X : Why such a fan of Lambda?
Me : You have serverless i.e. the runtime as a utility (focus on code, price per function etc) plus its event driven plus a mass of services to consume and events to create in your serverless architecture. Why wouldn't I be a fan?
X : Kubernetes?
Me : I could argue about how Kubernetes misses the point, wins a battle that is irrelevant and loses the war but ..
X : Yes?
Me : ... can't we just wait? The war on serverless is over next year, spoiler AWS won and it's only a few more years until it's recognised as the new norm.
X : The war hasn't started in serverless,
Me : It started in 2014. It takes 5-8 years for the winners / losers to be decided (2019-2022) and 10-15 years (2024-2029) to become the "new norm".
X : How do you know this?
Me : You don't. But it's the same timings I used for cloud.
X : It's early days in serverless.
Me : No, it's not. It's nearly the end of war (winners / losers chosen) then we're into the washup (becoming the new norm) and finally the slow slog of the laggards. I've said this before -
If you really want a guide, here's a handy table ... bit out of date, a few years old but it'll do.
X : I think you're wrong on serverless.
Me : I've been told that I will be wrong on so many things and so many occassisons that I've stoped caring ... apparently the future should have been VCE or OpenStack or now Kubernetes ... well, it wasn't and it won't be.
X : You don't think Kubernetes is useful?
Me : I didn't say that. It's not the future but it has immediate use in dealing with inertia, legacy etc. Don't underestimate these things, you might have to make compromises as I tried to explain here - dxc.com/us/en/insights…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : When are you going to write some papers on strategy?
Me : No rush. People are still learning to map and most have never seen a map. More than enough value in communication, challenge, basic anticipation and applying doctrine (principles) for most for a decade or two.
X : But we need a strategy.
Me : Ok. The strategy is to stop punching yourself in the face as a company. For that most will need communication, challenge, situational awareness, applying doctrine etc ... for a decade or two.
X : I need more.
Me : I'm in no rush. Never have been.
X : I don't get you.
Me : Hmmm. Did you ever see my map of mapping?
X : Yes
Me : You understand where I am in conflict, where I am co-operating / collaborating with others and building an "army" of mappers?
X : Sort of, but ...
Taking the wee lad to the dentist, thought I'd check in myself. Apparently I'm no longer registered with the NHS because I haven't been for six years ... whoops ... oh well. I'm told I can go private ... maybe ... or maybe I'll just wait until I need to use a pair of pliers.
Quick search using the excellent NHS Dentist Finder- nhs.uk/service-search… ... and not an NHS dentist within 20 miles taking patients and that's where the list ran out.
Hmmm, private or pliers? private or pliers? Good thing there's nothing wrong at the mo. Modern Britain eh.
Talking to the dentist ... do you have a waiting list for the NHS? Aparrently they do, a total of 572 people are on the list. Asked how many make it off the list and become NHS patients per year ... apparently none in the last five years.
X : Thoughts on cloud repatriation?
Me : Zynga? Good luck.
X : No, Dropbox.
Me : Ok, in extremely rare, specialised and massive scale cases there could be an argument for it. However, the jury is still out on this. Are you the scale of dropbox with their specialist needs?
X : No.
Me : Fine. Well, in which case the same economics won't be at play. The positive argument won't exist.
X : No argument for in-house then?
Me : No. Inertia due to pre-existing capital or unwillingness of executive to change the system (i.e. too close to retirement) etc.
X : Not very positive.
Me : No, those reasons aren't but they exist and so you have to be mindful of it. In some cases you have to compromise to an enormous extent just to get some change happening. This is ok, as long as you are honest about it and don't hoodwink yourself.
X : Can you have feedback loops on maps?
Me : Sure. Why not?
X : Example?
Me : Ok, a completely made up example just for you - onlinewardleymaps.com/#RKlCASwJsBMdP…
X : Climate change is a model, solar power is a thing ... how do you mix the two.
Me : Remember this table. The x-axis are labels for stage I to IV ...
Me : So, for example ... I can pick a different axis. In this case, the axis of knowledge - onlinewardleymaps.com/#RKlCASwJsBMdP… ... it's the same thing. All stage I to IV, just different labels.
X : Thoughts on return to office?
Me : From a business perspective I would always look to adapt to the future rather than try to recreate the past whenever possible.
X : What about coffee shops and commercial property prices?
Me : Eh? Is your company a coffee shop or an investor in commercial property?
X : Insurance.
Me : So, why do you care then? You should be focused on what matters for your business and how your business adapts.
X : Where's that table from?
Me : You mean the text? It's from this report - leadingedgeforum.turtl.co/story/on-indus… ... it's not a table though. If you want a table, try this list of behavioural changes.
The pursuit of "kinder" politics should be a driving force for us all and not just in words between politicians but in action across society i.e. the £20 reduction in UC must be reversed, austerity must never return and we need a stronger social support structure in place.
X : Why mainstream?
Me : Elements of mainsteam media can be a major source of vile and vitriol in our society. We need to stop funding this hate -