The 3 daughters of Himavan performed penances and each attained a husband according to the rigor of her penance. There is an interesting tattva embedded in this.

Quoting from the Harivamsha as follows+
तिस्रः कन्याः तु मेनायां जनयामास शैल-राट् । अपर्णाम् एकपर्णां च त्रितीयाम् एकपाटलाम्

[The King of the mountains had three daughters through Mena – aparNa, ekaparNa and ekapAtalA as the third.]+
These 3 women performed penances in the form of abstentation from food for attaining a husband. Their determination in sticking to the penance is defined next+
आहारम् एक पर्णेन एकपर्णा समाचरत् । पाटला पुष्पम् एकं च आदधाउ एक पाटला

[One subsisted on a single leaf during her penances, hence she was called ekaparNa. One subsisted on a pAtalA flower, hence called ekapAtalA.]+
एका तत्र निराहारा तां माता प्रत्यषेधयत् । उ मा इति निषेधन्ती मातॄ स्नेहेन दुःखिता

[One did not subsist on anything, then her mother said, “u-mA" - "Oh, do not (perform this penance)” due to affection and sorrrow. ]+
The name “umA” indicates the rigor of her penance.

Meaning, it indicates that she always had a one-pointed focus, which is often the characteristic of a bhakti yogI who does not see anything other than Brahman+
“aparNa” means one who has no AhAra. “parNa” means leaf and is indicative of flower, fruit and water. Similarly, a bhakti yogI is one who sees nothing other than Brahman.

Note that aparNa was described after her sisters despite being the eldest. Will explain why later+
उमा तासां वरिष्ठा च ज्येष्ठा चवरवर्णिनी । महायोगबल उपेता महादेवम् उपस्थिता ॥

[umA who brings good fortune to her husband is the eldest and foremost among them in knowledge. Possessing strength of will (yoga-bala), she attained proximity with mahAdeva.]+
Because umA had one pointed focus of mind on attaining her desired husband and had no desire for AhAra, she attained mahAdeva, a bhakti yogI with one pointed meditation on Brahman and no desire for anything else.

The qualities of the wife, support the qualities of the husband+
असितस्य एकपर्णा तु देवलस्य महात्मनः  पत्नी दत्ता महाब्रह्मन् योगाचार्याय धीमते

[EkaparNA was wedded to the intelligent, noble Devala, also called Asita, a great one possessed of all the qualities of the self, the teacher of karma yoga.]+
EkaparNA ate a leaf and EkapAtalA ate a flower. A leaf is produced before a flower and is more ubiquitous.

Thus, it signifies EkaparNA was more eager for food, and thus attained Devala (or Asita), who has attained a vision of the self by karma yoga, a path of action+
This is indicated by “महाब्रह्मन्” – Great one who is manifesting all the qualities of the self acquired by Karma Yoga.

He is thus, “योगाचार्य” – One who teaches “yoga” or “skill in action” (karma yoga) by his own conduct+
The idea being, karma yoga is for those who cannot easily control their senses, it is a path to visualize the self. Thus, ekaparNA who was eager to satiate her hunger attained a husband who pursued karma yoga+
जैगीषव्याय तु तथा विद्धि ताम् एकपाटलाम्। एते चापि महाभागे योगाचार्याउ उपस्थिते

[Know ekapATalA as the wife of jaIShavya. These two attained proximity with these teachers of the science of the self.]+
ekapATalA ate a flower. The flower comes after a leaf, and hence it means she waited for awhile before succumbing to hunger.

Thus, she wedded jaigIShavya, who is a j~nAna yogI. This has the same goal as karma yoga, but is a path of renouncing action, ie, meditation+
J~nAna yoga is more difficult than karma yoga, but both lead to the same goal of self-realization. Thus, it is said, both devala/asita and jaigIShavya are “yogAchAryAs” – teachers of the science of the self by conduct.

MB also refers to them as karma and j~nAna yogIs+
Thus, the 3 sisters – aparNa, ekAparNa and ekapATalA – attained husbands proficient in bhakti yoga, karma yoga and j~nAna yoga in accordance to their qualities which suited the means that their husbands are undertaking+
In the beginning, aparNa's penance was described last and ekaparNA's was described first. ekapATalA's was described second.

This is because karma yoga leads to j~nAna yoga which leads to bhakti yoga. Hence, the order+
But in specifying the husbands they married, aparNa's is mentioned first, ekaparNA's is mentioned second and ekapATalA's is mentioned last.

This is because bhakti yoga is the principal upAya and other 2 are accessories. So aparNa's husband was mentioned first. Also+
Though j~nAna yoga is a difficult upAya and ekapATalA had greater strength of mind, shAstra recommends karma yoga as it is far easier to perform. j~nAna yoga can even be skipped and karma yoga leads directly to bhakti yoga+
Thus, ekaparNa's husband was described before ekapATalA's. Also, just as ekapATalA is the youngest of the three and thus subservient to ekaparNa despite being mentally more focused than her, j~nAna yoga is inferior to karma yoga during to it's difficulty+
This is why shAstra describes even small things of no consequence, like who ekaparNa/ekapATalA married etc. They all contain some teaching on brahmavidyA.//

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dark Saint

Dark Saint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DefiledGod

25 Oct
shAstra highly glorifies waking up bhagavAn from his sleep, as in the case of Venkatesha suprabhAta.

Why so? First we need to know he wakes us up from our sleep. As mAndukya upanishad says,

अनादिमायया सुप्तो यदा जीवः प्रबुध्यते । अजम् अनिद्रम् अस्वप्नम् अद्वैतं बुध्यते तदा+
[When the jIva in the sleep of ignorance due to prakR^iti is awakened (by bhagavad anugraha), then it realizes that Brahman manifested by the praNava (अजम्), who is sleepless (अनिद्रम्), opposed to evil dreams, ie, the purifier (अस्वप्नम्), who is incomparable (अद्वैतं)]+
The awakened jIva realizes bhagavAn as his master being the akAra of praNava, sleepless or always alert in protecting the jIva, destroyer of “(bad) dreams” – denotes destruction of sins - and he does this without another to support him, as the independent, incomparable one+
Read 25 tweets
24 Oct
While karma is understood as bhagavAn's will, the sharIrAtma bhAva system of VA makes you understand how that will of bhagavAn truly operates

Your body often does things which gives you, the Atma, pleasure or displeasure in varying degrees+
Pleasure can be anything from having a good hairstyle to achieving goals like becoming fit enough to be an athlete etc. in varying degrees

Displeasure can be anything from having a passing bad/unwanted thought to contracting a deadly illness+
Similarly, Ishvara, who has all as his bodies, knows every intimate detail of those bodies and feels a like or dislike at their actions, which in turn is the puNya or pApa in varying degrees based on the severity of the action+
Read 5 tweets
22 Oct
Though it is considered so, the shAnti parva of MB has a dialogue on the greatness of the sword between bhIShma and nakula.

When brahmA resolved to destroy the daityAs, a being arose before him, which assumed the form of a sword. This was bhagavAn himself, the very first sword+
ततस्तद्रुपमुत्सृज्य बभौ निस्त्रिंश एवसः…ततस्तं नीलकण्ठाय रुद्रायर्षभकेतवे । ब्रह्मा ददावसिं

[That being abandoning his form, assumed a form of a sword…brahmA gave that sword to Rudra, who has a dark throat from protecting the gods & the bull signifying dharma as his banner.]+
mahAdeva, with the form of bhagavAn as a sword in his hand, assumed a terrible form which gave great fear to the dAnavAs. He killed them all+
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
I had earlier posted about garuDa's leelas concerning Sumukha, comparisons with mahAdeva and him being the leader of upAsakAs.

Here is one more important leela of his, demonstrating the seriousness of bhAgavata-apachAra, described in Udyoga Parva+
Galava surrendered to bhagavAn for repaying a debt to vishvAmitra. So, bhagavAn sent garuDa & the two reached a hill in the course of their travels.

ऋषभस्य ततः शृङ्गं निपत्य द्विजपक्षिणौ । शाण्डिलीं ब्राह्मणीं तत्र ददृशो तपोन्विताम् । अभिवाद्य सुपर्णस्तु गालवश्चाभिपूज्य ताम् ।+
[Descending on the peak of the R^ishabha mountain, the two – galava and garuDa, saw the brAhmaNa woman shANDiIi living there, endowed with knowledge of Brahman. They respectfully honored her.]

shANDili was a great bhAgavatA residing there and she gave them shelter+
Read 22 tweets
3 Oct
That Gita Shloka reminded me of something.

When bhagavAn performs a penance towards mahAdeva for gaining a son, he adopts this form:

जटी चीरी जगन्नाथो मानुषं वपुरास्थितः 

[The master of the Universe, was in a form like a human, wearing matted hair & a strip of cloth]+
विस्म्यस्थितलोलाक्षाः सर्वदेवगणास्तथा । आश्चर्यं खलु पश्यद्वं न भूतं न भविष्यति

[The gods were rolling their eyes in wonder, “Look at this wonder, there has never been anything like this in the past nor will there be in the future”.]+
This form astonished the gods for two reasons -

1) They had never before seen bhagavAn bowing to another, and were struck with wonder by his soushIlya

2) He was wearing a single strip of cloth. His backside was visible. bhagavAn's backside is more beautiful than his front!+
Read 9 tweets
1 Oct
Here it is. Fairly straightforward.

आपो वा इदम् अग्रे सलिलम् आसीत् / तेन प्रजापतिर् अश्राम्यत् // 

[All this was verily water, existing as the essence of water – the solidified cosmic egg. With that, prajApati (bhagavAn) exerted effort of thought on creation.]+
कथम् इदँ स्याद् इति / सो ऽपश्यत् पुष्करपर्णं तिष्ठत् /

[“How will this (Earth) come to be”, thus reflecting, he saw a lotus leaf, standing in the water. ]
सो ऽमन्यत /अस्ति वै तत् /यस्मिन्न् इदम् अधि तिष्ठति इति / 

[He considered, “There exists that (lotus leaf) in which this (Earth) is (staying)]

Engal Azhwan explains in Vishnu purANa commentary that the cosnic egg of the form of the lotus leaf - पुष्करपर्णं - was flooded+
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(