Karen Dunn, attorney for the plaintiffs in Charlottesville civil trial, warns the jury that the Nazi defendants will try to make this case about politics, and that it's not about that. It's about proving they engaged in an illegal conspiracy.
This goes to the heart of what everyone expects the defense to be--antifa caused the violence, blah blah blah--and how it probably won't work because this case isn't about antifa, it's about whether the defendants engaged in an illegal conspiracy that began well before the rally
I'm probably going to be tweeting less about this than Hannah so this is a good thread to follow
the plaintiffs have really emphasized how central the Charlottesville 2.0 Discord server, which the defendants believed was a clandestine channel to organize the conspiracy (it was not), will be to the case
plaintiffs pointed to an email from michael hill of league of the south which basically screams "WE ARE ENGAGED IN A CONSPIRACY"
plaintiffs point to communications from Matthew Heimbach (former Traditionalist Workers Party head who you may remember from an infamous domestic abuse case in 2018) basically explicitly outlines the org chart of the conspiracy gizmodo.com/white-supremac…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
in his opening statement christopher cantwell immediately brings up that he doesnt know if the jury is intellectually curious enough to read Mein Kampf, but
this is not going well
Cantwell going off on a tear about how "lunatics" call him racist but race is central to his worldview? went on to denounce the "demonstrably false idea that all men are created equal", how the world would be a "dull place" if it was even though there'd be no "retardation".
the first one is not at all like this (... for example it requires a linear particle accelerator) and because numerous scientists and engineers have spoken out about how LRAD (a sound cannon) and ADS (a directed microwave oven basically) are not at all like this?
this article is the closest I have seen to a plausible DEW theory but I still don't buy it (a lot of it amounts to well you COULD build it) nor does it explain how or why nefarious foreign agents would be running everywhere zapping people unchecked google.com/amp/s/amp.theg…
there is virtually nothing more broad than the investigatory powers of congress and the legal distinction of intent he is claiming exists here ("to make/amend new laws") is pure gibberish
I look forward to Glenn's constitutional amendment