the first one is not at all like this (... for example it requires a linear particle accelerator) and because numerous scientists and engineers have spoken out about how LRAD (a sound cannon) and ADS (a directed microwave oven basically) are not at all like this?
this article is the closest I have seen to a plausible DEW theory but I still don't buy it (a lot of it amounts to well you COULD build it) nor does it explain how or why nefarious foreign agents would be running everywhere zapping people unchecked google.com/amp/s/amp.theg…
the idea there have been hundreds of attacks, many in plain sight near some of the most heavily guarded facilities in the country or even just DC proper, and the entire national security community has generated precisely zero solid leads strains credulity
seriously, no one's gotten a license plate number off a suspicious van? checked out to see who's signed suspicious leases in buildings overlooking government facilities? or - out of all these supposed hundreds of incidents - happened to witness someone aiming a weird weapon?
another thing: if this is a weapon that heats the inside of the brain then why have none of these personnel showed up with a cooked pancreas or eyeballs or something? they just always have perfect aim and it only affects brain tissue?
I'm actually not of the opinion that SOME kind of DEW that very roughly resembles what's suggested here is entirely implausible (even though the theorizing here is well short of most hard sci fi!) but one would expect this DEW to be incredibly messy
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
in his opening statement christopher cantwell immediately brings up that he doesnt know if the jury is intellectually curious enough to read Mein Kampf, but
this is not going well
Cantwell going off on a tear about how "lunatics" call him racist but race is central to his worldview? went on to denounce the "demonstrably false idea that all men are created equal", how the world would be a "dull place" if it was even though there'd be no "retardation".
Karen Dunn, attorney for the plaintiffs in Charlottesville civil trial, warns the jury that the Nazi defendants will try to make this case about politics, and that it's not about that. It's about proving they engaged in an illegal conspiracy.
This goes to the heart of what everyone expects the defense to be--antifa caused the violence, blah blah blah--and how it probably won't work because this case isn't about antifa, it's about whether the defendants engaged in an illegal conspiracy that began well before the rally
I'm probably going to be tweeting less about this than Hannah so this is a good thread to follow
there is virtually nothing more broad than the investigatory powers of congress and the legal distinction of intent he is claiming exists here ("to make/amend new laws") is pure gibberish
I look forward to Glenn's constitutional amendment