental mechanisms of coronavirus
related diseases.
"Even though S proteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 share very similar structures, the binding affinities of S protein and ACE2 of SARS-CoV-2 are much higher than SARS-CoV (Koehl, 2018). This might be the key reason for SARS-CoV-2's faster-spreading speed,
@MichaelWeddle15@with_integrity@stranahan Why does Trump enact Neocon policies like the coup in Venezuela and putting troops in Syria in the first place? It needs to be explained why CrowdStrike told the story they told to WAPO on June 13, 2016--indirectly--that Fancy Bear did NOT steal the emails.
@MichaelWeddle15@with_integrity@stranahan That makes them look stupid when Guccifer 2.0 shows up and claims he stole the emails. When you look at Shawn Henry's declassified testimony to Congress, it APPPEARS that CrowdStrike thought Cozy Bear could have stolen the emails. CrowdStrike admitted they did not witness...
@MichaelWeddle15@with_integrity@stranahan ...most of the documents being exfiltrated, and cannot prove the Russians did it, only that they STAGED documents for exfiltration.
That is NOT setting the table for the "Russians stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks" scenario. So, why were at the DNC?