We have to change the incentive structure of social media, says @glichfield at #FWD50:
Think about a different way to give value that's less about short-term gratification.
The "time well spent" movement is one idea.
How you get people to value that?
Maybe by them paying for it.
@glichfield Laws like GDPR end up leaving us flooded us with pop-ups that don't leave us better informed, says @glichfield. (Like a EULA & ToS)
He says we need to move away from ownership & control frame to protecting people from harms when data is misused & redress from those abuses #FWD50
The explosion of the Internet meant that the scarce thing was no longer content, but attention, says @glichfield. The platforms that emerged were the ones that monetized attention, because that was scarce. #FWD50.
(Ergo, I value the slices of attention you give me a great deal.)
@glichfield Riffing on science fiction (@DavidBrin?), @acroll says the job is not to predict cars, but traffic jams. @glichfield says use the tools of social science to make predictions about what people will do with emerging tech (citing @zeynep) rather than expect rational behavior. #FWD50
Like @glichfield, I expected nations would adopt tech to enable normal life – contact tracing, testing, quarantines.
I also overestimated capacity of governments to implement tech (404 "vaccination passports") & how much people would value freedom of movement over safety. #FWD50
Each disruption to a key service – Internet, Facebook, electricity – teaches us about the need for more resilience, says @glichfield, in answer to @acroll's question about the "civilization stack.
As with losing water, air, or power, online outrages show us what we need. #FWD50
Maybe we're headed for a long-term breakdown of the "truth class," muses @glichfield, in response to @acroll: perhaps we'll create other ways to create reliable knowledge about the world or models of governance that enable us to form consensus.
-> pol.is #FWD50
What @glichfield acknowledged is important: many people in the "truth class" *have* been dismissive or hostile to emerging tech – the Internet, Web, social media, & apps – and some still are.
Key gatekeepers endure, but info now gets routed around them.
@piawaugh My mistake: @piacandrews.
She's talking now at #FWD50 about a wicked problem for governments everywhere: how to provide trustworthy public services & info, both of which are mission-critical in war, peace, pandemic, & disasters.
"Rather than asking for trust, you need to start being trustworthy"– @PiaCAndrews
One way to do that for digital government services is to use open source code, with audits to ensure algorithmic accessibility & "explainability." wossat.nz/archive/2021-0…
@repjohnlewis@WhiteHouse@Sen_JoeManchin "We cannot continue to allow the filibuster, an archaic Senate tradition — one that, historically, has been a favored tool of those who oppose civil rights — to be used to obstruct the advancement of this critical voting rights legislation."– @Sifill_LDFnaacpldf.org/press-release/…
@cwardell@WhiteHouse Per @cwardell at #FWD50, @WhiteHouse achieved equitable delivery of American Rescue Plan funds directly to families with a mobile-first, bilingual website.
90% receiving direct deposits.
He says 3 million kids are kept out of poverty each month this way.
@cwardell@WhiteHouse This work is critical, says @cwardell, not only for how we respond from this pandemic, but for how we deal with future challenges; not just as America, but as a global society.
(He's right: equitable service delivery of relief in pandemics shift the arc of life & death)
“Tweets posted by accounts from the political right receive more algorithmic amplification than the political left”
“Right-leaning news outlets…see greater algorithmic amplification on @Twitter compared to left-leaning news outlets” blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/c…
Malloy unspools this:
Both @Twitter & @Facebook algorithmically amplified far-right content that’s disproportionately rife with medical misinfo & official lies about voter fraud:
Madame Secretary, it appears @POTUS isn't taking the gathering threat an anti-democratic, far-right movement poses seriously, if any @WhiteHouse staff see voting rights as just another issue: theatlantic.com/politics/archi… Election subversion is an existential risk to liberal democracy
In the 19th century, Republicans enacted a civil rights act, 14th, & 15th Amendments without Democrats.
In 2021, an anti-democratic party seeks to deny voting rights & subvert elections.
A union divided cannot stand.
A democracy unprotected will not endure