Fascinating thread where CNN stars slowly admit that their rhetorical posture -- everyone who dissents in any way from our decrees is racist and/or stupid -- is alienating and ugly, but they didn't realize this because they live in an "echo chamber" of like-minded liberals:
This is a major plague in modern journalism. The don't hear dissent. When is the last time Anderson Cooper or Chris Hayes or a NYT op-ed writer dialogued with someone saying they're full of shit? They only talk to and for each other and thus think everyone loves them & agrees.
But even with that painful acknowledgement on CNN -- our insistence on smearing anyone who sees the world differently than we do as racist, fascist and/or stupid makes people hate us -- they can't stop doing it. They're doing it this morning. It's all they know how to do now.
Even if you want to claim that no Virginia voter, absent racism, could possibly reject a life-long supreme scumbag like Terry McAuliffe -- one of the only people ever to be almost too sleazy and amoral for Clinton World -- how to explain all the other huge Dem losses?
This is a great @matthewstoller thread on why the Dem Party cannot "reform" to re-connect with anyone other than their core base of elites and minorities (and even there they're losing ground). They're *structured* to serve the elite managerial class:
And here, just by the way, is a hilarious Camille Paglia passage from 2008 on why, even given her generalized hatred for Dem operatives, Terry McAuliffe has always been singularly repulsive. Keep telling people only racism could explain rejecting him:
The most important source for Christopher Steele and his Dossier fraud -- not one of his sources, but *the* most important -- was just indicated for lying to the FBI. What we are seeing, again, is that the real crimes were in the origins of Russiagate, spread mindlessly by media.
This latest indictment of Steele's main source is finally provoking some self-examination and self-critique from key media outlets behind the Russiagate fraud, including this tentative but still significant concession from the @washingtonpost:
NYT & WashPost showered themselves with Pulitzers for their monomaniacal obsession with Russiagate. Even after Mueller admitted he could find no evidence to establish the conspiracy and indicted *nobody* for it, they persisted. We'll see what they do now:
For years, the @WhiteCoatWaste was heralded by The WPost as what they are: an activist success story uniting right and left. But now its work imperils a liberal icon, Dr. Fauci, so they assembled a team to suddenly and falsely smear them as a MAGA-funded, anti-science operation.
For five years, the Post heralded the group when they were denouncing experimentations under Trump. But now that their work is a threat to Fauci, the Post suddenly demanded vast financial docs and, when it turned up nothing, demanded they pledge not to take "pro-Trump" donations.
When @cwarzel left NYT to go to Substack, it was hyped as a test case for whether writers with big corporate outlets actually have their own audience willing to follow them and pay to read them. As he admits here, it failed, so he's going to @TheAtlantic:
Much of his article is just standard envy/resentment from corporate employees at those who succeed (always funny being demeaned as a "blogger" by those who have never broken major stories), but he makes a key point: those who just spout mainstream orthodoxies can't be independent
The main reason a new, thriving media ecosystem has emerged -- call it "Roganism" if you need a label -- is corporate news outlets are now so stifling, more rigidly repressive than ever with ideological homogeneity, so they all sound alike. People aren't hungry for more of that.
Right there in those emails you can read for yourself -- ☝️-- @Slate and @FranklinFoer were taking orders directly from the Clinton campaign's firm about what to publish and when, and then showed them a draft for approval. How is that not fully corrupt?
A special counsel working the Biden DOJ just indicted Hillary's lawyer for his role in fabricating this Trump-Alfa Bank story. Rather than any consequences for pushing it at the behest of the Clinton campaign, Foer was promoted to @TheAtlantic.
One of the overlooked points in the NY Mag profile on @mtaibbi is the irony of calling him a "grifter."
The easiest way *by far* to get rich in media over the last 5 years was to become an anti-Trump, Russiagate, #Resistance fanatic. Ask Adam Schiff & his #1 book on the NYT list
People driven by enriching themselves rather than conviction -- "grifting" -- knew that the easiest path to profit and fame was becoming a Russia-and-Trump-obsessed #Resistance extremist.
That's why it's so ironic that those of us who *refused* to do that are called "grifters."
Those on the center-left who thrived most did so with constant anti-Trump agitprop. It saved Chris Hayes' job and made him millions. It turned tons of unknown charlatans into rich social media stars. It paid off the Lincoln Project's debts & bought them new boats. And:
Note that CNN and @ChrisCuomo did not put the LP's @stuartpstevens on air as a fraudsters who had been caught orchestrating a smear. Cuomo asked one light question -- won't this hurt Dems? (his only concern) -- but Stevens was there as a CNN pundit, to comment on the VA race.
CNN specializes in putting known liars on the air: not to grill them but to deliver the news. After James Clapper got caught lying to the Senate about the NSA, CNN *hired* him. *The same day* the Lincoln Project caused a racist lie to spread, CNN welcomed them onto a panel.