As @naftalibennett heads to #COP26, some highlights from my interview with him in @thetimes
Bennett declared victory over Covid and claimed that by not taking Israel into a 4th lockdown, he saved/made 10s of billions for Israeli Treasury > thetimes.co.uk/article/naftal…
Part of the funds now at Israel’s disposal Bennett intends to spend in rearmament against Iran. His historic analogy is Reagan in the Cold War. He believes that like the USSR, Tehran can be outspent and out-teched by Israel into submission “Reagan didn’t have to bomb Moscow!”>
In general, Bennett believes Israeli tech the answer to most problems, including climate change. “Half the solution is changing our behavior. The other half is things yet to be invented.” He hopes to convince Israeli entrepreneurs to shift from developing video-apps to greentech>
Likewise he sees Israeli tech as the base for relations in the region with networks of solar-energy fields linked to desalination plants. He claims that Arab leaders he speaks with mentions the Palestinians as “just another item” but focus mainly on “water, trade and stability” >
The 2 words Bennett tried hard not to use in the interview were “Palestinians” who according to him will have to make do with economic inducements, because the Arab world isn’t interested in them and the condemnations from western governments are “expected” but not damaging >
The other word Bennett managed not to say at all in 80 minutes of interview was “Netanyahu” whose become he-who-must-not-be-mentioned. Instead Bennett speaks of “my predecessors policies” and “the machine warping everything our government does.” That doesn’t mean Bibi was absent>
Bennett is fully aware how relieved his interlocutors abroad were to see Netanyahu leave and he’s marketing his ideologically diverse government as a global model for facing the global pandemic of political polarization that… creates paralysis in the face of threats like Covid”>
Overall, Bennett tries to project the image of a pragmatic, problem-solving, right-wing liberal. “In cabinet I work with people whom I never believed I’d be in a dialog with. Not only does the dialogue work, but there are things we couldn’t do otherwise.” thetimes.co.uk/article/naftal…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sally Rooney’s book won’t be published in Hebrew because there’s no such thing as a “BDS-compliant” Hebrew publisher. To be that, a publisher would have to agree to not selling its books in Israel and to Israelis who are is the overwhelming majority of the Hebrew-reading market.>
What’s useful about this silly episode isn’t what it tells as about Rooney (I’ve no idea if she’s an antisemite tho some think her portrayal of Jewish characters is questionable) is that it clarifies what BDS is. Read its “rules”. It isn’t about the occupation, it’s about Israel>
Under “BDS rules” Ben & Jerry’s for example isn’t BDS-compliant because they’re willing to continue selling ice cream in Israel, just not in the West Bank settlements. Rooney and any other author can’t be BDS-compliant without boycotting all Hebrew-readers. That’s BDS.
4 of the 6 Palestinian prisoners who escaped from Gilboa Prison were captured last night in 2 locations. In both cases it was tip-offs from Arab citizens that led to their capture. Which will only fuel the debate over the conflicted identity of Israel’s Arab-Palestinian citizens>
As usual, the view of both the hard-right and hard-left is pretty similar. Both see Arab-Israelis as staunchly Palestinian and non-Israeli, while of course reality is so much more complex. Here’s a 2019 poll by @dahliasc showing that 46% choose to define themselves Arab-Israeli>
If anything, it’s only getting more complex with nearly half of Arab-Israelis last year disagreeing with the Joint List position against Israel’s agreements with the UAE and Bahrain and the Arab-Israeli vote splitting between JL and Ra’am who were prepared to be in any coalition>
I didn’t have much time to tweet over Rosh Hashana so ICYMI here’s my @haaretzcom interview with philosopher, educator and author Micah Goodman on how he’s suddenly become the most influential public intellectual in Israel, confidant of prime ministers >> haaretz.com/israel-news/.p…
Full disclosure: I’ve known Micah since he was 11 and to me the most interesting thing about him is how he managed to overcome a severe learning disability (as a kid I never knew him to have read a book) to become the author of 6 best-sellers in 11 years>> haaretz.com/israel-news/.p…
Despite the headline and the interest in his “shrinking the conflict” plan I think what’s most important in the interview is how Micah sees (accurately IMO) the current level of polarization within Israeli society and how it’s reflected in the government>> haaretz.com/israel-news/.p…
When you strip away all the politics and personal rivalries, Israel’s covid-19 vaccine dilemma is very simple. What does a small country which was 1st in the world to vaccinate a large proportion of its population do when there are indications that the effectiveness is waning?
Will a 3rd “booster” dose be effective against the Delta Variant and the next variant which could be just around the corner? Do you take the risk of delivering 3rd jabs without clear data? What about the public confidence in the vaccine? Perhaps focus on non-vaccinated instead?
When it rushed to roll-out vaccines in December ‘20 Israel had the scientific backing of all the clinical tests carried out by Pfizer and the FDA approval. This time around, the world is still focused on getting developing countries their 1st doses. Not on the need for a 3rd dose
לנפתלי בנט ויאיר לפיד יש דברים חשובים יותר כרגע להתעסק בהם אבל מכיוון שכבר התחילו להתעסק בזה כאן, אתרום את קולי לדיון. אל תבטלו את פרויקט מטוס ראש הממשלה. אמנם הפרויקט נוהל באופן שערורייתי על ידי אנשי נתניהו, אבל המטוס הכרחי ומוצדק בטחונית, מדינית ואפילו כלכלית #כנףציוןלנצח
ביטול פרויקט מטוס ראש הממשלה (שישמש גם את נשיא המדינה ומשלחות גדולות של שרים בכירים נוספים) יהיה צעד פופוליסטי. בתקופת מי שנחשב לצנוע שבראשי הממשלות, מנחם בגין, עמד לרשות ראש הממשלה לא מטוס אחד, אלא שנים (בואינג 707 לטיסות עם פמליה גדולה, ומטוס ווסטווינד לגיחות קצרות - בתמונה)
מי שחושב שאפשר פשוט למכור את כנף ציון הנהדרת לא מכיר את שוק התעופה. נשיא מקסיקו אובראדור שנבחר לפני שנתיים וחצי נשבע למכור את המטוס המפואר שהזמין קודמו ולא מצא לו עד עתה קונים. ושם בבואינג 787 חדיש, לא ב-767 בן העשרים שלנו. אם לא ישתמשו בה, כנף ציון תושמד traveller.com.au/mexico-preside…