The benefits of vaccinating ALL children b/w ages 5-11 with Pfizer #COVID19 vaccine OUTWEIGHS known or potential risks.

A long-ish 🧵 on data & risk/benefits thus far.

As an ID physician, I'll vaccinate my 5 year-old w/ confidence, and recommend to others to do the same.

(1/n)
#COVID19 is a serious infection for all kids.

Although kids who acquire COVID are at much lower risk of death than adults, other complications can occur after recovery from acute infection, including Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C), and Long #COVID.

(2/n)
Much higher rates of infection, hospitalizations, and deaths have been reported in children in last several months in the USA & Canada as a result of widespread transmission of the more contagious Delta variant.

(3/n)
Pfizer/BioNTech are conducting an ongoing clinical trial in children <12, and have requested approval for a 2-shot 10 µg of BNT162b2 for children b/w ages 5 and <12 given 3 weeks apart.

The 10 µg dose is one-third the 30 µg dose approved for those over 12.

(4/n)
2 cohorts of clinical trial participants b/w ages 5 and <12 exist.

An 'original' cohort of 2268 participants (1518 vaccine, 750 placebo), and a further 'safety expansion' cohort of 2379 participants (1591 vaccine, 788 placebo).

In total, there are 3109 vaccinated kids.

(5/n)
Vaccine effectiveness amongst the originally enrolled 2268 participants was 90.7% vs lab-confirmed COVID-19 infection.

Note: earliest COVID-19 case reported was in July 2021, majority in August / September 2021. Thus, vaccine IS protective vs Delta variant.

(6/n)
Neutralizing antibody titres in children b/w 5 and <12 were non-inferior to titres seen in young adults b/w 16-25 given 2 doses of 30 µg BNT162b2.

Additional supplemental analysis showed that neutralizing titres vs Delta variant elicited 1 month after dose 2 were robust.

(7/n)
With regards to safety and tolerability, NO cases of either pericarditis or myocarditis were observed ~3 months after dose 2 in the initially recruited cohort, or ~2.5 weeks after dose 2 in the later 'safety' cohort.

Ongoing follow-up will be needed, obviously.

(8/n)
Very few serious adverse events (SAEs) were noted in study participants, and NONE were deemed related to vaccine.

Additionally, NO adverse events were noted that led to withdrawal of a participant from the study in 3109 who received the vaccine.

(9/n)
The overall number of participants who received vaccine in the clinical trial program is too small to detect the real risk of heart inflammation associated with vaccine in this age group. Long-term follow-up is planned and will be required to best understand safety

(10/n)
Surveillance data from Israel suggests that rare events of post-vaccine myocarditis peaks in males b/w 16-19, and decreases in adolescents b/w 12-15.

Also, dosing is 1/3rd of dose given to older recipients.

Hence, can infer myocarditis rates VERY low b/w 5 and <12.

(11/n)
Assume 90% vaccine efficacy & myocarditis rates in ages 5-11 identical to ages 12-15 (likely an over-estimate). For every million vaccinated kids b/w 5-11 every 120 days in US:

- ~33,600 cases prevented
- 170 hospitalizations prevented
- ~21 heart inflammation events

(12/n)
In summary, overall benefit of reducing #COVID19 infections, hospitalizations, & deaths in kids b/w ages 5 and <12 AS WELL AS the prevention / reduction in long-term complications such as MIS-C / long COVID OUTWEIGHS potential risks (i.e. heart inflammation) of vaccine.

(13/n)
It is acknowledged that long-term safety data is unavailable and MUST be collected diligently.

Health Canada review is pending. Nearly ALL of this content was taking from the FDA technical briefing released last Friday:

fda.gov/media/153409/d…

(14/n)
We expect Health Canada conclusions to be similar to that of the FDA, meaning approval is forthcoming in Canada, followed by NACI review, and then "off we go".

Likely seeing jabs in arms by early/mid November across Canada. Earlier in the US, realistically. Yay!

(15/n)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Alexander Wong

Dr. Alexander Wong Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @awong37

27 Oct
"Hi Alex. If vaccinated folks can transmit #COVID19 like unvaccinated folks, why get vaccinated? Negative testing is good enough!"

Fully vaxxed persons transmit #COVID19 at FAR LOWER LEVELS than unvaxxed persons. Rapid antigen testing has limitations.

🧵 below to explain

(1/7)
If you're fully vaccinated, your chances of getting #COVID19 infection are MUCH lower, so your chances of transmitting are ALSO much lower too.

If you're fully vaccinated but still get #COVID19, you clear the virus MORE quickly, so you're less contagious overall.

(2/7)
This is why being fully vaccinated & PREVENTING #COVID19 infection is BETTER than just doing negative lateral flow testing (LFT, "rapid" tests).

Persons who are fully vaccinated protect themselves from infection as well as those around them MUCH BETTER.

(3/7)
Read 7 tweets
27 Oct
"Hi Alex. Do #COVID19 vaccines affect fertility? Should I get it if I'm pregnant?"

There's SO MUCH misinformation about how COVID-19 vaccines aren't safe in pregnancy or can affect fertility. THIS IS NOT TRUE.

Excellent link 👇 & short 🧵.

(1/4)

pregnancyinfo.ca/covid/
All the information we have with billions of doses of #COVID19 vaccine given is that there's NO EVIDENCE that COVID-19 vaccines affect fertility at all.

Every person, whether actively trying to conceive or just thinking about conceiving, SHOULD be vaccinated.

(2/4)
Acquiring #COVID19 while pregnant means a woman is at HIGHER RISK of needing hospitalization & ICU care versus not being pregnant. Being very sick with #COVID19 could be dangerous for baby.

All pregnant woman SHOULD be vaccinated to prevent serious illness from #COVID19.

(3/4)
Read 4 tweets
24 Oct
A LONG explanatory 🧵 on ICU 'capacity' & 'flow' in Saskatchewan & why we need MULTIPLE interventions to avoid compromised care for ALL #SK citizens & triage.

I'm going to use an analogy of ICU capacity = bathtub. Patients = water. Health care system = house.

1/ #COVID19SK
Water is running into the bathtub. That's all the patients who need ICU care in Saskatchewan. Some have COVID, some don't. The patients have now overflowed our ICUs.

To cope, we've built walls up on our bathtub to hold more water. That's our 'surge' capacity.

2/ #COVID19SK
We can only build walls up on the tub so much, because there's limits on what can be done safely w/ availability of specialized staff, especially nursing & respiratory therapists (who support ventilated persons).

We've reached that limit w/ ~120 pts in #SK ICUs.

3/ #COVID19SK
Read 19 tweets
22 Oct
Summary 🧵 of last night's SHA "town hall" for MDs:

- Overall #SK test positivity ~14%
- Cases declining, but so is testing
- #SK has HIGHEST current case & death rates of all provinces
- HIGHEST ICU census per capita of ANY province at ANY point in pandemic.

1/ #COVID19SK
Vaccine & mask mandates have helped, but not enough. #SK remains in exponential growth & cases NOT coming down at this point.

Public health experts @SaskHealth recommend gathering restrictions, including limits on household gatherings, capacity limits, etc.

2/ #COVID19SK
As of 0730hrs yesterday AM (Oct 21), 117 persons in ICU. 57 persons on high-flow oxygen (Optiflow) normally in ICU, cared for on regular hospital wards.

ICU census now forcing out-of-province transfers, widespread service slowdowns, and informal triage.

3/ #COVID19SK
Read 8 tweets
21 Oct
This is an explanatory 🧵 on ICU capacity in Saskatchewan, the different levels of ICU care & support provided across #SK, and why freeing up ICU beds in Regina & Saskatoon is SO important right now for us.

Put plainly: "not all ICU beds are equal"

(1/n)

#COVID19SK
Not all ICU "beds" are created equal. There's different capability levels to provide support for complex patients depending on the expertise of available doctors, nurses, respiratory therapists, and specialist support. (2/n)

#COVID19SK
Let's divide "care levels" into 3 buckets:

✅ 1. BASIC = ventilatory support, cardiac monitoring, IV blood pressure management, sedation, high-flow O2 support

✅ 2. SPECIALIZED = BASIC + continuous renal therapy, complex ventilatory support (eg. proning)

(3/n)

#COVID19SK
Read 11 tweets
20 Oct
Some data slides released today @SKGov w/ accompanying discussion via Dr. Shahab.

Short 🧵 w/ commentary.

First, being unvaccinated in #SK = 28X risk of ICU admission, 13X risk of hospitalization, and 6X risk of getting COVID vs. being fully vaccinated. (1/6)

#COVID19SK
Second, ~50% of all persons admitted to hospital in October had 1st positive COVID test on/after being admitted. This informs approach to early therapy, monoclonal Abs, etc.

Earlier testing & identification of illness clearly ideal. (2/6)

#COVID19SK
Overall #SK ICU census numbers continue to rise dramatically, shown by the graph on the right, attached. This is what's killing us right now.

We need relief through combination of public health measures, more ICU staff, and out-of-province transfers. (3/6)

#COVID19SK
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(