Many vocal professional opponents of psychiatry will hide behind philosophy and pedantry to drum up business for their own benefit, whilst clearly aware of the hypocrisy of their ideological crusade.
Much of it is narcissism disguised as "protecting others."
As a psychiatrist also training in psychodynamics, we both work within working models adjusted by idiosyncracy and marred by our own subjectivity, so perhaps such poignant opposition tells us more about one's blindness than vision.
I have seen some force patients off medication, others make false allegations, and even more quote charlatans to undermine those who wish to help. None of us are perfect, but those who claim omnibenificence are, frankly, no better than snake oil salesmen.
Id rather sit here in a place of educated general cynicism and be ready to learn than a false ivory tower made of my own narcissm and the cash of those I have misled.
It is fair to air grievances against issues with individuals and even within theoretical structures, but this needs to be informed (the former,) and resolute from hypocrisy (the latter.) If one can show me a fair example of both then you please teach me.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 40 minutes I turn 33 years old, and every year passed gives me pause to reflect on how a deal I made in my youth. When I was 24, and severely depressed, I imposed the date of my own execution. If things did not improve by age 30, that was it.
I was going through therapy at the time, and probably my 3rd major depressive episode, but quite certainly the worst until that point. In truth, it carried on in some fashion until I was around 29, before disappearing for a brief time. At this time the deal was still there.
Around 2017 I suffered the worst depressive episode, and during that time decided to move into psychiatry. In a grandiose manner, I decided to sublimate my pain into helping others. This was selfish, to think my experiences would entitle me to such responsibility.
Some days I find myself overwhelmed by the true responsibility I find myself wielding. The power that comes from it, the fear I must counsel and the insanity I must often make sense. Today was a day like this. Today I made some realisations.
I refer mainly to acute psychosis and its treatment, including the need to bring people into the hospital. This can be a shock, not just to them, but to their families. A family has its own culture, as well as a greater one. An admission can mean different things to each one.
For many, they see the admission of their loved one as a failure of their own function, as if they are to blame for one's sickness. I rarely saw this in general medicine, as if physical illness had a special exception from blaming one's self.
Just spoke at length to people protesting #covid19 vaccine in teenagers. They held placards quoting MHRA death figures and asking why the media was complicit. Here is a little more on what came up
First, they did not know that most reporting systems such as VAERs are not analysed. They did not understand the need for covariate analysis and what the data actually means.
Secondly, they claimed that no doctor had said that myocarditis from the vaccine is less risky than from covid. Many did not know how covid kills people, or once again about how the data could be skewed. Their research appeared very one sided.
Turn on GB news for Breakfast rage against the refugees with Katie Hopkins. Turn my kettle to 189 Fahrenheit and empty 4oz of coffee into my 3-hands width chuckle-brothers mug. It will be a good day in the mines.
Its 4 cubits past eleventy, and mandatory tea and national anthem break. We salute statue of Moggmentum and pay pride tax. Lunch of carrot and a crown pint. In afternoon we get ready for book inspection, no forrin names. Ride daily bus home.
Radio tuned to Priti Patel reading list of dissident children as red-faced men spittle in displaced rage from their failed marriages. Dinner is wetherspoons fine british slurry. 8pm curfew apart from drinkers, got to level up. Rishi sunak patrols westminster to check.
Looking forward to 'more British shows on TV. I have a few pitches:
'Queues and views.'
Piers Morgan interviews people in the Greggs queue about controversial political issues and then storms out. Celebrity guests include Johnny Vegas and Larry the Cat
The ghost of Maggie Thatcher invades the homes of pensioners and ensures they are not drinking PG tips. Episode one includes Judi Dench performing an exorcism. Music provided by Ed Sheeran.
'Priti Patel; Refugee roundup'
A documentary series follows the beleaguered home secretary as she teams up with the 'Clandestine threat commander' to chase asylum seekers with a large net. Sponsored by Wetherspoons. Music by Morrisey.
Hope this helps clear it up (some good explanation here)
- Pleb
Alot of it has been "we have a natural immunity to covid 19." This is only true, as per above, if we have been infected with it. We don't have a natural immunity without exposure, just the ability to develop it. And not all immunity is total.
Someone referring to the acute phase response (i.e the initial non-specific response, fever etc) is referring to part of the immune response, but the term "natural immunity" refers to this priming process as explained above. In covid 19,acute phase response is not enough for many