Big picture & neutral Jimmy Lake evaluation thread.

I have a formula (#CoachEvaluation) that grades FBS head coaches.

I've yet to deep test for predictive value. Anecdotally it works, but I have a lot of work to do before I'd feel really good using it in front of an AD.

1/25
A little about the #CoachEvaluation formula...

Conceptually, it compares the performance of a team in a HC's tenure w/ the that of the team in the years prior to the HC's hire. Using advanced metrics, with the goal being to be fair to both coaches taking over strong

2/25
programs (to avoid the "nowhere to go but down" dynamic) and coaches taking over bad programs. It knows that reasonable expectations are drastically different, both across teams in any given moment, and within the same program over different eras.

Are there potential

3/25
underlying factors beyond the on-field product (even the metrics on-field)? Absolutely. I think of the SB Nation article "The mess that Jimbo left".

But my position is that those issues are very difficult to measure and tend to be formulated in support of an

4/25
agenda, not neutral analysis.

The formula is scaled from -100% to 100%.

The best #CoachEvaluation HC tenures of all time? (min 5 years)

94% Saban, Alabama (14)
89% Johnson, Miami (5)
87% Sherrill, Pitt (5)
83% Stoops, Oklahoma (18)
82% Devaney, Nebraska (11)

5/25
The worst #CoachEvaluation HC tenures of all time? (min 3 years)

-94% Knoll, New Mexico State (4)
-94% Locksley, New Mexico (3)
-94% Zechman, New Mexico State (3)
-93% Blackledge, Kent State (3)
-90% Berry, Army (4)

Apologies to the men listed above 😂.

6/25
How about current head coaches.

Best #CoachEvaluation HC tenures, sitting HCs entering 2020

94% Saban, Alabama (14)
90% Day, Ohio State (2)
74% Mullen, Florida (3)
69% Swinney, Clemson (12)
68% Smart, Georgia (5)
66% Campbell, Iowa State (5)

7/25
Worst #CoachEvaluation HC tenures, sitting HCs entering 2020 (min 2 years)

-95% Loeffler, Bowling Green (2)
-91% Arth, Akron (2)
-83% Hammock, Northern Illinois (2)
-67% Collins, Georgia Tech (2)
-64% Dimel, UTEP (3)
-57% Carey, Temple (2)

8/25
It should be noted that it is a purely ratio calculation, there is no counting element. So Joe Paterno sticking around for 127 years, that does nothing.

It goes w/out saying that responsible interpretation of these numbers needs to consider the length of the tenure.

9/25
Here are the #CoachEvaluation scores for past UW coaches

70% Petersen (6)
43% Sarkisian (5)
-45% Willingham (4)
-49% Gilbertson (2)
-9% Neuheisel (4)
-10% Lambright (6)
67% James (18)
7% Owens (18)

10/25
And because we are talking about Jimmy Lake, here are the #CoachEvaluation scores for UW coaches, at the end of their 2nd year

-45% Lake (in progress)
43% Petersen
30% Sarkisian
-23% Willingham
-49% Gilbertson
10% Neuheisel
-11% Lambright
40% James
-35% Owens

11/25
The #CoachEvaluation for UW HCs in other tenures.

51% Petersen, Boise State (8)

-12% Sarkisian, USC (2)

-13% Willingham, Notre Dame (3)
1% Willingham, Stanford (7)

-19% Gilbertson, Cal (4)

-39% Neuheisel, UCLA (4)
-11% Neuheisel, Colorado (4)

12/25
And to cause us all some pain 😢😢😢

26% Pinkel, Toledo (10)
20% Pinkel, Toledo (8)
49% Pinkel, Missouri (15)

Year 8 at Toledo is when UW could've hired him instead of Neuheisel. We know Gary Pinkel was great at Missouri, but he was also very solid at Toledo.

13/25
This is highly anecdotal, being limited to 1 out of 130 programs, but I am proud of how it's handled UW.

Petersen: stud before, stud during, no further analysis needed

Sarkisian: loved him at UW (the formula's most polarizing opinion), USC obvious an asterisk

14/25
Willingham: average (overhyped) coach at Stanford that was never deserving of the opp at ND, an opp he didn't earn...the firing at ND was a tad aggressive, but wholly vindicated by his job at UW

15/25
Neuheisel: charmed existence (got 3 good jobs, left all 3 in worse shape) never should've been hired b/c CU regressed under his watch ... @cougsgo was right, he was hired b/c Barbara Hedges had a crush on him

Lambright: after 6 years, it was time to move on

16/25
James: obviously a stud, but it also liked him after Y1 & Y2 as well, would've been in support of him even before he won the 1977 Rose Bowl....he had things moving in the right direction from the jump

Owens: looks average b/c he stayed too long, was at 28.2% after year 11

17/25
If the 2021 season ended today, Jimmy Lake's #CoachEvaluation score would be -45%.

Historically, that score would put him in the 18th percentile of all measured HC tenures after year 2.

18/25
What does that mean? What's the historical context for HCs who score in a similar range through their 2nd year? Are there any success stories?

19/25
Since WWII, there are 202 FBS HCs to #CoachEvaluation score between -30% and -60% after their 2nd year (heading into 2020).

As of today, Coach Lake would sit squarely in the middle of this group. This is his peer group as of right now.

20/25
Of these 202

- 24 were gone after year 2 (almost all presumably fired)

- 41 were gone after year 3 (w/ no promotions that I could detect)

- 39 were gone after year 4 (no promotions)

- 38 were gone after year 5 (w/ 2 promotions, Bobby Ross at GT & Ken Hatfield at AF)

21/25
- 36 clawed their way back to finish the stint w/ a positive score (regardless of departure terms)

- 166 finished w/ a negative score

- of those given at least 3 years, average finishing score was -25%

- of those given 4+ years, average finishing score was -18%

22/25
- of those given 4+ years, the average performance in years 3-4 was at 92% the level of inheritance

^ in years 1-2, the performance of this group averaged 57.4% the level of the inheritance

In other words, things got better, but not to the point where they were before

23/25
Who are the success stories? They do exist.

#CoachEvaluation score after Y2 / Final

-34% / 64% : McKay, USC (16)
-31% / 48% : Crowder, Colorado (11)
-42% / 27% : McCartney, Colorado (13)
-46% / 41% : Mason, Kansas
-37% / 37% : Beamer, VT (29)

24/25
(hope, cont)

#CoachEvaluation score after Y2 / Final

-31% / 37% : Ross, GT (5)
-54% / 34% : Leipold, Buffalo (6)
-36% / 32% : O'Brien, BC (10)
-35% / 22% : Mallory, Indiana (13)
-51% / 22% : Ferentz, Iowa (22)
-39% / 20% : Fitzgerald, Northwestern (15)

25/25

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Percival

Andrew Percival Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PDawg206

24 Oct
Best #CoachEvaluation comps to Jimmy Lake

^ Y2 score -30% to -60% (Lake now is -45%)
^ P5
^ since 2000
^ no deep rebuilds

Y2 / Final (sorted by inheritance quality)

-57% / -50% : Rodriguez, Michigan (3)
-42% / -42% : Taggart, FSU (3)
-32% / -15% : Shannon, Miami (4)

1/4
-38% / -37% : Strong, Texas (3)
-31% / -23% : Tuberville, Texas Tech (3)
-49% / -49% : Gilbertson, UW (2)
-31% / -41% : Prince, Kansas State (3)
-37% / -41% : Rhule, Baylor (3, promoted)
-32% / -39% : Neuheisel, UCLA (4)
-42% / -50% : Kragthorpe, Louisville (3)

2/4
-36% / -23% : Kingsbury, Texas Tech (6, promoted)
-48% / -9% : Sitake, BYU (5, sitting)
-45% / -57% : Mackovic, Arizona (3)
-39% / -42% : Hawkins, Colorado (5)
-31% / -13% : Dykes, Cal (4)
-47% / -46% : Brewster, Minnesota (4)
-30% / 25% : Sherman, Texas A&M (4)

3/4
Read 4 tweets
1 Aug
Without Texas & Oklahoma, can the Big 12 continue performing as a power conference * on the field * ?

Yes it can.

A thread ... @BobBowlsby

1/
First let's state the obvious, that losing Texas & Oklahoma is a blow.

Since 2017, they've been the two best programs in the Big 12. Oklahoma has been the clear #5 nationally, with a ceiling, but an extremely high floor.

National SRS, 2017-2020

images2.imgbox.com/32/5f/uuS0QmCr…

2/
We can poke fun at Texas for a bad stretch from 2013-2017.

In the CFP era, TCU & Oklahoma State posted higher avg SRS ratings, and UT's hypothetical inclusion in the SEC would've actually * lowered * the SEC's avg SRS. LOL.

National SRS, 2014-2020

images2.imgbox.com/32/5f/uuS0QmCr…

3/
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(