1/ What if I told you that the biggest and most urgent problem associated with our sewage system isn't the public health and environmental threat of discharges of human waste into bodies of water? You might not believe me, but it's true...
2/ As serious an environmental problem as sewage discharges are, it's the permanent loss of a very specific mineral carried in our sewage that poses the biggest threat of all.
Let's talk about phosphorous.
3/ Phosphorous is an essential component of the artificial fertilisers that have helped increase agricultural yields enormously since the Second World War. However, the Earth's phosphorous deposits are fixed, unevenly-distributed, and being depleted at an alarming rate.
4/ At current consumption, we'll run out of phosphorus reserves less than 80 years, but consumption is also expected to increase. Nearly 90% of phosphorus is used in the global food supply chain; most as fertilisers. If no action is taken, world food supplies will collapse.
5/ The main means by which phosphorus re-enters the soil after consumption via plants or feed is through animal waste. Although manure is still commonly used as fertiliser, human waste is no longer returned directly to the soil as it once was and is often released to the ocean.
6/ By processing human waste in an 'open loop' through ocean discharge, and failing to capture agricultural runoff, vast quantities of phosphorous are lost for hundreds of thousands of years out in the infinite oceanic abyssal plain at 6km depth. (van Ginneken et al 2016)
7/ Efficient use of fertiliser - the U.S has dramatically reduced its use of phosphorous over the past 30 years due to more efficient farming practices and greater utilization of organic waste - can slow phosphorous losses, but not eliminate them, so recycling is essential.
8/ Although most of the recoverable phosphorous in human waste is currently discarded, municipal collection and processing of wastewater provide a mechanism for recycling large quantities of phosphorus with relative ease.
9/ Struvite - magnesium ammonium phosphate - is a hard, clear crystal that occurs naturally when ammonium-producing bacteria break down the urea in urine. It causes kidney stones, and for centuries, it has been the bane of sewage system operators the world over, but...
10/ ...struvite is also a benign, non-toxic substance, which can be used as a rich, slow-release phosphate fertilizer. In fact, struvite outperforms the most widely-used fertilizer in the world today. Viewing it as a problem, rather than a valuable resource, *is* the problem.
11/ But, there's hope! Low carbon techniques for phosphorous capture from human waste have been developed in recent years. These prevent struvite buildup in pipes, reduce phosphorus pollution in water basins, and generate valuable phosphorus fertilizers. civil.ubc.ca/news-events/20…
12/ Good and improving practice on recycling finite phosphorous can already by encountered in The EU, Canada, and the US. By 2007, 53% of sewage sludges in the EU (80% in the U.K) were already reused in agriculture.
13/ In 2009, Sweden passed legislation to have at least 60% of its total phosphorus streams from wastewater diverted for agricultural use by 2015. By 2009, struvite systems had been installed in Edmonton, Alberta; Oregon; and Pennsylvania. Progress is both necessary and possible.
14/ However, the big challenge lies with China, India, and other developing nations. Early adoption of practices that help capture and reintroduce significant amounts of high-quality, renewable phosphate fertilizer from human waste would slow depletion and improve food security.
15/ From a U.K perspective, the challenge of phosphorous depletion is also acute. As we have no domestic deposits of phosphorous, recycling and stockpiling should be a national strategic priority. In the absence of a publicly-owned water system, better regulation is key.
16/ The Gov't showed this week that it can take a muscular regulatory approach to water companies. As with its plans to mandate water companies to reduce sewage discharges, it should immediately move to mandate phosphorous recycling from wastewater. theguardian.com/environment/20…
17/ For a deeper dive into this issue, I'd encourage people to read this fantastic piece from MIT's Mission2016, which I've leaned heavily on for this thread.
🧱 The built environment represents 40% of U.K emissions, but the #Treasury's approach to the decarbonisation of this sector is an object lesson in how a lack of joined-up thinking is taking us away from our legally-binding #netzero carbon commitments.
🔨It can take between 10 and 80 years for a new, energy-efficient building to offset the emissions created during the construction process.
💷 But the U.K tax system militates against low carbon retrofit and upgrades to existing buildings by levying 20% VAT on renovations, while zero-rating new build homes. This means it often makes more financial sense to demolish and rebuild, rather than preserve and upgrade.
1/ Just encountered a City Council seeking to spend a large budget on street trees. Good news, were it not for the way in which they want to distribute funding, which risks perpetuating inequality of access to tree canopy and failing to maximise the trees' environmental benefits.
2/ The Council in question is inviting people to apply for street trees, rather than developing its own plan. Since street trees can increase property prices by 15%+, such an approach risks unevenly impacting housing costs and driving gentrification. poverty.ac.uk/report-welfare…
3/ This isn't an argument against delivering street trees - they are an environmental/public health necessity in the urban environment - it's an argument for distributing them evenly and on a rationale basis, so they can't become a force for inequality. audubon.org/news/in-los-an…
What if I told you there was a single intervention we could deliver in our cities that would cool them during heatwaves, reduce flooding, scrub pollutants from the air, boost biodiversity, improve public health, and even reduce crime? You wouldn't believe me. But it's true.
What if I told you one study in Manchester found that shade from street trees reduced surface temperatures by an average of 12°C and that concrete surfaces shaded permanently by a bank of trees were cooled by up to 20°C in the summer? You wouldn't believe me. But it's true.
What if I told you that a single young tree planted in a small pit over an impermeable asphalt surface can reduce rain runoff by around 60%, even during winter when not in leaf? You wouldn't believe me, but it's true.
Cressida Dick applying the judgement for which she has become renowned. Not only are many new modal filters completely open to emergency services, creating blue light priority zones, but, LTNs are proven to reduce crime. The Met should prescribe them. thetimes.co.uk/article/178753…
What kind of Commissioner of the Metropolis would claim - without evidence - that Low Traffic Neighbourhoods 'hinder response times' while ignoring their proven record at reducing crime? I'll let you make your own mind up.
Not only is there no evidence to support the Commissioner's claims regarding emergency response times, there is evidence to contrary. I'd add, London is *full* of bollards and obstructions jointly delivered by Councils and the Met for the purposes of 'hostile vehicle mitigation'.