Article then gives a platform to people who have been constantly wrong, including GBDs Livermore, and goes on to try and create concern for 5+ vaccines
Livermore says vaccinating children for herd immunity is scientifically week, he's spent best part of the past two years arguing for children to be infected to "protect the vulnerable" with herd immunity
Weak*
He was happy to be in HART despite them producing lots of antivax content and conspiracy theories, involved with Russia Sputnik, the one they are accused of stealing from AZ....
Apparently we already see signs of herd immunity, during half term holiday
But this is the best bit
Says risk of ICU is 1/500,000
Later says 259 ICU admissions
259×500,000
So 129,500,000 children have been infected in the UK?
🤯
Then we have Viner, whose April 2020 paper claiming unlike flu children seem to have little impact on transmission, far less likely to be infection and adult to child transmission is very rare
Basis against school measures around world for a year
Viner argued to remove masks, then after masks had been removed claimed we had masks in classrooms improved ventilation and social distancing in schools would continue to keep us safe
This Mail article is a preemptive attack against vax for 5-11, pushing a pro infection stance, encouraging hesitancy and attacking who will be most vocal critics of abandoning children to infection
But they already have this power via the covid bill, they've used it several times, Greenwich and to several schools who tried to break up for half term
So @halfon4harlowMP is doing this just for UsForThem/CRG brownie points
Looks like I was right, JCVI mainly only looked at PHE's own studies, the ones they've gaslit us with for over 18 months
Also show an unhealthy number of assumptions with little evidence to back them, and very positive about benefits of infection
One of the presenters providing evidence on harms to children was Ladhani, who used mainly his own studies which concluded transmission isn't a significant issue in schools.
Students do need to be removed from lessons at times, for a large number of students getting taken out for the rest of the lesson and getting a detentention is enough of a deterrent.
But we all know students out all the time, falling further behind, they get stuck in a cycle
We aren't going to see booths or removals banned, no matter how exercised ppl get about it, its not on policy makers radar, we can't even get protections from a virus thats killed hundreds of us.
But booths/removal arent a solution, its a short term fix to keep a lesson going
Finn says children less infectious, children more likely to be infected by adults than the other way round, schools not a significant issue for transmission
1/
Questioned about JCVI data being published, he says he's tweeted about it, have to consider risks of vaccination, then tries to dismiss it with "well minutes haven't been published yet, there's no conspiracy"
However the data has always been published a lot quicker than this
2/
But one of Finns final comments sticks out "we shouldn't be blaming children"
Sorry but thats an arguement I've only heard from a certain section of people, like "children need their own union"
Classic dismissal line used against those worried about children being infected