Students do need to be removed from lessons at times, for a large number of students getting taken out for the rest of the lesson and getting a detentention is enough of a deterrent.
But we all know students out all the time, falling further behind, they get stuck in a cycle
We aren't going to see booths or removals banned, no matter how exercised ppl get about it, its not on policy makers radar, we can't even get protections from a virus thats killed hundreds of us.
But booths/removal arent a solution, its a short term fix to keep a lesson going
We get so much heat from this and nothing constructive, just attack attack attack, "ppl who believe x also believe y"
What do we do to help those students who its stops being a deterrent and becomes a way of life?
ATM what happens is exclusion or offrolling
This might "fix" the problem for the school, but often not for that pupil.
Exclusion for safeguarding purposes is still necessary, many offrolling examples are not safeguarding, but this also gets lost in the heat.
Its an issue schools alone can't solve
We can talk about parental responsibility, some of the most disruptive students I've encountered in my very comprehensive school come from well off stable families and know a parent will be giving them a decent paid job when they leave,in these cases we can talk about entitlement
Other students come from chaotic, unstable, traumatic homes, every family is different and we will encounter some cases where parents aren't putting their children first, this will be a minority, many unstable homes are desperately in need of help and support
Parental responsibility
Read to your kids every day
Set boundaries
All sensible points, ppl can argue that poverty doesn't matter its about hard work, but what do we say to the child that watches a parent work 2 jobs and still struggle to pay the bills, who can't be there to
Always do the 3 mentioned above, because a roof, food and clothes must take priority?
What about the children with parents who are distracted from their best interests?
This is the conversation we should be having,
I have a friend, works in education single parent, hard working, responsible for the most challenging pupils, everyone I know who has worked with them is impressed by how they are firm and fair
They did all the right things, read, boundaries, limited digital device time
But mid teens their child got swept up into county lines.
Slogans don't match the complexity of life, saw this kind of thing among my peers when I was late teens, the punk loving kids from the grammar school ended up shooting heroin in a grammar school.
And many of the rough edged working class kids that were scrapping in the street and mid level drug dealing at 17 are managers in offices, working in finance or self employed tradesmen.
You can look at stats and trends but they smooth out individuality where personal solutions
Which actually change lives will be found.
Booths don't solve the problem, removal is needed.
Schools need more support, sitting in rows might be good but it ain't going to solve this
How do we join up social services, CAHMS, counselling, youth justice, employment programmes
and all the other services which we dont have.
So ppl might say funding isn't the solution, and there comes a point where that is true, but we don't have enough to sustain basic sticking plaster services, never alone to give meaningful support
Its a 10 year plan thats needed, because first of all we need a lot more people to be skilled up to provide these services, we need a lot of specialists.
But neither this nor blaming parents helps the children who are struggling right now for no fault of their own?
For a while host of reasons many parents and children are in survival mode, and this is what often leads to difficulties.
What can we do in the next 12 months to get ppl out of survival mode?
A slogan won't solve this, we need nuance not heat
And as we are all flawed I'm going to finish with what many may see as hypocrisy by having a dig.
The isolation booth/exclusion debate often boils down to talking about accepting abuse and harm to pupils and staff, supporting booths/exclusion is about protecting people
The fact many who think exclusions booths can be overused but state safeguarding must always come first is ignored when high profile supporters wish to lump those not on their side into a homogeneous group (like "the blob" all over again),particularly when taking a dig at NEU
The narrative is that the union doesn't care about student safety and the booth/exclusion defenders are the real defenders of education workers and students
We are in a pandemic and have been left unprotected, where are the high profile pro gov accounts on this subject?
Nearly 600 of us have died
ONS estimates 114k have long covid
Neaely 100 children are dead, this term its several a week dying, over 1000 hospitalised for successive months, and this is before we start discussing growing data on other health impacts,morbidity, and immunity damage
Decade of austerity, hungry kids, collapsed services, a rampant pandemic, antivaxxers accosting students and staff in the streets
But let's use large platforms to focus on booths that we know aren't going to be banned anytime soon
Ppl with gov links could have spoken up
They could have called for ventilation and filtration and other protective measures
Takes too long?
We've had two summer holidays
Cost?
Alcohol tax cut was £3billion
Not your job?
Protecting health is the most basic safeguarding
If they havent spoken up about pandemic protection then they arent really concerned about the safety of staff and students
They arent concerned about addressing the deeper issues, its personal promotion and beating the other side
Looks like I was right, JCVI mainly only looked at PHE's own studies, the ones they've gaslit us with for over 18 months
Also show an unhealthy number of assumptions with little evidence to back them, and very positive about benefits of infection
One of the presenters providing evidence on harms to children was Ladhani, who used mainly his own studies which concluded transmission isn't a significant issue in schools.
World Health Network officially launches via @TheLancet
Proud to say I'm a member and played a small part of the collaborative effort thats gone into an exciting organisations that brings together scientific expertise and real grassroots groups
Finn says children less infectious, children more likely to be infected by adults than the other way round, schools not a significant issue for transmission
1/
Questioned about JCVI data being published, he says he's tweeted about it, have to consider risks of vaccination, then tries to dismiss it with "well minutes haven't been published yet, there's no conspiracy"
However the data has always been published a lot quicker than this
2/
But one of Finns final comments sticks out "we shouldn't be blaming children"
Sorry but thats an arguement I've only heard from a certain section of people, like "children need their own union"
Classic dismissal line used against those worried about children being infected
#r4today Paper review 1. @FraserNelson claims NHS isn't in crisis.
Would this be the @spectator which has disinformation group HARTs David Paton as a writer
Fraser who a year ago claimed we had herd immunity and would get no second wave?
#r4today then quotes Philip Thomas who claimed in March 2020 that lockdowns kill more than covid, advised the treasury to unlock regardless and now works for the Spectator. A year ago he claimed no second wave
3. #r4today had a headline that Government is going to provide laptops for disadvantaged students,
Without mentioning that they promised this in April 2020 and still haven't delivered
2/ If we want to get back to normal we need to get RO below one, we need to understand that #COVIDisAirborne and appreciate what the virus actually does to morbidity and the immune system
Its not endemic and living with it makes healthcare unsustainable
3/ As others have said we need an air sanitation revolution in much the way we did in regards to water sanitation when we came to understand waterborne pathogens
This also puts us in a far stronger position when another variant or pandemic comes along