Say we actually wanted to curb climate change. Not stop it, but slow the rate of increase. Say that was the objective of COPXXVI (we name them like Stupor Bowls, right?)
Addressing climate change is expressly not the objective of COP. The objective is maintaining economic growth.
2. But say, instead, we wanted to curb it.
What causes climate change? We do things which are powered by fossil fuels and at least one direct outcome of that is climate change. The fuels leave molecules in the atmosphere.
3. OK, so, if you want to refuse climate change, you look at your life and you say, what things can I not do that are powered by fuel? What can I leave out?
We live in a world which expends energy to manufacture leaf blowers.
They are powered by fuel. Yes, the electric ones too.
4. 4. We live in a world in which people fly from continent to continent for fun. Lots of people.
And we fly our stuff around too. The reason we do this is because a few people make money on it.
Only a few.
Probably not you.
5. Countries ship identical products and commodities back and forth - we buy and sell the same grains from the same countries, send them soybeans and buy soybeans from them, the same with oil.
This really only took off in the Clinton Administration, to the current extent.
6. Free trade.
There is a case to be made that free trade as we now practice it economically harms more people worldwide than it benefits. But it's a *giant* source of climate change.
For sure, inequality and economic separation has increased wildly along with free trade.
7. You got all these guys from Democratic Administrations tweeting about inequality, but not following it back. Climate change and economic inequality are caused by the same processes.
We are pursuing this in a silver bullet chase, the Holy Grail of carbon free energy, and
8. Huge amounts of our energy are wasted for the sole purpose of generating economic activity. GDP is basically a measure of how much money changes hands every year. It has no relevance to people's lives. We have blasted into this high speed global thing, and Amazon tells you
9. Tells me tells us, what a person is worth a day.
Most Americans live like shit, and compared to the rest of the world we're kings.
10. The nations of the world could be agreeing on speed limits.
I'm tired of "people won't." If the fucking governments of the world said, "You will drive slower or we will take away your money and eventually your privilege to drive at all," their citizens would slow down.
11. Everything discussed at COP will take place in the far-off future and right now today it will be a giant market for ever more fossil fuels faster Amen and Amen.
12. The Supply Chain Crisis is because WE'RE SHIPPING MORE CRAP THAN WE CAN UNLOAD AND HAUL AWAY for crying out loud, and we're going to fly to Scotland to wring our hands about it.
If I wanted to curb climate change I damn sure wouldn't build 1.3 trillion dollars worth of
13. Highways, bridges, airports, seaports, and high speed rail.
Speaking of "things we do which require fuel."
That's the question. "What things that we do, that require fuel, can we halt or do less of more slowly?"
There is no other way, under the laws of physics, to use less ⛽
14. All of this would cause a direct reduction in GDP, which is supposed to be a bad thing.
I guess we'd get to see if we're smart enough to figure it out and do that ol' thing about when life hands you lemons, coz...
They're not going to talk about any of this.
15. They are going to talk about pie in the sky bye and bye, and make pledges, and 99.975% of all the Right Thinking People in the developed world will believe that some tax provision is Meaningful Climate Action... And our fossil fuel use will climb on. theguardian.com/environment/20…
16. We, down here at the bottom, we can't cause this by looking at our lives, although we can apply pressure in some ways. Driving slower than the speed limit applies downward pressure on system-wide fuel use.
17. Each thing that uses fuel. Car racing. Why? Air shows. Why? Billionaires to the edge of space. Why? Leaf blowers. Why?
How many things can we figure out how to use less fuel doing? Rethink lawns. Where can we grow something? All these things would actually move matter for us.
18. Our leaders meet and their sole objective is to maximize GDP growth while frequently saying the word "climate." GDP growth is powered by fossil fuels.
We've got to break the whole machine, and figure out how to live small and slow, to reach real world zero.
19. And zero is nowhere near good enough. We've got to get Earth to uptake and hold ever increasing amounts of carbon on every square meter if we want to have a chance.
Life.
They won't be discussing this at COP either. Manufacturing machinery. Bulldozing and paving. GDP growth.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff McFadden

Jeff McFadden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @homemadeguitars

29 Oct
I've taken the day, before now, off Twitter.
If I had a human community here I wouldn't "need" social media. Social media is only necessary in a dead society.
I wish I were Amish. They are the last surviving cohesive community in America, maybe in the developed world.
2. The Amish chose to not accept tractors and cars specifically because they had the wisdom to see that it would tear their community apart, the power to travel away, the power to not need your neighbors.
We shoot each other instead.
I massively do not belong in developed America
3. I'm tired, tireder than you could possibly imagine, of being the sole voice for reducing fuel use in the present and immediate future. Tired of hearing the pushback, tired of making my case, tired of speaking for physics and facts. It's not worth doing in techno America
At all
Read 5 tweets
27 Oct
Long time readers know that I believe the core beginning action to combat climate change is to reduce our surface speed. Reduce transportation speed. Reduce the national speed limit 5 mph, per year, until it reaches 15 mph or the speed of a running horse.
This raises eyebrows.
2. You don't need to tell me people won't this is impossible, I got all that.
This is only if we actually wanted to combat climate change, which we don't.
If we wanted to combat climate change we would take action to reduce emissions now.
Lots of obvious ways, but speed > all.
3. From here I could proceed several different ways.
My focus on speed is a giant yawner. Everyone is like, yeah, right, let's do something *big*. Slowing down isn't worth the effort.
So let's talk about speed, energy, and transportation.
Using my favorite graphic. Image
Read 15 tweets
26 Oct
I was depressed this afternoon, tired, sore, stiff. The Biden Administration and its climate theater has monumentally depressed me. All these people I'd rather agree with think Meaningful Action is being taken, or blocked by Manchin, or whatever, and it's like, bandaid magic. Image
I'd pissed away a bunch of the day scrolling Twitter and getting more and more depressed, so I didn't have enough time to harness up the girls and do anything. It takes almost half an hour to harness them.
Been real windy all day. Wind makes me tired.
So I got my bucket, and my sickle, my bottle of water, and my file (to touch up the sickle edge) and went over to the east savannah to see how many chestnuts had survived the brutal summer.
I've got some down on the edge of the riparian woods, but the hillsides are harder.
Read 11 tweets
13 Oct
I have so many great friends on here. I'm having a conversation with one now.
This thing we're doing on and with Earth, it's not working. There is almost no thing being done by humankind today, humankind writ large, the effective majority, which is not profoundly destructive.
2. And, in my sincere belief, profoundly unethical.
I don't know any honorable people today who think that the white conquest of this continent, and most of the world, was ethical. We have admitted that our founding is based in genocide and slavery. Not everyone, but some of us.
3. Although it would be slightly an exaggeration, it would not be much of an exaggeration to say that every job in the developed world causes climate change.
And there is no possible way our societies as we run them can survive climate change. And we're engaged in a giant pretend
Read 23 tweets
13 Oct
Although they're only peripherally related topics, I'm going to launch another thread with this retweet of myself.
Mostly I write about facts, which are subject to verification from generally accepted science and / or dictionaries.
But now an opinion about where we're headed.
2. I don't think that developed society as we know it today will continue for very long. I think it is currently showing signs of failure. Energy shortages, democracies failing, ransomware, shipping backlogs, fires, hurricanes - various localized events where high energy fails.
3. So far, developed regions have mostly been able to respond, to bring back the energy system, prevent mass death events, mostly.
In the event of a widespread interruption of energy distribution, one which can't be filled in from neighboring regions, there will be mass death.
Read 11 tweets
12 Oct
I am going to address the present tense.
Those of you who are old enough remember when they asked Bill Clinton, "Is there a sexual relationship between you and <<her>> and he said, "It depends on what your definition of "is" is."
People just went wild. Everyone knows what Is is!
2. Of course, what they meant was, "Everybody knows there's no difference between "is" and "was"!"
Because there was a relationship, but...
You know. Is. Or was. Or will be.
We developed these tenses in our language over the millennia for a reason.
3. Today, every day, I hear (well, read, technically) "We have the renewables. We just need to transition to them."
OK, do that.
Turn them on, turn off the fossil stuff.
Because, according to that statement, one hundred percent of the needed physical objects already exist.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(