Justice Sambre is now hearing Item number 31. None of the lawyers are in Court.
The Court had indicated yesterday that hearing will begin post 2.30 pm.
ASG Anil Singh is waiting outside Justice Sambre’s Court. Advocate Shreeram Shirsat from his team is waiting in Court.
Sambre is now hearing Item no. 33.
ASG Anil Singh: We have argued about conscious possession. If two people are together and one person knows about the possession and use of drugs of the second person, then the first person is in conscious possession
ASG Anil Singh: They are arguing that we have not tested to find out about consumption. We are only arguing about possession. Aryan Khan was in conscious possession of drugs.
ASG: It was a party. My learned friend is saying why we have arrested on October 2 on Gandhi Jayanti.. it is dry day we should have left them. (Laughs)
ASG Anil Singh to Bombay High Court: It cannot be a coincidence that so many people on the cruise, 8 were found with drugs and there was multiple varieties.
Bombay HIgh Court: You are invoking 37 because of commercial quantity?
Asg: we are invoking because of 28 and 29. Their contention is the arrest memo does not have S.28 and 29. But the first remand was four hours after arrest
ASG: It was for both of them. This is further elaborated in other records. Kindly see the order of Sessions Court. Asg is reading out the order para 25
ASG - Now milord may see the judgments. Bombay High Court judgment says bail application under NdPS can be granted based on more than prima facie case.
ASG: there is difference of wording of Section 50 of CrPC. It says ground has to be forthwith. They were informed within 4 hours. Can it be said they were not informed.
ASG: Two conditions, one is they may argue that there is no communication. but they must satisfy the court that the Magistrate has not taken into consideration these factors whcih he has.
ASG: my contention is he was found in possession. He was connected with drug peddlers. It was commercial quantity. Hence we invoked 28 and 29. It was only 4 hiurs and they were aware of the groudns. #AryanKhanDrugsCase#AryanKhanDrugCase#BombayHighCourt#AryanKhan
ASG: so it cannot be illegal arrestX conspiracy is difficult to prove. Only the conspirator knows how they conspired. I will leave to the conscious of the court.
ASG: Para 4 of my reply it can be seen that there is a chance of tampering of evidence because there was an affidvait which had names and details. So it cannot be said that there was no tampering.
Rohatgi: That is added with conspiracy. there is no 27A invoked against me. The conspiracy with 5-8 people with me, their recovery after you total up then there is commercial quantity.
Rohatgi: there were 1300 people on@ the ship and there was connection only between Aryan and Arbaaz. The conspiracy alleged against.. this is not a co-incidence, it is conspiracy.
Rohatgi: there was no conspiracy because there was no meeting of minds. There was no discussion that they met and decided that they will get the substance and smoke, that is conspiracy.
Rohatgi; if there are people in a hotel in different rooms and they smoke are all people in hotel in conspiracy. There is no material for calling it a conspiracy in this case.
Rohatgi: I knew only Arbaaz, I did not know anyone else. It is true it is difficult to prove that there is common meeting of mind. but facts cannot be ignored. There has to be meeting of minds. how can there be conscious possession for 6 gms.
Corrigendum fOr “how can there be conscious possession for 6 gms” - Rohatgi said - “There may be conscious possession of 6 gms but how do you prove the other recovered substance”
Rohatgi is now countering the judgements given by ASG under Section 67 of the NDPS Act.
Rohatgi: Come to Nawaz Malik judgment. This was a case where there was a car and three people were there and one was carrying substance. So then there was a submission that the possession was not conscious. #MukulRohatgi#BombayHighCourt#AryanKhanDrugCase#AryanKhanBail
Rohatgi: Let us apply to this case. i was in conscious possession that Arbaaz was carrying but how do you say that for others. It is not like they were carrying together.
The entire order with reasons, bail conditions will come out tomorrow. So there is still time for #AryanKhan to be released. He has gotten bail on the 25th day after arrest.
Wankhede counsel: No consent has been taken from the State. If Mumbai Police arrest me today, which is my apprehension, milords will not wait till the State flouts my rights.
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: the plea before you is the Joe Joseph vs State of Tamil Nadu. Parties have resolved differences apart from what height has to be maintained and what height should be of the reservoir level so that Tamil Nadu can draw some water
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: As per the rule curb prepared by state of kerala it indicates the levels which has to be maintained at different dates ... this takes into account the rainfall which has taken place for several years.
#SupremeCourt is hearing a challenge to the amendments to the FCRA and the rule mandating opening of an NGO's primary account in New Delhi SBI main branch #FCRA
Right to life and liberty under Article 21 does not encompass the right to receive unregulated foreign contributions, the Central government had told the Supreme Court while defending amendments made in 2020 to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA)
The plea by Noel Harper of NGO Care And Share Charitable Trust challenged Sections 7, 12A, 12(1A) and 17 inserted in the FCRA by the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as ultra vires Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India #SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourt to hear an appeal by the NTA challenging a Bombay High Court order halting the declaration of results of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for under graduate courses #NEETUG2021#NEETresults
SG Tushar Mehta appearing for the National Testing Agency #NEETResults
Counsel for the respondent : wrong answer sheet was given to us and wrong answers were given to questions. Then questions were attempted in hurry... The only solution was leniency. It was like a common order passed by HC.
#SupremeCourt to hear an application alleging violation of the order dated February 10, 2017 banning use of certain chemicals such as barium nitrite that is dangerous & beyond safety limits used by firecracker manufacturers #firecrackers
SC: When the earlier order of banning firecrackers was passed, it was passed after giving reasons. All crackers were not banned. : It was in larger public interest. It should not be projected that it was banned for particular purpose.
SC: Last time we said that we weren’t coming in way of enjoyment but we cannot come in way of Fundamental rights...
#SupremeCourt to deliver judgment in a bail plea plea filed by Thwaha Fasal, a journalism student accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for having Maoist links #UAPA
Bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and AS Oka to also deliver verdict on an appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) challenging the bail granted to Alan Shuhaib, a third-year law student and Fasal’s co-accused in the case #SupremeCourt
SC: Order of the special court is restored. Appeal by accused 2 us restored. Appeal by union is dismissed. Appeal by accused 1 is allowed and confirmed.