The thing that struck me most about the recent void data is that at one point (see @OliasDave animation - and h/t to him for digging into this in the first place) voids hit nearly 10%. Which is more than the known prevalence at the time.
https://twitter.com/profcolindavis/status/1452285348453752840
This is not #IMMENSA specific data but regional data aggregated from all labs
So some may be very low in voids and others even higher
So lab specific void data would be very helpful, as would data about the numbers & percentage IMMENSA handled from each tests site each day/week
So some may be very low in voids and others even higher
So lab specific void data would be very helpful, as would data about the numbers & percentage IMMENSA handled from each tests site each day/week
I recall that around last September there were large numbers of voids from one lab. Maybe more. Which one(s)? What was the cause(s)?
And Randox binned large numbers (which they said took too long to get to them).
What is the KPI contractual measure for voids?
And Randox binned large numbers (which they said took too long to get to them).
What is the KPI contractual measure for voids?
That is a really really striking outlying peak in voids and not just the SW and SE.
And I agree with @ProfColinDavis it looks as if the NW might be worth paying attention to.
How much was sent to Immensa from that Region and when
And I agree with @ProfColinDavis it looks as if the NW might be worth paying attention to.
How much was sent to Immensa from that Region and when
It is possible this has nothing to do with Immensa
But it would be helpful to know.
Meanwhile, given tests were sent to Immensa from Wales it would be interesting to see the lab void patterns there.
But it would be helpful to know.
Meanwhile, given tests were sent to Immensa from Wales it would be interesting to see the lab void patterns there.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
