in his opening statement christopher cantwell immediately brings up that he doesnt know if the jury is intellectually curious enough to read Mein Kampf, but
this is not going well
Cantwell going off on a tear about how "lunatics" call him racist but race is central to his worldview? went on to denounce the "demonstrably false idea that all men are created equal", how the world would be a "dull place" if it was even though there'd be no "retardation".
obviously i cant see the jury's faces right now but i imagine some of them are already wondering how much in damages cantwell will be found liable for
he's now going off on some utterly incomprehensible rant about "diversity of tactics" (while getting angry about the word diversity)
the only time the plaintiffs mentioned antifa was to deny any attachment to antifa, cantwell says, which im not sure is really helping his case that antifa is a harry potter spell to wave away charges
after attacking the plaintiffs directly (just awful) and having judge moon intervene to tell him the opening statement is not a soapboax, cantwell digresses to mention something that should be "painfully obvious": "I'm not a lawyer"
cantwell is talking about how his mouth gets him in trouble, then went into how he's an entertainer and a quite handsome one he might add and bragging about being on the radio? now he's ranting about tweets
aaand Cantwell just said the N word. This is disgusting, not really sure why this is allowed to continue
"before this is done here you're gonna know that i'm not an idiot" and you're not gonna buy that, he tells the court (wow)
a lot of people seem to think this is funny because this is the worst opening statement possible but it's really not very funny. Cantwell is smearing, insulting, and slurring the plaintiffs and the people of Charlottesville over and over
i partially zoned out for a while but came back to Cantwell gleefully telling the jury that going through the evidence they're gonna hear some racist jokes
this is a very basic element of a conspiracy case and it is beyond clear Cantwell is incapable of absorbing it
Cantwell says he hopes the jurors will become fans of his, "I genuinely do appreciate diversity of opinion and lively debate" (aaaaand did he just knock over the mic?), and threatened the jury that fascists will rule the U.S. unopposed unless we crack down on radical communists
on the one hand cantwell just did a lose the case speedrun but also thank god that's over
Karen Dunn, attorney for the plaintiffs in Charlottesville civil trial, warns the jury that the Nazi defendants will try to make this case about politics, and that it's not about that. It's about proving they engaged in an illegal conspiracy.
This goes to the heart of what everyone expects the defense to be--antifa caused the violence, blah blah blah--and how it probably won't work because this case isn't about antifa, it's about whether the defendants engaged in an illegal conspiracy that began well before the rally
I'm probably going to be tweeting less about this than Hannah so this is a good thread to follow
the first one is not at all like this (... for example it requires a linear particle accelerator) and because numerous scientists and engineers have spoken out about how LRAD (a sound cannon) and ADS (a directed microwave oven basically) are not at all like this?
this article is the closest I have seen to a plausible DEW theory but I still don't buy it (a lot of it amounts to well you COULD build it) nor does it explain how or why nefarious foreign agents would be running everywhere zapping people unchecked google.com/amp/s/amp.theg…
there is virtually nothing more broad than the investigatory powers of congress and the legal distinction of intent he is claiming exists here ("to make/amend new laws") is pure gibberish
I look forward to Glenn's constitutional amendment